An arithmetic function is multiplicative if whenever and are coprime integers. If and , every positive integer divisor of is uniquely with and . Hence
so is multiplicative.
The Möbius function is defined by , if the square of a prime number divides , and if is a product of distinct prime numbers. Coprime integers have disjoint sets of prime factors, so this definition immediately gives when .
For , only the square-free divisors contribute, and therefore
For the sum is . Thus in the language of Dirichlet convolution. Convolving with gives the Möbius inversion formula
If , its divisor sum is the sum-of-divisors function. Conversely, if , Möbius inversion gives
using the standard divisor identity for the Euler totient function. Therefore the two requested answers are
One form of the Baire category theorem says that a nonempty complete metric space cannot be a countable union of closed nowhere dense sets.
For each nonnegative integer , put
Because is an entire function, every derivative is continuous and is closed. No is identically zero: if for some , repeated integration shows that is a polynomial. By the identity theorem, the zero set of the nonzero holomorphic function has empty interior. Thus each is nowhere dense.
The complex plane is complete, so the Baire category theorem gives
Choose outside this union. Then for every , and hence every coefficient in the Taylor series about is nonzero. Such a point therefore exists.
The relation makes this a length-seven binary cyclic code. Since , the generator polynomial of a cyclic code gives
The polynomial itself is a codeword of Hamming weight three, so the minimum distance is at most three. A nonzero word of weight one cannot vanish at the nonzero element . If a weight-two word vanished there, then ; because has order seven and , this forces . Hence there are no nonzero words of weight below three, and
The equation gives in the finite field , and therefore
By the root-evaluation syndrome for a cyclic code, this is the syndrome of the single error . Since , minimum-distance decoding uniquely corrects one error. Subtracting and adding agree over , so the decoded codeword is
A context-free grammar is in Chomsky normal form when every production rule has one of the forms
where are nonterminal symbols and is a terminal symbol. If the language contains the empty word, one may additionally permit , with the start symbol absent from all right-hand sides.
Add a fresh start symbol with .
Find the nullable nonterminals, add the variants obtained by omitting nullable occurrences, and remove all epsilon productions. Omit as well because the requested language excludes .
Remove every unit production by copying the non-unit productions reachable from to .
Remove nonterminals that are unreachable from or cannot derive a terminal word.
In every right-hand side of length at least two, replace a terminal by a fresh nonterminal with .
Replace each right-hand side of length greater than two by a chain of binary productions using fresh nonterminals.
Each remaining production is of the required binary or terminal form, and these transformations preserve every nonempty generated word. Thus .
The original grammar generates
because each use of adds one on the left and one on the right, and terminates the derivation.
Introduce nonterminals and use
Every production is in Chomsky normal form. The production completes one matched pair, while either start-like symbol terminates with , so the grammar generates exactly the same language. These productions are a valid .
Treat the cell counts as independent Poisson random variables. Under independence of Month and Hospital, the independence log-linear model for a two-way contingency table is
with no Month–Hospital interaction. Compare its Poisson deviance with the appropriate upper quantile of a chi-squared distribution. This is the likelihood-ratio test of independence in a contingency table.
The approximation assumes independent counts with correctly specified Poisson means, identifiable parameters, and sufficiently large fitted cell means for the asymptotic chi-squared law to be accurate. Equivalently, one may condition on the margins and use the corresponding multinomial sampling formulation.
For the month table there are cells and independent model parameters, so the residual degrees of freedom are
Since
model 1 does not reject Month–Hospital independence at the level.
After combining months into four quarters, the table is , giving
degrees of freedom. Now
so model 2 rejects Quarter–Hospital independence at the level.
There is no contradiction. Relabelling twelve months as four quarters aggregates the contingency table, changes the null hypothesis, and reduces the degrees of freedom. The quarter-level hospital pattern is coherent enough to cross the much lower six-degree-of-freedom threshold even though the more detailed month-level omnibus test does not. This is an instance of how aggregation can change a contingency-table independence test.
For a radial function, the equation is
Therefore, assuming the population density and radial flux decay at infinity and are regular at the origin,
Thus is conserved; it is the total population obtained by integrating density over the plane. This is the global form of the equation's conservation law.
Set
Then
while the radial diffusion term has the same prefactor and equals
Equating them and multiplying by gives
so the proposed ansatz is a similarity solution.
Regularity at makes the constant of integration zero. Wherever ,
for some . The nonnegative weak solution continues as once this parabola reaches zero:
This is the two-dimensional Barenblatt profile for quadratic porous-medium diffusion; its degenerate diffusivity permits compact support.
Indeed, conservation requires
so if desired. At time the populated disk has radius and hence area
On the slit plane , choose
so that as . This branch cut gives, for , the boundary values
Integrate over the boundary of a large disk with a thin slit removed. The upper bank is traversed from to and the lower bank from to , so together they contribute
At infinity the Laurent series is
and hence the counterclockwise large-circle integral tends to . By the Cauchy integral theorem, the large-circle and slit-boundary contributions sum to zero. Therefore
which yields
The kinetic energy of the three unit masses is . Expanding the potential gives
Thus the small-oscillation mass and stiffness matrices are
where is the all-ones matrix.
The vector is an eigenvector of the stiffness matrix with eigenvalue . Every vector orthogonal to it has coordinate sum zero and is an eigenvector with eigenvalue . Since , the generalized eigenvalue problem for small oscillations gives equal to these eigenvalues. One orthonormal choice of normal modes is
The last two may be replaced by any orthonormal basis of the sum-zero plane because the frequency is degenerate. Hence the normal frequencies are .
In the very early universe, assume species is in thermal equilibrium, is ultrarelativistic so that and , and has negligible chemical potential, . Its occupation factor is then the Bose-Einstein distribution for a boson or the Fermi-Dirac distribution for a fermion.
Substitute and set . Since and ,
For a bosonic degree of freedom, the supplied integral gives
For a fermionic degree of freedom, use
Changing variable in the second integral gives
This is the energy-density case of the fermion-to-boson thermal integral ratio.
Summing the result of part (a) over all particle species therefore gives
where the effective number of relativistic energy degrees of freedom is
Apply a Pauli X gate and then a Hadamard gate to the third qubit, and apply Hadamard gates to the first two. This prepares
One application of the Boolean quantum oracle now gives, by quantum phase kickback,
The answer qubit is unentangled and may be ignored. If all three qubits must be restored to the displayed register form, applying and then to the answer qubit maps back to . Thus the first register is exactly after one use of .
If is constant, then
The sign is a physically irrelevant global phase.
If , then
so
In either promised case, construct by the one-query procedure in part (a), apply the Walsh-Hadamard transform to its two qubits, and perform a quantum measurement in the computational basis. The outcome is certainly for case (i) and certainly for case (ii). Therefore
This is a two-bit instance of Bernstein-Vazirani phase kickback, and also a promised Deutsch-Jozsa test.
Write an integral binary quadratic form as , with discriminant of a binary quadratic form . It is positive definite when and . Two forms are equivalent if one is obtained from the other by an integral linear change of variables whose matrix lies in . A positive definite form is reduced when
with when or .
To reduce a form, apply a unimodular shear with chosen so that the new middle coefficient has . If the new final coefficient is smaller than , exchange the variables, using a determinant-one rotation, so that the positive leading coefficient decreases from to . Repeating must stop because a positive integer cannot decrease indefinitely. At termination , and elementary sign changes impose the boundary convention. This is the reduction algorithm for a positive definite binary quadratic form, and proves that every positive definite form is equivalent to a reduced one.
The displayed forms have discriminant , so the intended discriminant is . For any reduced form of this discriminant, enumeration of reduced binary quadratic forms gives
The boundary convention and direct checking of leave only
Suppose first that a prime is represented by . The identity
shows modulo both and that is a nonzero square. Hence
Similarly,
Modulo , this says is a square, while modulo it says is a square. Since , the multiplicativity of the Legendre symbol gives
Conversely, suppose the two displayed Legendre symbols have the same sign. By quadratic reciprocity,
Choose an odd integer satisfying . Since is odd, is also divisible by , so
is a positive definite integral form of discriminant that represents . Reducing yields either or , and equivalence preserves represented integers. The necessary symbol calculation above determines which one: the positive pair selects , and the negative pair selects . Therefore
The pumping lemma for regular languages states that for every regular language there is an integer such that every with can be written
with
To prove it, let a deterministic finite automaton with states recognize . During the reading of the first symbols of an accepted word , the automaton visits states, including the initial state. By the pigeonhole principle, two of them agree, say with . Let be the first symbols, the next symbols, and the remaining suffix. Reading is a nonempty closed path from to itself. Traversing this path any number of times and then reading therefore reaches the same accept state. This proves all three assertions.
Because is minimal, every state is accessible. Choose a word taking the initial state to , and let the nonempty word label the closed path . If a word took to an accept state, then
These words have strictly increasing lengths because , contradicting the assumption that is finite. Hence no accept state is reachable from .
Suppose a path took to a state . Part (i) implies that no accept state is reachable from either or . Thus every possible continuation is rejected from both states, so and are indistinguishable states of a deterministic finite automaton. Distinct indistinguishable states cannot occur in a minimal deterministic finite automaton. Therefore , and there is no path from to any other state.
Define the Multivariate Fokker-Planck probability current by
Then
so the Fokker-Planck equation is exactly the continuity equation .
Integrating the continuity equation over state space and applying the divergence theorem gives
Assume the probability density function and its derivatives decay sufficiently rapidly at infinity, or impose a zero-flux boundary condition. The boundary integral then vanishes, so is constant. Since it is initially one, the distribution remains normalized for all time.
Assume again that all boundary terms vanish. Multiplying the Fokker-Planck equation by and integrating by parts gives
The diffusion term vanishes after the second integration by parts.
Similarly, and
Because is symmetric,
These are the First two moments of a multivariate Fokker-Planck equation.
With and constant , the Fokker-Planck probability current becomes
In the stationary state we impose the stronger zero-current condition , corresponding to detailed balance.
For
with symmetric ,
Substitution into the current from part (d) yields
It vanishes for all exactly when
Thus the stated multivariate normal distribution is a stationary solution whenever the zero-current assumption makes symmetric positive definite. This is the Stationary Gaussian density for a linear Fokker-Planck equation.
Comparison with the multivariate normal density shows that is its precision matrix. Since the mean is zero,
Multiplying on the right by gives . Taking the transpose and using the symmetry of and gives . Hence the stationary covariance obeys the Continuous Lyapunov equation
The same equation follows directly by setting the time derivative of the second-moment equation from part (c) to zero.
At the centre, spherical symmetry and regularity require a finite central density and
At the stellar surface , the pressure vanishes:
For a stellar polytrope these become the dimensionless conditions , , and the surface is the first zero ; specifying fixes the overall scale.
With the polytropic equation of state and substitutions
we have
The pressure-support equation therefore becomes
Choose
Changing from to then yields the Lane-Emden equation
These are the Lane-Emden variables for a stellar polytrope.
Using the enclosed mass integral, , and the Lane-Emden equation,
Substituting the value of from part (b) gives the Lane-Emden mass formula
Since , the scaling in part (b) gives
Substitute this into . After collecting powers,
where
This is the polytropic mass-radius relation.
An polytrope models a white dwarf whose electrons are an ultrarelativistic degenerate gas. For , the radius exponent vanishes and the mass is independent of both and . This fixed limiting value is the Chandrasekhar mass: increasing the central density can no longer support a larger mass, so a cold nonrotating white dwarf above the limit cannot remain in hydrostatic equilibrium.
Measure the second register of . If the result is , injectivity within one period collapses the first register to the periodic coset state
Apply and measure the first register. By the stated transform identity, the outcome is
for a uniformly random .
Reduce the rational number
to lowest terms and call its denominator . The exact period recovery from a Fourier sample gives
Thus exactly when is coprime to .
The success can be certified with two classical function evaluations. Compute and . Since and , periodicity and injectivity within a period imply
Report only when this equality holds; otherwise report failure. The success probability is
using the standard lower bound for the Euler totient function. This is heralded exact quantum period finding when the period divides the register size.
The powers of modulo are
They then repeat, and none of the first three positive exponents returns . Hence the least period is .
Each of the four values
occurs for three of the twelve inputs. The corresponding basis states in the first register are orthogonal, so the Born rule gives
The value occurs at . Projecting onto that measurement outcome and normalizing leaves the periodic coset state
Here , , , and . The supplied quantum Fourier transform of a periodic coset state gives, with ,
Consequently,
The compactness theorem for first-order logic says that a set of first-order sentences has a model if and only if every finite subset of has a model. The forward implication is immediate. Conversely, if every finite subset is satisfiable, then is syntactically consistent: any proof of a contradiction would use only finitely many premises. The Godel completeness theorem then gives a model of .
The Upward Lowenheim-Skolem theorem says that a first-order theory with an infinite model has arbitrarily large models. Given an infinite model of and any cardinal , enlarge the language by constants for and add
Every finite subset can interpret its finitely many constants as distinct elements of the original infinite model. By the compactness theorem, the enlarged theory has a model containing at least distinct elements; its reduct is a model of .
Finally, suppose a set and a finite set axiomatize the same class. Let be the conjunction of the sentences in . Since , the set is unsatisfiable. Compactness gives a finite such that . Because , we also have , while is immediate. Therefore yes: the finite subset axiomatizes the same theory. This is finite subaxiomatization from an equivalent finite theory.
The class of finite groups is not first-order axiomatizable. If axiomatized it, add constants and all inequalities . Every finite fragment has a sufficiently large finite cyclic group as a model. The compactness theorem would then give an infinite group satisfying , contradicting the definition of the class. This is the group instance of the fact that finite structures are not first-order axiomatizable.
This class is the class of torsion-free groups and is axiomatizable. Take the group axioms and, for every integer , the sentence
These sentences exclude every nonidentity element of finite order and give the first-order axiomatization of torsion-free groups.
The class is axiomatizable by the partial order axioms together with totality:
Explicitly, the remaining axioms state reflexivity, antisymmetry, and transitivity. This is the first-order axiomatization of total orders.
The class of well-orderings is not first-order axiomatizable. If axiomatized it, add constants and sentences
Every finite subset has a finite well-order containing the required finite descending chain. By the compactness theorem, the whole set has a model; that model satisfies but contains an infinite descending chain, so it is not a well-order. This contradiction proves the claim, as summarized by well-orders are not first-order axiomatizable.
A -colouring assigns one of colours to every vertex so that adjacent vertices have different colours. The chromatic number is the least such . An independent set contains no adjacent pair, and the independence number is the maximum size of such a set.
For a concrete first example, start with the five-cycle and apply the Mycielski construction times. Each application raises the chromatic number by one and preserves triangle-freeness. The resulting graph has chromatic number and contains no triangle, hence no complete graph for .
We next prove the stronger high-girth assertion by the probabilistic method. For a large integer , take
If counts cycles of lengths , then
By the first moment method, with probability tending to one .
Let . The expected number of independent sets of size is at most
because dominates . Hence with positive probability has fewer than short cycles and .
Delete one vertex from each cycle of length at most . The remaining graph has no such cycle, has at least vertices, and still has . Since each colour class is independent,
This proves that there are graphs of arbitrarily high girth and chromatic number.
For the final claim, begin instead with
The expected number of triangles is
so with probability tending to one . Put . The expected number of independent -sets is bounded by
because the positive term is whereas the negative term has order .
Thus some such has fewer than triangles and no independent set of size . Delete one vertex from every triangle; more than vertices remain and the graph is triangle-free. Take any induced subgraph on exactly vertices. Vertex deletion cannot increase the independence number, so the resulting graph satisfies
This is the triangle-free graph with sub-power independence number construction.
Put and . The automorphism-count bound for a finite field extension gives
For the reverse inequality, let be linearly independent over . We claim that the matrix
has linearly independent columns over . If not, choose a nonzero relation
with the fewest nonzero coefficients, and normalize one coefficient to . Applying and reindexing the rows gives another relation with coefficients . Subtracting eliminates the first term, so minimality forces for every and . Thus every . The row for the identity automorphism then contradicts the -linear independence of the .
Therefore . Taking an -basis of gives , and hence
This proves the degree assertion in the Artin fixed-field theorem.
Every permutes the factors:
Thus all coefficients lie in the fixed field . Let be the field they generate over . Then
Because and has degree with root ,
Part (a) and the tower law for field extensions give
Consequently , so
This is the coefficients of an orbit polynomial for a primitive generator result.
For either , the same permutation-of-factors argument shows that every coefficient of lies in .
They need not generate the whole fixed field. Assume , choose with independent nonsquare classes, and put
Let , where
Then
so all their coefficients generate only . However is fixed by , and the degree count in part (a) shows
Thus separate orbit polynomials can miss mixed invariants.
The row orthogonality relations for a character table state that for irreducible characters ,
Equivalently, if runs through representatives of the conjugacy classes ,
Fix an irreducible . The sum of the elements in a conjugacy class is central in , so Schur lemma says that it acts in the representation affording by the scalar
This central character value of a conjugacy-class sum is an algebraic integer: the class sum acts by a matrix with integer entries on the regular representation, and is one of its eigenvalues. Also is an algebraic integer because character values are sums of roots of unity.
Row orthogonality with now gives
The right-hand side is an algebraic integer. The left-hand side is rational, and every rational algebraic integer is an integer. Therefore
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 247 total.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.