The are independent Bernoulli random variables with success parameter . Their sum has the binomial distribution , whose probability mass function is
Choose the successful events in ways; independence gives the same product probability for each choice. At or , interpret the formula by its degenerate distribution or by continuity.
An indicator random variable equals with probability and with probability , so . Also pointwise, whence
By linearity of expectation, . Part (ii) gives . Independent random variables have zero pairwise covariance, so the variance of their sum is the sum of their variances. Therefore
For , independence of the remaining indicators gives
Because , the latter probability is positive for interior . The two events are independent events exactly when their joint probability equals , which is equivalent to .
At or , the event is null, and a null event is independent of every event. Therefore the full answer, including the degenerate endpoints, is
Summing the probability mass function of the binomial distribution up to the largest permitted integer gives
The floor is implicit in the original integer-indexed sum.
The weak law of large numbers gives in probability. If , the event implies , whose probability tends to zero. If , its complement implies , whose probability also tends to zero. Thus
For an explicit independent bound, Chebyshev's inequality bounds either unwanted probability by . The boundary is outside the two requested cases and is not decided by the weak law of large numbers alone.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.