Write the partial sums as . The series has uniform convergence to if
The same threshold must control every point of . Equivalently, the supremum error tends to zero, for nonempty .
The Weierstrass M-test states: if functions or satisfy
then has uniform convergence and absolute convergence on . In fact also has uniform convergence, since every tail is bounded by the corresponding tail of :
Take . At the point , the power series has absolute convergence, so . On the whole interval ,
The Weierstrass M-test with proves uniform convergence on . It also gives the explicit tail estimate
For the interval consists only of zero, and all positive-degree terms vanish. If , the same argument applies to every finite ; if , there is no with .
Let and let be its uniform limit. Choose a finite with for all . The partial sums of the multiplied series are , and
For any , uniform convergence supplies making for all and . The displayed estimate then gives an error less than . Thus
Choose the unbounded function on . It is unbounded because for all integers . For each , the geometric series gives the sum and its remainder after degree :
Since ,
This proves uniform convergence. Although the first term and the sum are unbounded, the late tails have a bound tending to zero independently of . Uniform convergence concerns those tails and does not require the individual functions to be bounded.
For real-valued functions, the Uniform Cauchy criterion applied to partial sums says that has uniform convergence exactly when
Sufficiency uses completeness of the real numbers.
Let be a common bound for the uniformly bounded family of functions ; increase it if necessary so that . The assumed uniform absolute convergence of gives such that
The triangle inequality now yields
The Uniform Cauchy criterion therefore proves uniform convergence of . The same estimate with proves uniform absolute convergence as well.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.