Let denote wealth measured in units of the strictly positive numéraire. A predictable self-financing portfolio is an arbitrage if
Equivalently, one may permit provided one of the two gains is strict.
The finite-horizon discrete-time fundamental theorem of asset pricing states that the market has no arbitrage if and only if there exists a probability measure equivalent to under which every integrable discounted asset price is a martingale. Such a is an equivalent martingale measure.
Condition (i) says that each discounted risky price is an integrable -martingale. For a bounded predictable risky holding process , self-financing gives the discounted wealth equation in discrete time
Each increment is integrable and
Hence is a -martingale, proving (i) (ii).
If is a -martingale, then
because is -trivial and equivalence makes it -trivial as well. Thus (ii) (iii).
Assume (iii). Fix , a coordinate , and an event . Choose the bounded predictable risky strategy
and choose the numéraire holding to make the strategy self-financing with . Its terminal discounted value is
Condition (iii) yields
for every . The defining property of conditional expectation implies
Every coordinate is therefore a -martingale, so (iii) (i). This proves the martingale characterization by bounded self-financing strategies.
Suppose an arbitrage existed. Its discounted terminal wealth would satisfy -almost surely and . Equivalence of and gives the same two statements under , so
But part (c), after the usual admissibility or localization needed for integrability, gives
a contradiction. Hence the existence of the stated martingale measure rules out arbitrage.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.