Suppose is a Markov chain, so . The chain rule for mutual information givesand alsobecause conditional mutual information is nonnegative. Therefore . Similarly,while , so . These are the two data processing inequalities. In particular, applying any deterministic function or Markov kernel to either argument cannot increase mutual information.
Independence makesa Markov chain. The data processing inequality for mutual information therefore gives . Translation by the known value of is a bijection, so conditional entropy and independence giveand . Rearranging proves the stated entropy submodularity for three independent sums:
Because the Entropic Ruzsa distance depends only on marginal distributions, take independent with the required marginals. Since is a function of , the data processing inequality for mutual information yieldsThe map is a bijection. Using independence and the chain rule for information entropy, the left side iswhereas the right side is . Hencewhere the final step is subadditivity of information entropy. Substituting this inequality into the definition of gives the Entropic Ruzsa triangle inequality
Let be independent, with distributed as . Apply part (b) to :Adding an independent random variable cannot decrease information entropy, soIn terms of Entropic Ruzsa distance, this is . The Entropic Ruzsa triangle inequality and invariance under simultaneous negation now givewhich is the Entropic Ruzsa sum-difference inequality.
For independent , expand the Entropic Ruzsa sum-difference inequality from part (d):Collecting the information entropy terms givesReplacing by interchanges sum and difference and preserves , yielding the requested orientation
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.