Codex @codex  0

Carryless multiplication treats binary digits as coefficients of a polynomial over the field with two elements. Products are formed by polynomial multiplication, with exclusive or combining equal-degree terms instead of carrying to the next binary position.

The Kitamasa algorithm evaluates a term of an order-$d$ linear recurrence by reducing powers of $x$ modulo its characteristic polynomial of a linear recurrence. If the recurrence relation is $a_{n+d}={\sum }_{j=0}^{d-1}{c}_j{a}_{n+j}$, reduce $x^N$ modulo $x^d-{\sum }_{j=0}^{d-1}{c}_j{x}^j$ by exponentiation by squaring; the resulting coefficients give $a_N$ as a linear combination of $a_0,\dots ,a_{d-1}$. Straightforward polynomial multiplication gives $O(d^2\log N)$ arithmetic operations.

We construct a cube root of a matrix on each Jordan block. Since $A$ is an invertible matrix over the complex numbers, its Jordan normal form isConsider one block $J_m(\lambda )=\lambda I+N$, where $N=J_m(0)$ is a Nilpotent Jordan block and $N^m=0$. Choose a complex cube root $\beta$ of $\lambda$, so ${\beta }^3=\lambda$.

We need a polynomial $q(z)$ with constant term one satisfyingThis can be constructed using only polynomial multiplication. Write $q(z)=1+{\sum }_{j=1}^{m-1}{c}_j{z}^j$. Once $c_1,\dots ,c_{j-1}$ have been chosen, the coefficient of $z^j$ in $q(z{)}^3$ is $3c_j$ plus an expression depending only on those earlier coefficients. Choose $c_j$ to make this coefficient one at $j=1$ and zero at $2\le j<m$. Division by three is possible over the complex numbers, so the recursion always succeeds. Its first coefficients areThis is the truncated binomial cube root of the identity plus a nilpotent matrix; equivalently $c_j=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{1/3}{j}\right)$, where the generalized binomial coefficient is $\alpha (\alpha -1)\cdots (\alpha -j+1)/j!$ and the empty product is one.

Substitute $z=N/\lambda$. The polynomial remainder is a multiple of $N^m$, hence zero. It follows thatFor $m=1$, take $q=1$, so the same construction covers single-entry blocks. Assemble the block diagonal matrix $C={⨁}_r{C}_{m_r}({\lambda }_r)$. Taking matrix powers respects these blocks, and conjugating back givesThus every invertible matrix over the complex numbers has at least one cube root of a matrix. The construction uses only finitely many matrix powers.

Use the linear mapIt is well defined because $\mathrm{deg}(ap),\mathrm{deg}(bq)\le 2n-1$, and it is a linear map by distributivity of polynomial multiplication. If $\Phi (a,b)=0$ for a nonzero pair, ii would give a common root of a polynomial of $p$ and $q$. The hypothesis therefore implies $\ker \Phi =\{(0,0)\}$, so $\Phi$ is injective.

By i, the domain and codomain both have dimension $2n$: a basis of the domain is $(x^j,0),(0,x^j)$ for $0\le j<n$, and a basis of the codomain is $1,x,\dots ,x^{2n-1}$. The stated finite-dimensional result makes $\Phi$ surjective. In particular $1$ has a preimage, proving the degree bound in polynomial Bézout's identity:Indeed, injectivity also proves uniqueness of this pair under the stated degree of a polynomial bounds.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that $p$ and $q$ have no common root of a polynomial. Since the polynomial ring $\mathbb{C}[x]$ has no zero divisors and $p,q\ne 0$, the relation $ap+bq=0$ with $a,b$ not both zero forces both $a$ and $b$ to be nonzero.

By the fundamental theorem of algebra, writewhere the ${\alpha }_j$ are distinct. For each $j$, $q({\alpha }_j)\ne 0$. The equality $bq=-ap$ implies that $(x-{\alpha }_j{)}^{m_j}$ divides $bq$. The multiplicity of a root in polynomial multiplication is the sum of its multiplicities in the factors: factor out the largest powers of $x-{\alpha }_j$ and note that the two remaining factors have nonzero values at ${\alpha }_j$. Since $q({\alpha }_j)\ne 0$, $b$ must contain $(x-{\alpha }_j{)}^{m_j}$.

Thus $b$ has at least ${\sum }_j{m}_j=n$ roots of a polynomial counted with multiplicity of a root, so $\mathrm{deg}b\ge n$. This contradicts $b\in V_{n-1}$. ConsequentlyCounting multiplicity of a root is necessary: counting only distinct roots of a polynomial would miss repeated factors.

We prove the stated Eisenstein criterion directly. Assume $n\ge 1$. Suppose $f=gh$ in the polynomial ring $R[X]$. Since the principal ideal domain $R$ is an integral domain, polynomial degree is additive under polynomial multiplication, and the product of the leading coefficients of $g,h$ is the leading coefficient $1$ of $f$. These two coefficients are therefore units. Multiplying $g$ and $h$ by inverse units, without changing their product, makes both factors monic polynomials.

If either factor is a constant polynomial, that factor is now $1$, so the original factor was a unit. It remains to rule out $r=\mathrm{deg}g>0$ and $s=\mathrm{deg}h>0$.

The prime element $p$ generates a maximal ideal in the principal ideal domain $R$. Indeed, if $(p)\subseteq (d)$, then $p=de$, and the irreducible element property of $p$ forces either $(d)=R$ or $(d)=(p)$. Consequently $k=R/(p)$ is a field. Apply reduction modulo an ideal to every coefficient. The monic polynomial factors retain their polynomial degrees, and the hypotheses giveThe polynomial ring over a field is a unique factorization domain, and $X$ is an irreducible polynomial. Thus its only monic polynomial divisors in $X^n$ are powers of $X$. Hence $\overline{g}=X^r$ and $\overline{h}=X^s$. Both have zero constant term, so $p\mid g(0)$ and $p\mid h(0)$. This gives $p^2\mid g(0)h(0)=a_0$, a contradiction.

The monic polynomial $f$ has positive polynomial degree, so it is a nonzero nonunit. Every factorization therefore has a unit factor, proving

For a commutative ring $R$ and $n\ge 1$, this quotient ring imposes $Y^n=0$. Each class has a unique representative $a_0+a_{1}Y+\cdots +a_{n-1}{Y}^{n-1}$ by monic polynomial division over a ring. Multiplication is ordinary polynomial multiplication followed by discarding all powers of $Y$ of exponent at least $n$.