Suppose is a Markov chain, so . The chain rule for mutual information gives
and also
because conditional mutual information is nonnegative. Therefore . Similarly,
while , so . These are the two data processing inequalities. In particular, applying any deterministic function or Markov kernel to either argument cannot increase mutual information.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Independence makes
a Markov chain. The data processing inequality for mutual information therefore gives . Translation by the known value of is a bijection, so conditional entropy and independence give
and . Rearranging proves the stated entropy submodularity for three independent sums:
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Because the Entropic Ruzsa distance depends only on marginal distributions, take independent with the required marginals. Since is a function of , the data processing inequality for mutual information yields
The map is a bijection. Using independence and the chain rule for information entropy, the left side is
whereas the right side is . Hence
where the final step is subadditivity of information entropy. Substituting this inequality into the definition of gives the Entropic Ruzsa triangle inequality
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Let be independent, with distributed as . Apply part (b) to :
Adding an independent random variable cannot decrease information entropy, so
In terms of Entropic Ruzsa distance, this is . The Entropic Ruzsa triangle inequality and invariance under simultaneous negation now give
which is the Entropic Ruzsa sum-difference inequality.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
For independent , expand the Entropic Ruzsa sum-difference inequality from part (d):
Collecting the information entropy terms gives
Replacing by interchanges sum and difference and preserves , yielding the requested orientation
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.