Use the Schreier coset graph of the subgroup, with one directed edge labelled from to for each . The homomorphismidentifies the cosets of with the integers. The covering graph therefore has vertices , , an -edgeand a -loop at every . Thus it is a doubly infinite -line with one -circle attached at each integer vertex.
Forthe map is surjective because . Again identify the cosets of with . The covering has vertices and directed edgesThis labelled graph is connected: integer combinations of and reach every vertex. Each vertex has one incoming and one outgoing edge of each label, as required for a covering graph of the two-petalled rose.
The based Schreier coset graph has vertices and an -edge from to . At the base vertex there is an -loop. There are no other cycles: the fundamental group of the covering is the subgroup , and its displayed loop already generates it.
Equivalently, start with one -circle at the base vertex and attach labelled trees so that every vertex has exactly one incoming and one outgoing -edge and exactly one incoming and one outgoing -edge. After deleting the base -loop, the underlying graph is a tree. This describes the complete infinite covering and distinguishes it from its finite core, which is just the -loop.
Whenever a combinatorial loop traverses an oriented edge and immediately traverses the same edge backwards, delete that backtracking pair. Each deletion is a homotopy relative to endpoints inside and reduces the edge length by two, so the process terminates at a reduced, hence locally injective, combinatorial loop .
The universal cover of a connected graph is a tree. The lift is also locally injective because a covering map is a local graph isomorphism. A locally injective edge path in a tree cannot repeat a vertex: the segment between two successive visits would be a nonempty reduced closed path, whereas every closed path in a tree backtracks. Thus is injective unless is constant.
Now let a loop in become null-homotopic in . Its reduced representative lifts to a closed path in . The preceding injectivity forces that lift, and hence , to be constant. The original loop is null-homotopic in , proving thatis an injective group homomorphism.
Choose a finite generating set for . Under the standard classification of connected covering spaces, each is represented by a based combinatorial loop in . Let be the union of the images of these finitely many finite edge paths. Then is a finite connected subgraph containing .
Part (b) makes the inclusion-induced mapinjective. Its image contains every , because every lies in , and therefore contains the subgroup they generate, namely all of . The map is consequently an isomorphism.
WriteIts Bass-Serre tree has verticesand edges , where ; the edge joins to . Sincethis is the infinite -biregular tree: every -type vertex has degree two and every -type vertex has degree three.
The HNN extension is the Baumslag-Solitar groupIts Bass-Serre tree has vertices and oriented edges , with the two endpoint maps induced by the identity embedding and the index-two embedding . At each vertex there is one incident edge on the identity side and two on the index-two side. The underlying unoriented tree is therefore infinite and -regular, with an orientation in which every vertex has one incoming and two outgoing edges, up to reversing the convention.
The relation isso is the Klein bottle group. Let it act on byThese are Euclidean isometries and satisfy . Every element has a normal form . The orbit of is discrete, and a rectangle of finite size meets every orbit, so the action is proper and cocompact.
The squareis a vertical translation, while is a horizontal translation. They commute, andas an isometry only when . Hence . The normal form shows that every element lies in either or , so this subgroup has index two in .
Introduce and . The two vertex groupsare Klein bottle groups. In , the subgroup is of index two; in , the subgroup is also of index two. IdentifyinggivesEliminating from this amalgamated free product recovers exactly the two given relators.
The Bass-Serre tree is bipartite with vertex sets and and edge set . Both edge-group inclusions have index two, so every vertex has degree two. The tree is therefore a bi-infinite line, with - and -type vertices alternating.
Use the amalgam from part (c), with edge groupAn odd power of belongs to , because is the index-two translation subgroup of the Klein bottle group . Similarly, an odd power of belongs to . Thusis a reduced alternating word whose syllables lie in and . The normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product says that every nonempty reduced alternating word is nonidentity. The displayed element is therefore nontrivial for every .
Write the generators additively in the abelianization. The relators giveandAfter substitution, the last relation becomesThe commutator relators disappear automatically, sobecause . Explicitly, an isomorphism to sends
Letbe the orientation-preserving hyperbolic triangle group. DefineEvery defining relator of maps to the identity, and lie in the image, so this is a surjective group homomorphism. Since is a non-elementary Fuchsian group.
The equality and the relator show that commutes with both and . Since , it also commutes with , and then with . Hence . Similarly, commutes with and, by , with ; it therefore commutes with and . Thus
Quotienting by givesA non-elementary Fuchsian group has trivial center: two hyperbolic elements with different pairs of boundary fixed points have only the identity in their common centralizer in . Therefore the image in the quotient of every element of is trivial. It follows that
A hyperbolic isometry of a tree has a unique invariant axis of a tree isometry, on which it acts by a nonzero translation. Let be the axis of . By part (c), is central, so for every ,Thus is another axis of . Uniqueness gives , and hence the whole group preserves the line .
Let be the common fixed subtree of the centre, which is nonempty by hypothesis and is -invariant because is central. Restrict the action to this subtree. There and act pointwise trivially, so the action factors throughIn particular, the induced tree isometries satisfy
Assume, as usual for a combinatorial tree action, that edge inversions have been removed by barycentric subdivision. The finite-order elements are then elliptic. Moreoverso each pairwise product is elliptic. Serre lemma for tree actions implies that the fixed subtrees of each pair intersect. Convex subtrees of a tree have the Helly property, soSince generate , fixes a vertex of . Thus the action of on is trivial in the tree-action sense.
Let be a -quasi-isometry to a tree. The image under of every geodesic segment in is a -quasigeodesic in . By the Morse lemma for quasi-geodesics, it lies within a constant of the tree geodesic with the same endpoints.
Consider a geodesic triangle in . A point on one side maps within of the corresponding side of the comparison triangle in . Every geodesic triangle in a tree is -thin, so that comparison side is contained in the other two sides. Those two tree sides are in turn within of the images of the other two sides of the original triangle. Hence some point on one of those sides satisfiesThe lower quasi-isometry inequality givesThus is Gromov-hyperbolic metric space with .
Retain the -quasi-isometry and the Morse lemma for quasi-geodesics constant . Given , let be the midpoint of a geodesic . There is a point on the tree geodesic with
For any continuous path from to , choose a partition fine enough that consecutive are at distance at most one. Consecutive images under are then at distance at mostRemoving separates from in the tree along their geodesic, so this finite -chain must contain an element within of . For the corresponding ,The lower quasi-isometry inequality yieldsThis constant depends only on the chosen quasi-isometry, so every quasi-tree has the bottleneck property.
The hyperbolic plane is a geodesic Gromov-hyperbolic metric space for some universal constant . It is not a quasi-tree. Indeed, for every , choose two points on opposite sides of a large closed metric ball centred at the midpoint of their joining geodesic. The complement of that ball in is path connected, so the endpoints can be joined by a continuous path that stays more than from the midpoint. Thus fails the bottleneck property, whereas part (b) shows that every quasi-tree satisfies it.
Fix a hyperbolicity constant for . For a prescribed , scale its distance byAll distances in every geodesic triangle, including its thinness constant, scale by . Henceis -hyperbolic. Multiplication of a metric by a fixed positive constant is a bilipschitz equivalence and hence a quasi-isometry. Therefore is quasi-isometric to and cannot be a quasi-tree. This supplies an example for every .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.