In the usual real line, take for . The sets are closed, nonempty and nested, but no real number belongs to all of them.
Every is closed in the Hausdorff ambient space, because it is compact. Inside the compact space , these sets have the finite intersection property: a finite intersection equals the member with largest index and is nonempty. If the total intersection were empty, their open complements would cover ; a finite subcover would contradict that property. Thus
If no were contained in , the sets would be nonempty, nested and compact, since each is closed in . Part (i) would supply a point in , belonging to every but not to , a contradiction. Thus some , and nesting gives the same containment for every later index.
The inclusion holds for every map. Conversely, let belong to the right side. The sets are nonempty and nested. They are compact because singletons are closed in a Hausdorff space and is continuous. By part (b)(i), some lies in every . Then and , proving equality of the two sets.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.