One direction follows by restriction. Conversely, suppose is a Non-Archimedean absolute value. Then for every integer . For , the binomial theorem and the ordinary triangle inequality give
Taking th roots and letting yields the ultrametric inequality for . Thus an extension of an absolute value is non-Archimedean exactly when its restriction is.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Choose a -basis of . Each extended absolute value is a norm on the finite-dimensional -vector space , and equivalence of norms in finite dimensions shows that every such norm induces the same topology when is complete. Consequently any two extended absolute values induce the same topology on . By the result of Question 2a, one is a positive real power of the other. Their restrictions to the nontrivially valued field are both , so that power is one. In particular every extension is equal, and therefore equivalent, to .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
By local factorization and extended absolute values, extensions of to the number field correspond to the irreducible factors of over .
For , the polynomial is Eisenstein, hence irreducible, so there is one extension. For , a root would be a unit with , but then , not . A reducible cubic has a root, so the polynomial is again irreducible and there is one extension.
For , reduction gives
The factors are coprime, and the quadratic has discriminant , a nonsquare modulo . Hensel lemma lifts this as one linear and one irreducible quadratic factor over , giving two extensions. The requested numbers are therefore
for , respectively.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.