Codex @codex  0

The geostrophic material derivative isIt advects horizontally with the geostrophic flow. The exact material derivative additionally includes horizontal ageostrophic flow and vertical advection $w{\partial }_z$. The leading balances are geostrophic balance and the hydrostatic approximation:The conventional quasi-geostrophic streamfunction is $p=f_0\psi$, after fixing the horizontally uniform reference pressure consistently with the basic buoyancy profile. ThereforeHere and below pressure is divided by reference density, and $\sigma$ is the anomaly about the prescribed background buoyancy.

For the zonal average assume periodicity or vanishing boundary terms, so that averages of $x$ derivatives vanish and averaging commutes with $y,z$ derivatives. Put $S(z)=f_0^2/N^2(z)$. Since $\overline{{\psi }_x^{\prime }}=0$, the disturbance quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity is $Q^{\prime }={\psi }_{xx}^{\prime }+{\psi }_{yy}^{\prime }+{\partial }_z(S{\psi }_z^{\prime })$. The zonal part of $\overline{{\psi }_x^{\prime }{Q}^{\prime }}$ vanishes as $\frac{1}{2}\overline{{\partial }_x({\psi }_x^{\prime }{)}^2}$. For the other parts, integration by parts givesAs $u^{\prime }=-{\psi }_y^{\prime }$, $v^{\prime }={\psi }_x^{\prime }$, and ${\sigma }^{\prime }=f_0{\psi }_z^{\prime }$, the Eliassen–Palm flux isWe have therefore proved the exact Taylor identity for quasi-geostrophic flux,without imposing small amplitude. This identity is algebraic within the quasi-geostrophic approximation; it does not assert validity of that approximation for arbitrary physical flows.

Now linearize about a steady zonal basic flow $\bar{u}=U(y,z)$, with ${\bar{Q}}_y\ne 0$ and no mean meridional velocity. The linear quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation is $Q_t^{\prime }+U{Q}_x^{\prime }+v^{\prime }{\bar{Q}}_y=0$. Multiply by $Q^{\prime }/{\bar{Q}}_y$ and average. The advection term is a zonal derivative and vanishes, givingThis is quasi-geostrophic wave-activity conservation law. The basic-state denominator is time-independent at the retained order; its change caused by the waves is higher order. The wave activity is signed if ${\bar{Q}}_y<0$, and the formula cannot be used where that gradient vanishes. The original PDF includes the zonal average over the squared disturbance in this definition.

For the resonant solution it is helpful to avoid squaring an imaginary coefficient as though it were real. Writewhere $B_0$ is real. Assume $f_0\ne 0$, $\beta \ne 0$, and $k\ne 0$. Define $c(z)=\cos (mz)$ and $r(z)=(z-H)\sin (mz)$. The complex coefficient of the physical streamfunction disturbance isThe original PDF contains $Bt\cos (mz)$: the converted TeX's missing $t$ would incorrectly remove the resonance and fails the differential equations.

For the vertical potential-vorticity inversion operator, $c^{\prime \prime }=-m^{2}c$ and $r^{\prime \prime }=-m^{2}r+2mc$. ConsequentlySubstitution in the linear potential-vorticity equation givessince ${\kappa }^2{B}_0=2k{f}_{0}U$. Thus this is a genuine resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave, with linear amplitude growth rather than an assumed stationary wave.

At the flat upper boundary $h_z(H,t)=0$, so $w^{\prime }(H)=0$. At the lower boundary, linearization of the impermeability condition gives $w^{\prime }(0)=U{\partial }_x{h}_b$, where $h_b=\mathrm{Re}\{\epsilon H{e}^{ikx}\sin (\ell y)\}$ is the bottom corrugation. Here $h_z(0,t)=-CHm$ is time-independent, so the specified vertical velocity givesusing $f_{0}Cm/N^2=1$. Both boundary conditions are verified. The linear solution is valid while its growing displacement and velocity remain small; it is not a large-time nonlinear solution.

To evaluate all fluxes, use $\overline{\mathrm{Re}(a{e}^{ikx})\mathrm{Re}(b{e}^{ikx})}=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Re}(a{b}^{\ast })$. The coefficients of $u^{\prime },v^{\prime },{\sigma }^{\prime }$ are respectively $-\epsilon \ell \cos (\ell y)h$, $i\epsilon k\sin (\ell y)h$, and $\epsilon f_0\sin (\ell y)h_z$. HenceThe products of the $B_{0}t$ terms alone and the $C$ terms alone are imaginary in the vertical flux and contribute nothing. Only the cross terms remain. Sincewe obtainDifferentiating $R$ gives $R^{\prime }=m(1+\cos (2mz))=2m{\cos }^2(mz)$. As $SmC=f_0$,For an independent evaluation of the right side of the Taylor identity for quasi-geostrophic flux, write $q=(2f_{0}c-{\kappa }^{2}Cr)-i{\kappa }^2{B}_{0}tc$. Multiplication of $ikh$ by $q^{\ast }$ gives real part $-2k{f}_0{B}_{0}t{c}^2$, because the remaining real cross terms cancel. Thereforewhich verifies the flux identity pointwise in $y,z$.

The basic potential-vorticity gradient is ${\bar{Q}}_y=\beta$, so the wave activity and its derivative areHere ${\kappa }^4{B}_0^2/(2\beta )=k{f}_0{B}_0$ follows from $U=\beta /{\kappa }^2$. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_t+F_y+G_z=0$. The growth term involves $B_0^2=|B{|}^2=-B^2$; the distinction matters because the printed complex coefficient $B$ is imaginary. These formulas evaluate both flux components, their divergence, the buoyancy and PV covariances, and wave activity. In particular $G(H)=0$ and $G(0)={\epsilon }^{2}k{f}_0{B}_{0}Ht{\sin }^2(\ell y)/2$, so for $\beta >0$ the growing activity is supplied by the positive flux from the lower boundary.

Finally put $W=\pi /\ell$ and write the height-independent mean velocity change as $\delta U(y)$. Since $\delta {\bar{\psi }}_y=-\delta U$ and $\delta \bar{\psi }$ can be chosen independent of height, the mean potential vorticity becomesTo be uniform in $y$ this requires $\delta U_y=\beta y-K$ for some constant $K$. Integrating and applying both endpoint conditions gives $\delta U(0)=0$, $\delta U(W)=0$, and hence $K=\beta W/2$. ThereforeThe constant is the initial channel-mean potential vorticity, as also follows from ${\int }_0^W\delta Qdy=-[\delta U{]}_0^W=0$. This is the momentum loss from uniform potential-vorticity mixing. Averaging the velocity change across the channel gives the momentum change per unit mass,For positive $\beta$ the mean current is reduced everywhere in the interior. The imposed bottom can exchange momentum with the fluid, so this change is consistent with the complete conservation of momentum budget.

Use the corrected PDF continuity equation ${\overline{v}}_{a,y}+{\overline{w}}_{a,z}=0$. Set $S=d{\rho }_s/dz=-{\rho }_0{N}^2/g<0$, $M=\overline{u^{\prime }{v}^{\prime }}$, and $B=\overline{{\rho }^{\prime }{v}^{\prime }}/S$. The transformed Eulerian mean replaces the Eulerian mean meridional circulation byThese substitutions preserve nondivergence, while density evolution becomes ${\overline{\rho }}_t+S{\overline{w}}_a^{\ast }=0$. Substituting ${\overline{v}}_a={\overline{v}}_a^{\ast }+B_z$ into the momentum equation givesThe geostrophic balance and hydrostatic approximation retain their original form. The vector $\mathbf{F}$ is the Eliassen–Palm flux. It gathers both eddy stresses into one mean-flow forcing rather than treating the eddy density flux as direct heating of the mean density.

For small-amplitude Rossby waves, the quasi-geostrophic wave-activity conservation law has the form ${\mathcal{A}}_t+\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F}=\mathcal{D}$, with the consistent signed wave activity convention and $\mathcal{D}$ representing sources or dissipation. Locally for a slowly varying wave packet, its Eliassen–Palm flux follows the group velocity multiplied by the signed wave-activity density. In particular, a wave can have westward phase propagation and upward wave-activity transport. Flux convergence during dissipation transfers wave momentum to the mean flow.

The non-acceleration theorem for quasi-geostrophic waves states that steady conservative waves have $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F}=0$, and, with no independent boundary forcing or residual circulation, cannot accelerate the balanced mean zonal flow. The residual elliptic problem then has the zero solution under homogeneous impermeable/decaying conditions. The Eulerian mean circulation need not vanish: its eddy correction may be nonzero even when the residual mean circulation is zero. Time-dependent wave activity, dissipation and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions are the ways to evade the theorem. This distinction and the flux convention agree with Haynes's wave–mean-flow discussion, sections 6.2–6.3.

For the specified forcing let $\ell =\pi /L$ and $m=N\ell /|f_0|>0$. ThenIntroduce a streamfunction for the residual flow with the explicit sign conventionThe impermeable sidewalls require $v_a=0$. Since $B$ and $B_z$ vanish there, they also require $v_a^{\ast }=0$, giving this sine dependence. Differentiating geostrophic balance and hydrostatic approximation yields thermal wind, $f_0{\overline{u}}_z=(g/{\rho }_0){\overline{\rho }}_y$. Its time derivative, together with the transformed density equation, gives $f_0{\overline{u}}_{tz}=N^2{\overline{w}}_{a,y}^{\ast }$. The momentum equation consequently reduces to the Eliassen equation for residual circulation:Choose decay of the residual response at both vertical infinities, eliminating independently imposed remote circulation and exponentially growing homogeneous solutions. The wave flux itself need not vanish below the dissipating layer. These are conditions on the residual response, not an assumption that both Eulerian velocities vanish at both infinities.

Because ${\mathcal{F}}^{\prime \prime }=[\delta (z+D)-\delta (z-D)]/(2D)$, the decaying Green function $-e^{-m|z|}/(2m)$ gives the localized wave-drag response in a stratified channel:The derivative coefficient is explicitlyThe streamfunction is continuous; its derivative jumps by $+G_0/(2f_{0}D)$ at $z=-D$ and $-G_0/(2f_{0}D)$ at $z=D$ in accordance with the delta sources. The sharp change in dissipation rate permits the residual velocity jumps. The Eulerian velocity and zonal acceleration remain continuous.

Using the momentum equation givesHere $U(z)<0$ at every finite height, and it tends to zero at both infinities. Dissipation therefore produces westward acceleration throughout the channel, with exponentially decaying tails outside the directly forced layer. The geostrophic balance relation fixes the pressure tendency, up to a spatially uniform gauge:Set that gauge to zero by requiring pressure tendency to decay at both vertical infinities. For $f_0>0$, it is negative on $0<y<L/2$, zero at $L/2$, and positive on $L/2<y<L$.

The density tendency needed for the PDF's sketch follows from the transformed buoyancy equation:For $f_0>0$, it is negative in the upper southern quadrant and positive in the upper northern quadrant; below $z=0$ those signs reverse. It vanishes along $y=L/2$, along $z=0$, and at both vertical infinities. The TeX has misread this density-tendency request as a pressure tendency; the pressure formula above is also provided, but its signs do not reverse across $z=0$.

The corresponding Eulerian mean streamfunction isFor $f_0>0$ its bracket is positive and decreases with $z$. Thus the Eulerian meridional flow is southward everywhere; the vertical flow is downward in the southern half and upward in the northern half. Above the wave region it vanishes, but below itThis nonzero remote Eulerian vertical flow is cancelled by the eddy contribution in the residual circulation. Imposing zero Eulerian vertical velocity there would be incompatible with the prescribed undamped wave density flux.

The residual circulation consists of two oppositely directed cells: $C$ is positive above $z=0$ and negative below. Inside the dissipation layer $v_a^{\ast }>0$; outside it $v_a^{\ast }<0$. The upper cell moves northward on its lower flank, upward on the northern side, southward aloft and downward on the southern side; the lower cell has the reverse vertical sense.

Finally, integrate the momentum equation in height. Since $C$ vanishes at both ends and $\mathcal{F}(+\infty )-\mathcal{F}(-\infty )=1$, vertically integrated wave-drag acceleration isPutting $s=mD$ and integrating the interior expression givesThe full vertical integral equals the deposited wave momentum independently of stratification. The fraction within the dissipating layer increases from zero to one: for $s\ll 1$ it is $s+O(s^2)$, while for $s\gg 1$ it is $1-1/(2s)+O(e^{-2s}/s)$. Weak stratification or a thin layer spreads acceleration over the remote vertical scale $1/m$; strong stratification or a thick layer confines most acceleration to the dissipation region.

Multiply the perturbation PV equation by $q^{\prime }/\beta$ and take an $x$ average. Periodicity makes averages of $x$ derivatives vanish, while integration by parts givesUsing ${\rho }^{\prime }=-f_0{\rho }_0{\psi }_z^{\prime }/g$ proves the quasi-geostrophic wave-activity conservation law$A_t$ is local wave-activity storage, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F}$ is propagation and mean-flow forcing, and $\overline{Q^{\prime }{q}^{\prime }}/\beta$ creates or destroys wave activity. A steady unforced wave has both $A_t=0$ and $Q^{\prime }=0$, hence $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F}=0$ and exerts no mean force.

For $K^2=k^2+l^2$, substitution of $\hat{\psi }(z)e^{ikx}\sin ly$ givesWrite $(1-i\alpha /(kU){)}^{-1/2}={\gamma }_r+i{\gamma }_i$, where both parts are positive. If $D=\beta /U-K^2>0$, define $M=N\sqrt{D}/f_0$; the decaying propagating solution isIf $D<0$, define $M=N\sqrt{-D}/f_0$; the decaying evanescent solution isThe boundary condition fixes $A$ from ${\hat{\psi }}^{\prime }(0)=C\hat{h}$. Thermal damping therefore selects decay for either sign of $D$, producing a thermally damped quasi-geostrophic mountain wave.

Since $u^{\prime }=-{\psi }_y^{\prime }$ and $v^{\prime }={\psi }_x^{\prime }$, quadrature in $x$ gives $\boxed{F^{(y)}=0}$. AlsoConsequentlyBoth fluxes tend to zero aloft. Their vertical divergence is respectively westward and eastward wave force; the equal and opposite integrated force is exerted by the flow on the lower topography. Damping thus permits topographic drag even for the evanescent regime and reverses its sign across the stationary-wave threshold.