The orbit of is , and its stabilizer is . The identity fixes ; if fix it then ; and implies . Thus is a subgroup.
On the set of left cosets , define . Given and , the element sends the first to the second. Thus the coset action is transitive. In particular the orbit of is the entire coset space, and its stabilizer is .
Two group actions on are equivalent if there is a bijection such that for all . Such a bijection is equivariant.
The orbit-stabilizer theorem in this form says that the action on is equivalent to the left coset action on , by . This map is well-defined and injective because exactly when , and it is onto by the definition of the orbit. It is equivariant by multiplication.
Thus every transitive action is a coset action. Two such actions and are equivalent exactly when are conjugate: stabilizers at different points of one orbit are conjugate, and a conjugacy explicitly supplies a coset-action equivalence. This last classification is what makes counting by orbit types possible.
A cyclic group of order six has exactly one subgroup of each order , and no others. Since it is abelian, these are also its four conjugacy classes of subgroups. Thus there is one transitive group action of each size .
An action on six points is a disjoint union of its orbits. Its equivalence type is therefore determined by nonnegative integers satisfyingIf there is one possibility. If , the possibilities allow respectively choices of , with then fixed. HenceThis is counting finite group actions by transitive orbit types. Equivalently, a generator acts as a permutation whose cycles have lengths dividing six, and these are its eight possible cycle types on six points.
The symmetric group has subgroups of orders . There is one trivial subgroup, three conjugate subgroups generated by transpositions, one order-three subgroup , and the whole group. These are all subgroups by Lagrange's theorem. Thus again there is one conjugacy class for each index .
The coset action classification in part (c) supplies exactly one transitive orbit type of each of these sizes. The same orbit-multiplicity equation as in part (i) applies, givingThe equality of the two counts comes from their identical lists of transitive orbit types, rather than from the groups being isomorphic.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.