First intensity minimum. In Fraunhofer diffraction, the path difference between adjacent slits is , so the relative wave phase is . Summing the equal complex amplitudes as a geometric series gives the diffraction grating interference factor
The central maximum has . Its nearest zero occurs at , where the denominator is nonzero. Thus
There is a symmetric first zero on each side of the incident direction. The narrow slits are treated as having a sufficiently broad single-slit diffraction envelope.
Wavelength resolution and the missing order specification. Adopt the Rayleigh criterion: the principal maximum of one wavelength lies at the adjacent minimum of the other in the same nonzero diffraction order . For and , those directions obey
Consequently the ideal resolving power of a diffraction grating is , giving
The usual first-order reading therefore gives . Zero diffraction order cannot separate the two wavelengths, because both central maxima coincide.
The paper does not specify which diffraction order is observed, so is not an order-independent minimum. In the ideal infinitely narrow-slit model, the largest usable order for this positive wavelength separation must satisfy . Since , this permits , giving the formal all-order result
That pair meets the criterion at . Order of is at grazing incidence and the corresponding longer-wavelength peak cannot propagate. In a real device, finite slit width, weak high-order intensity and screen acceptance may prevent such an extreme order from being used; those data are absent. Thus the specified-order expression, and when first order is intended, are the defensible resolution answers under the stated criterion.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.