Write the increment function of the one-step method as . Its consistency error isAs , the first term tends to and the second tends to by continuity. Both limits are uniform along the exact-solution curve, a compact set: its small stage perturbations lie in a fixed compact neighborhood, so uniform continuity applies there. Thus , proving consistency for every .
By the chain rule, along the exact solution. Applying Taylor's theorem to the exact increment and the two arguments of givesThe assumed differentiability makes the remainders uniform on . Subtracting gives the consistency errorHere denotes Big O notation. The general order of a numerical method is therefore one for and at least two for . For example, on with unit initial value, . Expanding its logarithm gives , so the first-order term is actually nonzero when .
To control accumulation, the mean value theorem and the bound on givePut , and . The exact and numerical updates yield , with . Iterating this recurrence, as in the Lipschitz one-step error bound, givesBecause for , the prefactor is bounded independently of the mesh. When , the consistency error is , hence the maximum global error is . This proves at least second-order numerical convergence of the explicit midpoint method.
For and , the explicit midpoint method multiplies the current value by . Starting from one, induction givesLet and . The Taylor theorem with Lagrange remainder for the exponential function givesThe difference of powers identity gives . Every summand lies between one and . Since , the global error therefore satisfiesThe same inequalities hold at , where the error vanishes. At the fixed endpoint , the lower bound prevents any higher order of a numerical method, while the upper bound is . Thus the convergence order is exactly two.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.