Rayleigh damping approximates the damping matrix of a linear structural dynamics model by a combination of its mass matrix and stiffness matrix:Here has units and has units . This is a convenient form of proportional damping: for constant symmetric and positive definite, the same normal modes that separate the undamped system also separate this damping matrix. The OpenSees implementation additionally permits coefficients multiplying current, initial and last-committed stiffness matrices; these are distinct choices in a nonlinear calculation.[ref]
To see the modal consequence, take an undamped normal mode and its modal mass . ThenThus Rayleigh damping specifies a frequency-dependent damping ratio, rather than the same damping ratio for every normal mode. The mass-proportional term dominates at low nonzero angular frequency, and the stiffness-proportional term dominates at high angular frequency.
For example, fitting a damping ratio of at both and givesThe resulting damping ratio is at and at . Agreement at two fitted frequencies therefore does not validate damping outside that band. In particular, a zero-frequency rigid motion has no modal damping ratio of this form, yet the term can still resist that motion.
For nonnegative and positive semidefinite , the dissipated power is nonnegative. This supplies an immediate physical check on a fit. It does not establish that the chosen damping matrix represents a particular material or joint: an apparatus would need measured modal decay or another measured dissipative response to justify its coefficients. OpenSees specifically cautions that Rayleigh damping can give incorrect results in nonlinear time-history analysis with concentrated plasticity.[ref]
Rayleigh Damping Command in OpenSees Documentation. §3.1.13.1, Note, warning about concentrated-plasticity nonlinear models
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.