In the usual real line, take for . The sets are closed, nonempty and nested, but no real number belongs to all of them.
Every is closed in the Hausdorff ambient space, because it is compact. Inside the compact space , these sets have the finite intersection property: a finite intersection equals the member with largest index and is nonempty. If the total intersection were empty, their open complements would cover ; a finite subcover would contradict that property. Thus
If no were contained in , the sets would be nonempty, nested and compact, since each is closed in . Part (i) would supply a point in , belonging to every but not to , a contradiction. Thus some , and nesting gives the same containment for every later index.
The claim is false for an arbitrary codomain . Let with its usual topology, let be the Sierpiński space with open sets , and define , for . This is a continuous map: the only nontrivial open-set preimage is , which is relatively open in .
The sets are nonempty, nested and compact. ButThus the extra generality in the printed codomain changes the assertion materially. This is the failure of nested compact image intersection without closed fibers.
If the codomain is a T1 space, the continuous images of nested compact intersections theorem does give the desired equality. The forward inclusion holds for every map. For the reverse, take and set . The fibers are closed by continuity and the T1 property, so the are nested nonempty closed subsets of the compact set . The finite intersection property gives , with . It is enough that these particular fibers be closed in ; a Hausdorff codomain, as in the native self-map formulation, is a familiar sufficient assumption.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.