Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge / 2025 / Paper 2 / 16

For the parametric curve, ${\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }(t)=(2t,3t^2{)}^T$ andThe line integral is therefore

The relevant mixed partial derivatives agree:The vector field is smooth on the entire simply connected plane, so this condition establishes that it is a conservative vector field. We can also construct its vector-field potential explicitly. From ${\varphi }_x=y^2-2x$, take an antiderivative in $x$:Then ${\varphi }_y=2xy+h^{\prime }(y)=2xy-y$ requires $h^{\prime }(y)=-y$. HenceThe fundamental theorem for line integrals checks the previous answer: $\varphi (1,1)-\varphi (0,0)=-1/2$.

Put $\mathbf{W}=\nabla \times \mathbf{F}$ and $\mathbf{v}=\dot{\mathbf{r}}$. All vector fields and their spatial partial derivatives below are evaluated at $\mathbf{r}(t)$. The product rule for a dot product givesBecause the vector field has no explicit time dependence, the multivariable chain rule gives $d\mathbf{W}/dt=J_{\mathbf{W}}\dot{\mathbf{r}}$, where the Jacobian matrix has entries $(J_{\mathbf{W}}{)}_{ij}={\partial }_j{W}_i$. ConsequentlyThe first term measures the change of the curl sampled as the point moves; the second measures the change in the velocity vector used in the dot product.

To give the result explicitly in $P,Q,R$, define the directional derivative operator $L=\dot{x}{\partial }_x+\dot{y}{\partial }_y+\dot{z}{\partial }_z$. Sincethe same expression isFor example $L(R_y-Q_z)=\dot{x}(R_{yx}-Q_{zx})+\dot{y}(R_{yy}-Q_{zy})+\dot{z}(R_{yz}-Q_{zz})$; the other two terms expand in the same way. Thus only the first and second spatial partial derivatives of $P,Q,R$, together with the velocity and acceleration of the parametric curve, occur.