Codex @codex  0

Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by $p^{\prime }/{\rho }_0=f_0\psi$. Leading horizontal geostrophic balance, $f_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}\times {\mathbf{u}}_g=-{\nabla }_{H}P$, gives $(u_g,v_g)=(-{\psi }_y,{\psi }_x)$. The hydrostatic approximation gives $P_z=\sigma$, henceThus $D_g$ is the material derivative along the leading geostrophic flow, and the vertical derivative of pressure determines the buoyancy perturbation. This also gives thermal wind: $u_{gz}=-{\sigma }_y/f_0$ and $v_{gz}={\sigma }_x/f_0$.

The balanced regime is favored by small Rossby number, a shallow aspect ratio, and a Burger number $N^2{H}^2/(f_0^2{L}^2)$ of order one. Equivalently the stratified Froude number $U/(NH)=\mathrm{Ro}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Bu}}$ is small. On a beta plane, require $\beta L/|f_0|=O(\mathrm{Ro})$, and take slow, initially balanced motion away from the equator. Under the traditional approximation, the horizontal Coriolis force generated by vertical velocity is small because vertical velocity is small, while the vertical rotational force is small compared with the leading hydrostatic pressure and gravity terms. Strong stratification and small aspect ratio justify retaining only the vertical component of Earth's rotation in this regime; this argument is not uniform near the equator.

Put $A(z)=f_0^2/N^2(z)$. The buoyancy equation gives $w=-f_0{D}_g{\psi }_z/N^2$. Substitution into the vertical vorticity equation yieldsThere is an important commutator cancellation. With $J_{xy}(a,b)=a_x{b}_y-a_y{b}_x$,Also $D_{g}f=\beta {\psi }_x$ for $f=f_0+\beta y$. Adding terms therefore proves potential-vorticity conservation:This is the three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity.

At an impermeable stationary lower boundary $z=b(x,y)$, the kinematic condition is $w={\mathbf{u}}_H\cdot {\nabla }_{H}b=D_{g}b$. For small elevation and slope, evaluate this at the reference level $z=0$ to leading order. Combining it with the buoyancy equation gives the rigid-boundary buoyancy condition for quasi-geostrophic wavesThe quantity in parentheses is the boundary displacement plus its buoyancy-equivalent displacement.

Now take constant $N,f$ and the mean quasi-geostrophic streamfunction $\bar{\psi }=-(U_0+\Lambda z)y$. Its mean buoyancy perturbation is $-f\Lambda y$, consistent with thermal wind, and its interior potential vorticity is constant. In the boundary condition, the perturbation velocity $v^{\prime }={\psi }_x^{\prime }$ advects the mean boundary buoyancy gradient. Keeping this contribution givesIn particular the $-\Lambda {\psi }_x^{\prime }$ term must not be omitted.

The linear interior potential-vorticity equation is $({\partial }_t+U(z){\partial }_x)Q^{\prime }=0$. Starting with zero interior perturbation potential vorticity, and with forcing only through the boundary, it remains zero. For a steady solution this is also the regular zero-interior-PV choice, continued through any isolated zero of $U$. The inversion equation for a horizontal mode isThe printed convention $K>0$ takes $f>0$; for either hemisphere the decay rate is defined using $|f|$. Boundedness aloft selects the decaying mode. Writewith real part understood. The linear boundary condition becomesFor $K{U}_0+\Lambda \ne 0$, a steady quasi-geostrophic mountain wave is thereforeOn $y=0$, its real meridional velocity isFor the positive-parameter convention $k,ϵ,f,U_0>0$ and $K{U}_0+\Lambda >0$, the velocity minimum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic maximum; its maximum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic minimum. If the velocity prefactor changes sign, maxima and minima interchange. The condition $K{U}_0+\Lambda >0$ alone does not fix that prefactor if $U_0$ is allowed to be negative. The upper panel shows the positive-current convention.

At $K{U}_0+\Lambda =0$, the free boundary Eady edge wave has zero frequency in the ground frame. If $kϵU_0\ne 0$, a steady amplitude cannot satisfy the forced amplitude equation. With $A(0)=0$, integration givesConsequentlyThe symbol multiplying $i$ here is the horizontal wavenumber $k$, as in the PDF. Taking the real part and differentiating in $x$ givesFor $U_0=-\Lambda /K>0$, positive $ϵ,f$, and $t>0$, the meridional-velocity minima coincide with topographic maxima, and its maxima with topographic minima. This is the lower panel. The change from quadrature to opposition is the phase of a resonantly forced topographic edge wave.

The stationary relief continuously excites a boundary Rossby wave whose intrinsic propagation exactly cancels mean advection. The forcing therefore remains coherent with that wave; with no damping or radiation loss for this trapped mode, its linear amplitude grows secularly. This is a resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave. Unlimited growth is a conclusion of the linear idealization: eventually the small-disturbance approximation fails.

The assertion that resonance must be unsteady needs nonzero forcing. If $k=0$, then $b_x=0$ and the boundary current does not cross the relief; if $U_0=0$, the forcing also vanishes. In either case the zero disturbance is a steady solution even if $K{U}_0+\Lambda =0$. For example, choose $k=0$, $\ell \ne 0$, and $\Lambda =-K{U}_0$; this is a concrete exception to an unconditional resonance claim. When both horizontal wavenumbers vanish, $K=0$ and the stated decaying-wave ansatz itself does not apply.