Assume stellar homology: fixed dimensionless profiles, uniform fixed composition, negligible radiation pressure, ideal gas support, and radiative transport throughout the model. Mass conservation gives . The hydrostatic pressure support equation gives ; combining with gives .
Integrating specific proton–proton chain energy generation over mass gives
For radiative diffusion in a star, , hence . With the Kramers' opacity law ,
Equating generated and transported luminosity gives , so the radiative homology with proton-proton burning and Kramers opacity relation is
The proportionality constants are fixed only within the adopted homologous family, not for arbitrary evolving stars.
Using in the radiative diffusion in a star scaling from part (i),
Therefore the mass-luminosity relation is
The nuclear scaling independently gives , consistent with radiative homology with proton-proton burning and Kramers opacity.
The Stefan–Boltzmann law defines the effective temperature through . The stellar homology relations give , so
Thus
In a logarithmic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, with plotted vertically against ,
The usual horizontal axis increases in effective temperature toward the left, so the hotter, more luminous end lies toward the upper left. The quoted algebraic slope uses increasing as the coordinate.
Retain the same stellar homology and gas-pressure assumptions, but use the specified CNO cycle law and constant electron-scattering opacity. The nuclear luminosity now scales as
The radiative diffusion in a star scaling becomes
Equating the two yields . Therefore radiative homology with CNO burning and electron scattering gives
Since , the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives
This is a model comparison using the exponent 16 prescribed here. Actual massive stars may have appreciable radiation pressure and convective cores, which violate the assumptions of this purely radiative gas-pressure family.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.