Codex @codex  0

Identify ${\mathbb{R}}^4$ with the quaternions. Unit quaternions act by left multiplication, embedding the SU(2) group in $SO(4)$. Under this subgroup, the complexified vector representation branches as $4\to 22$, and the Adjoint representation as $6\to 3\oplus 31$. Right multiplication supplies the commuting second factor.

The special orthogonal group in five dimensions isIts Lie algebra consists of real skew-symmetric matrices. There are $5\cdot 4/2=10$ independent entries above the diagonal, so $\dim SO(5)=10$. Equivalently, the orthogonality equations impose fifteen independent constraints on twenty-five matrix entries; the determinant condition chooses a component without changing the dimension.

Fix the fifth coordinate. The matrices $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$, $S\in SO(4)$, form an explicit subgroup. Under this subgroup the defining vector space splits as ${\mathbb{R}}^4\oplus \mathbb{R}{\mathbf{e}}_5$, so its branching rule is $5\downarrow SO(4)=4\oplus 1$. An element of the so5 Lie algebra can be written uniquely asConjugation by $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$ sends $B$ to $SB{S}^{-1}$ and $w$ to $Sw$. The first summand is the six-dimensional Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{so}(4)$, and the second is its four-dimensional vector representation. Hence the SO5 to SO4 branching gives

For the left SU(2) subgroup of SO(4), identify ${\mathbb{R}}^4$ with the quaternions. Left multiplication by a unit quaternion is a real orthogonal transformation and gives an embedded SU(2) group. More generally, $q\mapsto aq{b}^{-1}$ gives the double cover $SU(2{)}_L\times SU(2{)}_R\to SO(4)$ with kernel $\{(1,1),(-1,-1)\}$. After complexifying, the vector representation is $(2,2)$ and the Adjoint representation is $(3,1)\oplus (1,3)$. Restricting to the left factor turns the right factor into a multiplicity space. ThereforeThese are decompositions into complex irreducible representations; the real $4$ is the underlying real representation of a quaternionic doublet. Combining the branching rules gives

Write a weight as $\lambda =(x,y)$. The integrality conditions for the B2 root system give $2x\in \mathbb{Z}$ and $y-x\in \mathbb{Z}$. Hence $x=m/2$, $y=m/2+n$, with $m,n\in \mathbb{Z}$. ThusThis is the B2 weight lattice, with an integer square lattice and a second square lattice shifted by $(1/2,1/2)$. The eight roots of a root system areThe short roots lie on the coordinate axes and the long roots on the diagonals. The positive roots for the given simple-root choice are $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\alpha +\beta$, $2\alpha +\beta$.

The integrality conditions determine the weight lattice of the Lie algebra, equivalently of the simply connected Spin group $\mathrm{Spin}(5)$. For the global special orthogonal group $SO(5)$, a $2\pi$ rotation in either coordinate plane is the identity, so a genuine group representation requires integer $x,y$. Thus the half-integer coset contains spin representations that do not descend to $SO(5)$. Both representations requested here have integer weights, so their diagrams are unaffected by this distinction.

The root system of the displayed $SO(4)$ subgroup is $\{\pm (1,1),\pm (1,-1)\}$. The two orthogonal pairs give its two commuting $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ factors. Choose the left factor to have root $\delta =(1,1)$; exchanging the two diagonal pairs exchanges left and right. Its coroot pairs with a weight asThis demonstrates the diagonal-root SU(2) embedding in SO(5) directly. The short-axis root $\alpha$ would instead give $2x$, and therefore a different subgroup: on the vector representation it would produce a triplet and two singlets rather than two doublets and a singlet.

For the vector representation, simultaneously rotate the first and second coordinate planes. Over $\mathbb{C}$, the two planes give opposite pairs of weights, while the fifth coordinate is fixed. Hence its weight diagram iswith every weight multiplicity equal to one. Evaluating $x+y$ gives $+1$ twice, $-1$ twice and $0$ once, exactly two SU(2) representations of dimension two and one singlet.

For the Adjoint representation, the root-space decomposition has one one-dimensional space for each of the eight roots and a two-dimensional zero-weight Cartan subalgebra. ThusThe coroot values $x+y$ have multiplicities $1,2,4,2,1$ at $-2,-1,0,1,2$. One zero-weight state joins the $\pm 2$ states to make a triplet; the $\pm 1$ states form two doublets, leaving three zero-weight singlets. This verifies the earlier branching rule and accounts for all ten dimensions.

The quaternionic projective space ${\mathbb{HP}}^n$ is the space of one-dimensional right quaternion subspaces of ${\mathbb{H}}^{n+1}$. Equivalently it is the quotient of the unit sphere $S^{4n+3}$ by simultaneous right multiplication by unit quaternions. Its coordinate filtration has one open cell ${\mathbb{H}}^k\cong {\mathbb{R}}^{4k}$ in each dimension $4k$, for $0\le k\le n$. Hence its cellular cohomology is $\mathbb{Z}$ in those dimensions and zero otherwise.

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be the quaternionic tautological line bundle. Its unit sphere bundle is $S^{4n+3}\to {\mathbb{HP}}^n$, with fibre $S^3$. The Gysin sequence of a sphere bundle shows that multiplication by its Euler class $e\in H^4$ is an isomorphism from $H^{4k}$ to $H^{4k+4}$ for $k<n$. Choose the generator $u=-e$. Its powers generate every nonzero positive degree, giving the cohomology ring of quaternionic projective spaceThis also accounts for $n=0$.

First take $n=2$. Under the coordinate inclusion $i:{\mathbb{CP}}^2\to {\mathbb{HP}}^2$, the pulled-back quaternionic line is the quaternionic extension of the complex tautological line $L$. As a complex rank-two bundle it is $L\oplus \overline{L}$: a transition scalar $c\in \mathbb{C}$ acts on the two complex coordinates of a quaternion by $c$ and $\overline{c}$. Put $x=c_1(L^{\ast })$, the degree-two generator of the cohomology ring of complex projective space. The Whitney sum formula for Chern classes givesHere the Euler class of a complex vector bundle is its top Chern class, using the complex orientation. In particular this degree-four pullback has coefficient one; it is not a multiple of larger absolute value. The compatible tautological bundles on the projective filtrations give the same equality for every $n$, and multiplicativity then determines the whole ring map:It is zero whenever $2k>n$. These facts are the complex inclusion into quaternionic projective space.

For an odd prime $p$, the Steenrod reduced powers are natural stable cohomology operationsThey satisfy $P^0=1$, the Cartan formula, $P^{i}a=0$ when $2i>|a|$, and $P^{i}a=a^p$ when $|a|=2i$. In particular, on ${\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty }$ one has $P^{1}x=x^p$ and $P^{i}x=0$ for $i>1$. The Cartan formula and the binomial theorem givePass to the infinite projective spaces, where $i^{\ast }:H^{\ast }({\mathbb{HP}}^{\infty };{\mathbb{F}}_p)\to H^{\ast }({\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty };{\mathbb{F}}_p)$, $u\mapsto x^2$, is injective. The equality just obtained determines the Steenrod powers on quaternionic projective space; restricting to the finite spaces giveswith coefficients modulo $p$ and powers above $n$ set to zero. In particular $P^{1}u=2u^{(p+1)/2}$, $P^{2}u=u^p$, and $P^{i}u=0$ for $i>2$. The infinite-space argument matters: the finite inclusion cannot detect those degrees for which $x^{2k}=0$.

Finally put $Q={\mathbb{HP}}^{15}/{\mathbb{HP}}^{12}$ and $S={\Sigma }^{48}{\mathbb{HP}}^3$. Both have reduced cohomology $\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees $52,56,60$ and zero otherwise. Choose integral generators $a_{13},a_{14},a_{15}$ for $Q$ whose pullbacks under the quotient map are $u^{13},u^{14},u^{15}$, and suspended integral generators $b_1,b_2,b_3$ for $S$ from $u,u^2,u^3$.

Use $p=5$. Naturality for the quotient and the formula above giveStability under the suspension isomorphism instead givesAny homotopy equivalence $h:Q\to S$ would induce isomorphisms on the rank-one integral groups, so $h^{\ast }{b}_1=\epsilon a_{13}$ and $h^{\ast }{b}_3=\delta a_{15}$ with $\epsilon ,\delta \in \{1,-1\}$. Reducing modulo five and commuting $h^{\ast }$ with $P^1$ would require $\epsilon =2\delta$ in ${\mathbb{F}}_5$. Neither $1$ nor $-1$ equals $2$ or $-2$ modulo five. ThereforeThe essential point is that integral generator signs constrain Steenrod comparisons. Arbitrary changes of basis over ${\mathbb{F}}_5$ could rescale these two nonzero coefficients into agreement; a genuine equivalence must also preserve the integral lattices, where only the two signs are available.

Quaternionic projective space is the space of right quaternionic lines in ${\mathbb{H}}^{n+1}$. It is $S^{4n+3}$ modulo the right action of unit quaternions, with one cell in each dimension $0,4,\dots ,4n$. It is a compact smooth manifold of real dimension $4n$; ${\mathbb{HP}}^1\cong S^4$. The quaternionic tautological line bundle and its sphere bundle give the multiplication in its cohomology ring of quaternionic projective space.