Let be a -quasi-isometry to a tree. The image under of every geodesic segment in is a -quasigeodesic in . By the Morse lemma for quasi-geodesics, it lies within a constant of the tree geodesic with the same endpoints.
Consider a geodesic triangle in . A point on one side maps within of the corresponding side of the comparison triangle in . Every geodesic triangle in a tree is -thin, so that comparison side is contained in the other two sides. Those two tree sides are in turn within of the images of the other two sides of the original triangle. Hence some point on one of those sides satisfiesThe lower quasi-isometry inequality givesThus is Gromov-hyperbolic metric space with .
Retain the -quasi-isometry and the Morse lemma for quasi-geodesics constant . Given , let be the midpoint of a geodesic . There is a point on the tree geodesic with
For any continuous path from to , choose a partition fine enough that consecutive are at distance at most one. Consecutive images under are then at distance at mostRemoving separates from in the tree along their geodesic, so this finite -chain must contain an element within of . For the corresponding ,The lower quasi-isometry inequality yieldsThis constant depends only on the chosen quasi-isometry, so every quasi-tree has the bottleneck property.
The hyperbolic plane is a geodesic Gromov-hyperbolic metric space for some universal constant . It is not a quasi-tree. Indeed, for every , choose two points on opposite sides of a large closed metric ball centred at the midpoint of their joining geodesic. The complement of that ball in is path connected, so the endpoints can be joined by a continuous path that stays more than from the midpoint. Thus fails the bottleneck property, whereas part (b) shows that every quasi-tree satisfies it.
Fix a hyperbolicity constant for . For a prescribed , scale its distance byAll distances in every geodesic triangle, including its thinness constant, scale by . Henceis -hyperbolic. Multiplication of a metric by a fixed positive constant is a bilipschitz equivalence and hence a quasi-isometry. Therefore is quasi-isometric to and cannot be a quasi-tree. This supplies an example for every .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.