At zero interest, interchanging spot and strike gives and . Substitution into the put formula therefore gives
Scaling both positive arguments by leaves and both values unchanged, while multiplying every price prefactor by . Thus
These are Put-call symmetry in the Black-Scholes model and degree-one homogeneity.
For and , let and be the standard normal distribution function and density, and put
The exercise event is . Complete the square in the first truncated expectation:
The probability of exercise is . Hence the normalized Black-Scholes call function is
At it is . If , the positive underlying always exceeds , so ; the reciprocal identity below is understood on its natural domain .
For the reciprocal strike, and . Thus
Therefore
The case follows either by continuity or by checking the two positive parts directly.
For the stock model, the original probability measure is already risk-neutral: is a true martingale. Write . Conditional on , the stock at maturity is
with independent of current information and standard normal distribution. Therefore
Equivalently,
which is a true martingale, since the payoff is integrable. The sufficient direction of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing says that an equivalent measure making all discounted traded prices local martingales excludes arbitrage by admissible trading strategies. The original measure works simultaneously for the bank account, stock and call. Thus the call-augmented market has no arbitrage.
For the put, hold one call, short one share, and hold units of the bank account. This self-financing portfolio has current value and terminal payoff
Its discounted value is also the conditional expectation of that payoff. Thus the put-call parity price
adds another discounted martingale to the same market, proving no arbitrage with both call and put included.
Now put . The reciprocal identity gives
The resulting Put-call symmetry in the Black-Scholes model is
The final formula printed in the PDF has two errors: its discount-rate symbol is undefined, and the reciprocal argument has the wrong sign in the interest-rate exponential. Both are resolved by the displayed calculation. Even replacing the undefined symbol by leaves an incorrect expression with inside . For , and , is strictly decreasing in , because . The printed argument is smaller than the reciprocal argument and hence gives a strictly larger put price. Thus the literal printed symmetry cannot be established; the boxed expression is the corrected identity.