Put and . The detector rotation is real and orthogonal, so its inverse is the same transformation. Substituting it gives
Thus the requested orthonormal system states are
The pure density operator has not changed: this is only a different Schmidt decomposition of a maximally entangled state. But choosing a nonselective projective measurement in this new detector basis gives a different operation and generally a different state:
For an explicit matrix in the original ordered basis, write and . Then
At the entries and are , whereas they vanish in . Nevertheless, the system and detector individually each have reduced density matrix for either mixture.
This is the preferred-basis problem: the correlated state alone does not specify which detector observable becomes a stable classical record. Arbitrarily declaring collapse in a Schmidt basis changes the physical prediction. The actual detector interaction and environment must supply the basis selection, rather than a mere choice of notation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.