The Euler-Lagrange equation has the first integral
where the constant follows from the initial data. Combining this with proper-time normalization gives the Timelike geodesic in the expanding flat slicing of de Sitter spacetime:
Consequently
Integrating from , where , gives
As , the first ratio tends to , so
Thus tends to at the finite proper time .
For an affine parameter , the geodesic Lagrangian is
Varying gives the geodesic equations
The rotational Killing vector fields of the spherical symmetry conserve the angular-momentum vector. Its direction is fixed, so every nonradial orbit lies in the plane through the symmetry centre orthogonal to that vector. A spatial rotation can make this the equatorial plane. Equivalently, the initial conditions and solve the equation uniquely. This is the planarity of geodesics in spherical symmetry; a radial geodesic has zero angular momentum and may be assigned any plane.
On , the cyclic coordinates and produce geodesic conserved quantities from Killing vectors,
For a timelike geodesic parametrized by proper time, the proper-time normalization is . Substitution of and gives the first-order radial equation
This is the timelike geodesic effective potential for static Anti-de Sitter spacetime with curvature radius one.
A geodesic passing through must have . If it moves away from the origin, , and
Taking proper time at departure gives
It turns around at and first returns to the origin at
This energy-independent refocusing is the characteristic radial timelike geodesic in anti-de Sitter spacetime result; for curvature radius , the answer is .
The initial data and give . To first order in , replace and on the right-hand sides of the transverse equations by and . Twice integrating with the initial rest conditions gives
For , define and . Then
Hence
These permanent changes are forms of displacement memory and velocity memory.
There is a discrepancy in the question's final instruction. The longitudinal equation actually gives
and therefore
Thus does not vanish to first order for a general allowed profile. It vanishes after the pulse under the additional hypothesis used in part (iv), but it need not vanish while that pulse is passing. The proper-time normalization independently gives the same relation .