Homogeneity makes the inertial transformation linear. Align origins at , let the second origin have velocity , and impose isotropy and reciprocity. Then , , . If the same limiting signal speed has trajectories in both systems, substituting these two trajectories fixes . Requiring the inverse to have the same form with fixes . Continuity at rest selects the positive square root:
Light enters this derivation through the empirical/in-principle operational identification of the invariant speed and Einstein synchronization. Group, homogeneity and isotropy arguments can instead derive a family with a universal parameter , and . They do not by themselves determine whether or a positive finite value. Empirical light propagation or other relativistic dynamics identifies for our world. Consequently a derivation need not assume light as its first premise, but it must acquire the physical invariant-speed structure somewhere rather than extract it from linearity alone.[ref]
In this argument, homogeneity, isotropy, equivalence of inertial frames and the existence/identification of an invariant speed are physical structural posits. Coordinate origins, axis orientation and clock-unit choices are conventions. Einstein synchronization stipulates equal one-way signal times for outward and return paths; the empirical two-way light behavior and material-clock comparisons are not made true merely by that stipulation. Other synchronization coordinates can describe the same operational observations with a different displayed one-way light speed and transformed formula. Distinguishing those choices from the physical invariant structure is essential to the derivation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.