Choose an orthonormal eigenbasis and the phase convention . Comparing coefficients of the eigenvalue equation at first order yieldsProjecting onto and the other eigenvectors givesProjection of the next-order equation onto givesThese are coefficients of the printed series, so denotes the quadratic coefficient rather than the second derivative itself. Without a phase convention an arbitrary purely imaginary multiple of can be added to the first vector correction. Continuous spectrum, if present, requires the corresponding spectral integral; the oscillator has a discrete complete eigenbasis.
Put and let denote the ground-state density. Then and . Because , integration by parts yieldsThus the two first-order shifts areThe first is the supplied ground-state expression; the second follows because the excited-state density is , so .
Subtracting, and using , givesThe bracket is zero at , tends to one at infinity, and has derivative . Therefore the first-order predicted level gap isFor every it becomes negative for all sufficiently large , crossing when . It is still positive at : the stated conclusion must be read with the large- regime, rather than for every interval width.
For the inner potential curves downward, placing a central barrier between two symmetric minima at . The even unperturbed ground state has its greatest density at the central barrier, while the odd first excited state has a node there and is less penalized. This explains the relative first-order shifts. A negative predicted gap signals failure of that perturbation approximation, not inversion of the exact lowest two states: the true one-dimensional ground state remains nodeless and even, with the odd state above it. At a high barrier the actual low levels instead form a close double-well pair. The apparent level crossing from a finite-interval oscillator perturbation is useful precisely as a diagnostic of the approximation's range.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.