Lüders rule Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-14
The Lüders rule specifies the ideal quantum instrument for a projective measurement. Conditional on an outcome with nonzero probability, it givesfor a density operator and a pure state, respectively. The second formula applies only to a pure state input. If the result is discarded, the output is the nonselective projective measurement .
The crucial feature for a degenerate eigenvalue is preservation of quantum coherence within its eigenspace. For a qutrit with orthonormal basis , considerOn , outcome zero has probability one and the Lüders rule leaves unchanged. Measuring all three rank-one projectors and then forgetting whether the label was zero or one instead givesBoth procedures always report the coarse value zero, but a subsequent test with projector succeeds with probability one for the first and one half for the second. Resolving extra information destroyed coherence. This explains why a quantum nondemolition measurement of a degenerate quantity must specify what information the apparatus actually records.
Gerhart Lüders proposed this state-change rule in 1951, explicitly discussing degenerate quantities and distinguishing selected subensembles from the aggregate measured ensemble. Kirkpatrick's translation was first posted in 2004; equations (7) and (8) give the unnormalized selective update and the nonselective update. [ref]
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0403007. Lüders, 1951, translated by Kirkpatrick, 2004
.Repeatability follows briefly from : after outcome , . This assumes a second application of the same ideal instrument without intervening dynamics. An instrument with the same effects can rotate or reset the output and need not satisfy this conclusion; see POVM does not determine the post-measurement state.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 32 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The generalized measurement postulate specifies operators with . On a density matrix , the outcome probability and conditional state areThe probabilities are nonnegative and sum to one. More generally an outcome may contain several Kraus operators , in which case one sums over in both formulas. A projective measurement with the usual Lüders update is the special case , where , and . Projection-valued effects alone fix the projective outcome probabilities, but an additional outcome-dependent unitary can change the conditional state; for the standard projective update the measurement operators themselves are the projectors.
A POVM is a family of positive effects summing to . Its probabilities are . A generalized measurement gives effects , or . Conversely realizes any POVM. The POVM does not determine the post-measurement state: different operators with these same effects have the same probabilities and can have different state updates.
A pure POVM has rank-one nonzero effects, , with normalized pure states and positive . Here pure means rank-one effects, not the different property of extremality in the convex set of POVMs.
The POVM–ensemble duality for the maximally mixed state is a bijection between POVMs in dimension and ensemble decompositions of . Given effects , setomitting zero effects. Each is a density matrix, , andConversely, if an ensemble satisfies , then are positive and sum to , hence form a POVM. Taking traces recovers the original probabilities, so the transformations are inverse. Pure POVMs correspond exactly to pure-state ensemble decompositions of the maximally mixed state. For such a POVM, and ; it need not be an orthogonal measurement.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 33 5 b i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a register with orthonormal basis for Alice's classical symbol, the transmitted system, and a register initially in a fixed blank state. The initial classical-quantum state isA POVM fixes probabilities but not a unique conditional state of . Choose the Lüders rule instrument , which satisfies . Record outcome in orthogonal states of and retain the corresponding quantum output . The final nonselective state isThe positive operators in this sum are unnormalized: their traces already include the outcome probabilities. If , the normalized conditional state of is .
More generally, an instrument may use operators with , replacing by . All subsequent classical information bounds are unchanged. This explicitly accounts for the fact that a POVM does not determine the post-measurement state of a retained quantum system.
Positive operator-valued measure Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-14
A positive operator-valued measure is a family of positive operators satisfying . Each is called an effect and determines a probability for input density operator . The effects need not be orthogonal projections or commute. This permits measurements with more outcomes than the dimension of the Hilbert space, such as the trine qubit POVM. Coupling to a quantum ancilla and measuring the larger system supplies a physical route to generalized measurements. [ref]
https://www.preskill.caltech.edu/ph229/notes/chap3.pdf. Preskill, Quantum Information, §§3.1.2–3.1.4
.For an elementary unsharp example on a qubit, takeOn the eigenstate , ; at they are and . At the outcome is a fair coin independent of the input, and at these effects specify a sharp projective measurement. Choosing specifies one quantum instrument, but for outcome-dependent unitary operators has the same effects and different state updates. Thus POVM does not determine the post-measurement state.