His 1947 sweep investigation provides a concrete earlier example. A wing was tested with zero, forward and backward sweep in the Langley 8-foot high-speed wind tunnel. Pressure measurements and wake surveys supplied loading and drag information, showing that changes associated with shocks were delayed by sweep without following a universal cosine shift exactly.[ref]
For the area rule, the scientific question was whether the streamwise area distribution of the complete wing-body combination mattered more than judging each component separately. NASA describes testing his proposed distribution with a specially built wing-body model, then applying the result to a fighter configuration.[ref]
An original bookkeeping example illustrates the geometric idea without predicting wave drag. If a body contributes of cross-sectional area at one station and the added wing contributes another to the stipulated combined section, their sum is . Reducing the body's contribution to restores a total there. The relevant research concerns how that total varies along the vehicle; this one-station sum is not a drag law.
His later supercritical airfoil and winglet contributions addressed different flow mechanisms. NASA describes a shaped high-subsonic section and carefully tailored wing-tip devices, rather than treating every drag reduction as the same geometric correction.[ref] The common experimental method is to specify the geometry, identify the predicted flow change and measure the resulting aerodynamic response.

Tagged

Articles by others on the same topic (1)

Richard T. Whitcomb was an influential American aeronautical engineer and inventor, best known for his pioneering work in the field of aerodynamics. He is particularly recognized for his contributions to the development of the "supercritical airfoil," which helped to improve the performance of aircraft flying at transonic speeds (around the speed of sound). This innovation contributed to increased efficiency and performance in commercial and military aviation.