Suppose first that is a totally ramified extension of degree , and let be a uniformizer of . If the valuation on is normalized by , then . The value group of already contains both and , so its ramification index over is at least . Hence , and therefore .
Letbe the minimal polynomial of . Every conjugate of has positive valuation, so each lies in the maximal ideal of . Moreoverwhich means . Thus is an Eisenstein polynomial.
Conversely, if is a root of an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , the Eisenstein criterion makes that polynomial irreducible and its Newton polygon gives when is normalized. Consequently ; equality with the field degree forces and residue-field degree one. Thus is totally ramified.
Let and normalize . The lower ramification groups arewith . If , the same inequality defines inside , so directly
Now suppose is Finite Galois extension. The inertia group is the kernel of the action on the residue field. Restriction sends into . Conversely, the maximal unramified subextension of is the intersection of with the maximal unramified subextension of . The Galois correspondence therefore shows that the restriction image is all of .
For the explicit extension, take and a primitive cube root of unity . The polynomial is Eisenstein over , while is a ramified quadratic extension. Its splitting fieldis therefore a totally ramified extension of degree six with Galois group . With , one has and , sois a uniformizer. Let , , and let , . ThenThe two nonidentity elements of have ramification number four, whereas each transposition has ramification number one. HenceIn particular, is the wild inertia group.
The common topology determines which elements have absolute value below one, becausein that topology. It therefore also determines all comparisons: exactly when .
Choose with ; then also . For every and positive integers , the preceding observation givesThus the two real numbershave the same rational upper cuts and are equal. Settinggives for every . Hence the two absolute values are equivalent absolute values.
Suppose , so . The ultrametric inequality gives . If , thenFor a discrete valuation, only finitely many positive integers divide the fixed nonzero integer . Therefore cannot belong to , proving .
Let and choose any positive integer coprime to the residue characteristic. Forone has and . The simple-root form of Hensel lemma produces with . Infinitely many integers are coprime to the residue characteristic, so .
The valuation ring and its maximal ideal areIf is Noetherian, its maximal ideal is finitely generated. Ideals in a valuation ring are totally ordered, so every finitely generated ideal is generated by one of its generators; write . Then is the smallest positive element of the value group. Subtracting integral multiples of this value shows that every value is an integral multiple of , so is discrete.
Now assume is complete and discretely valued. Parts i and ii, applied to and to the other discrete valuation , giveIf and is a uniformizer for , then for every . Hencefor every integer , forcing and in particular . Every nonzero has the form with , soThe proportionality constant is positive because is nontrivial. Thus the valuations, and their associated absolute values, are equivalent.
One useful form of Hensel lemma is this: if is a complete discrete valuation ring, , andthen there is a unique such that and . Indeed, after constructing with , choose the unique modulo for whichand put . The resulting Cauchy sequence converges by completeness, and the same first-order congruence proves uniqueness.
Apply this to . Every nonzero class in is a simple root, so it has a unique Teichmuller representative in . These give all roots of unity of order prime to . For odd , the group has no nontrivial torsion: if , then the binomial theorem gives , which is incompatible with finite -power order. HenceFor , the subgroup is torsion-free by the same argument, while supplies the extra torsion element. Thus . This describes the roots of unity in a p-adic field for .
Suppose first that with . Divide by and put , . Reduction modulo gives . Choose an integer ; then . A unit's th power modulo depends only on its residue modulo , because . Therefore
Conversely, suppose such an integer exists. The congruence saysFor odd , the th-power map sends onto : under the p-adic logarithm it becomes multiplication by . Hence the displayed ratio is for some . Takingproduces the required solution in .
One direction follows by restriction. Conversely, suppose is a Non-Archimedean absolute value. Then for every integer . For , the binomial theorem and the ordinary triangle inequality giveTaking th roots and letting yields the ultrametric inequality for . Thus an extension of an absolute value is non-Archimedean exactly when its restriction is.
Choose a -basis of . Each extended absolute value is a norm on the finite-dimensional -vector space , and equivalence of norms in finite dimensions shows that every such norm induces the same topology when is complete. Consequently any two extended absolute values induce the same topology on . By the result of Question 2a, one is a positive real power of the other. Their restrictions to the nontrivially valued field are both , so that power is one. In particular every extension is equal, and therefore equivalent, to .
By local factorization and extended absolute values, extensions of to the number field correspond to the irreducible factors of over .
For , the polynomial is Eisenstein, hence irreducible, so there is one extension. For , a root would be a unit with , but then , not . A reducible cubic has a root, so the polynomial is again irreducible and there is one extension.
For , reduction givesThe factors are coprime, and the quadratic has discriminant , a nonsquare modulo . Hensel lemma lifts this as one linear and one irreducible quadratic factor over , giving two extensions. The requested numbers are thereforefor , respectively.
Restriction to the maximal unramified extension gives a surjectionThe abelian Weil group is the inverse image of the dense subgroup generated by Frobenius:It contains the full inertia kernel. Since is dense in , the inverse image is dense in with its profinite topology.
The translated cyclotomic polynomialis Eisenstein at . Hence generates a totally ramified extension of degreeEvery automorphism sends to for a unique . This gives an injectionand equality of orders makes it an isomorphism.
Normalize the Local Artin map so that maps to arithmetic Frobenius on the maximal unramified extension. For , define its action on bywhere using rather than gives the opposite Frobenius convention. These compatible maps, together with the image of , define reciprocity on and hence on every finite abelian extension by the Local Kronecker-Weber theorem.
Local Artin reciprocity states that the continuous maphas dense image and induces, for every finite abelian extension , an isomorphismThus the norm subgroup of a local field extension is the kernel of the Artin map restricted to .
For , the uniformizer maps to the unramified Frobenius and therefore acts trivially on the totally ramified cyclotomic extension. By part b, a unit acts trivially on exactly when . Sincethe kernel, and hence the norm subgroup, is
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.