Electron-acoustic recoil length Created 2026-10-25 Updated 2026-11-05
For free-electron recoil and a linear acoustic branch, and . Their ratio is , so equality occurs at . This is a momentum/localization crossover scale, formally half a sound-speed analogue of the Reduced Compton wavelength. It does not replace the speed of light in electron relativity or determine a mean free path. A Fermi-surface electron emitting a phonon has fractional radial loss when the transferred energy is small.
The electron-acoustic recoil length compares electronic recoil with the acoustic quantum energy associated with the same momentum. For transferred wave number ,
The dispersions cross at ; there the reduced electron de Broglie wavelength is and its free-particle group velocity is . Thus is the length scale at which an electron's localization/recoil energy and a corresponding acoustic excitation energy become comparable. At the electron recoil energy is large compared with the phonon energy; this explains the separation of electronic and acoustic energy scales when lattice wave numbers exceed .
Formally it is half the Reduced Compton wavelength with the speed of light replaced by the speed of sound. That is an analogy of scales, not a relativistic electron mass or a pair-production threshold: sound does not replace the limiting speed in electron dynamics. Also it is a reduced-wavelength convention; an ordinary de Broglie wavelength at the crossing is . No scattering lifetime appears, so is not an electron mean free path.
Figure 1.
Electron–acoustic recoil crossover and nearly conserved Fermi-wavevector magnitude
. Original dimensionless dispersion comparison with on the horizontal axis. The separate right panel compares the exact radial loss to its small-transfer approximation ; the cutoff-phonon example is marked at . Neither panel is a measured copper dispersion curve. Details.
The static one-pion exchange propagator gives a Yukawa potential proportional to . Its characteristic range is therefore the Reduced Compton wavelength,
This is an exponential falloff scale, not a sharp interaction cutoff. The ordinary Compton wavelength would introduce an unwanted factor .