Write for the maximum cardinality of a subset of containing no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. There is an absolute constant such that every three-term-progression-free subset satisfies for . A quantitative Roth density-increment step gives, for subset density and , a arithmetic progression of length at least and increased subset density at least . The increment decreases reciprocal subset density by at least , so fewer than iterations are possible. If is the successive length, then , using the initial subset density to bound all later ones. Hence . If exceeds a sufficiently large absolute constant, all these intervals remain above the density increment threshold, a contradiction. This proves the displayed bound. The result is a classical quantitative version of Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions, without asserting an optimal bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions says that, for each fixed , a sufficiently long interval cannot have a subset of density of a finite subset at least with no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Equivalently, the maximum size of a three-term-progression-free subset of is . Here is a density increment proof, including its analytic ingredients.
Write and embed into the cyclic group of order . For normalized Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group take . The orthogonality of complex exponentials follows from a finite geometric series: its average is zero for a nonzero frequency and one for frequency zero. Expanding in these linear phases consequently proves both Fourier inversion on a finite group and the Parseval identity on a finite group. In particular,The second identity follows by summing the frequency expansion over : the two constraints leave precisely the frequencies . Since is odd, multiplication by two permutes the frequencies. Also a congruence with is an equality in the integers, since .
Let have subset density , and suppose it contains no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. Its balanced indicator function of a finite subset is , extended by zero outside . Then . Counting endpoints with the same parity givesIf , their difference in absolute value is at least . Telescope the difference of the products into three terms, each containing and two factors chosen from . Put . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity on a finite group bound each term by , since the squared normalized norm of either other factor is at most . Therefore some nonzero frequency satisfiesThis is the Fourier detection of a progression-free subset of an interval step; it has just been proved rather than assumed.
We now turn this Fourier coefficient on a finite abelian group into a density increment. Set . Partition the unit interval into equal pieces and place the fractional parts of in them. The pigeonhole principle gives with . This proves the particular Dirichlet approximation theorem needed here. Put and . For sufficiently large depending only on , and . Each residue chain modulo in has at least elements. Split each such chain into arithmetic progressions with between and elements, absorbing its final short remainder into the previous block.
The linear phase changes by at most within any block. Freezing the linear phase at the first element of each block therefore changes the preceding correlation by at most , because . The triangle inequality givesThe block sums of the balanced indicator function of a finite subset add to zero, so their positive total is half their absolute total. Some block consequently satisfiesHere is absolute, and shrinking it absorbs the floors. An affine parametrization of identifies with a subset of and preserves arithmetic progressions.
Repeat this Roth density-increment step. Every step raises the subset density by at least , so fewer than steps are possible. All the lengths satisfy while above a threshold depending only on . Choose the initial so large that this lower recursion stays above that threshold for steps; this is possible by working backwards through finitely many squarings. We would then force a subset density greater than one. Thus every fixed positive density eventually forces a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. For an infinite subset of the positive integers with positive upper asymptotic density, apply the finite conclusion along initial intervals whose subset density is bounded away from zero; this gives the usual infinite formulation as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 129 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the usual convention that a three-term arithmetic progression must be nonconstant. There is a genuine small-case defect in the printed statement: for , , and , neither conclusion can hold with . We prove the intended Roth density-increment step for every odd integer , including the small values of , rather than silently treating as covered. Counting constant arithmetic progressions would make the first alternative vacuous for every nonempty .
Suppose that has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, and let be its actual density of a finite subset. Thus . Put , , and embed in the cyclic group . A congruence with is an equality over the integers, since . Thus this embedding creates no extra three-term arithmetic progressions. Since is odd, multiplication by two permutes .
Use normalized Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group, with and . For the normalized trilinear arithmetic progression count, character orthogonality givesIndeed, expanding each function in its inverse Fourier transform, averaging in forces , and averaging in then forces . The Parseval identity in this normalization is .
Let , , and , the balanced indicator function of a finite subset. Then . Only constant arithmetic progressions contribute to , whereas summing over centers counts ordered three-term arithmetic progressions in . HenceSet . Telescope by changing one factor at a time:In the Fourier transform formula for each term, bound the Fourier coefficient of by and apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the other two factors. The permutation preserves the required squared sums. Since and , this givesIf , then , so the difference in the other direction is at least . Consequently Fourier detection of a progression-free subset of an interval gives a nonzero frequency with
To turn this into a density increment, take . The Dirichlet approximation theorem, proved here by placing into equal intervals modulo one, gives such that . DefineFor , the inequalities and show thatUse a progression partition with nearly constant linear phase: every residue chain of modulo has at least points. Split each chain into blocks of consecutive chain points, merging any remainder into its last full block. This partitions into arithmetic progressions with and common difference .
On a block with first point , the linear phase satisfiesLet . Freezing the linear phase on each block introduces error at most . ThereforeThe block sums total zero. Their positive part consequently totals at least . Since all block lengths total , some block has . Its density of a finite subset is at least .
For the remaining , divide into disjoint consecutive triples and a remainder of at most two points. A three-term-arithmetic progression-free uses at most two points of each triple, so ; the largest ratio occurs at . Any singleton set from then has density of a finite subset one, which is at least . We may therefore use the explicit constantsIn the large case the constructed arithmetic progression has length at least ; in the small case its length one does too. Thus these constants prove the intended result for all odd integers .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 147 2 Solution 2026-10-03
Let and let be the balanced indicator function, extended by zero to the integers. For finitely supported functions define the linear configuration countSince has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, . On the other hand, . Hence, once is sufficiently large in terms of ,for an absolute .
Use the unnormalized Fourier transform on . Telescoping writes the preceding difference asLet . The Fourier-integral formula for , followed by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity, bounds these three terms respectively byThey are all at most , sofor an absolute . Choose with .
By the Dirichlet approximation theorem, some integer satisfies . Choose a sufficiently small absolute multiple of . Partition each residue-class progression of common difference into progressions whose lengths lie between and ; for sufficiently large , short final pieces can be joined to the preceding piece. On each , the linear phase varies by at most . Choosing small enough compared with therefore yieldsThe sums over all cells add to , so their positive parts total half their absolute values. At least one consequently satisfiesThis is the Roth density-increment step, and it giveswith and depending only on .
For every , every sufficiently long integer interval has a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression in each subset of subset density at least . This is a theorem about additive combinatorics, distinct from the Roth theorem on approximation of algebraic irrational numbers. The Roth density-increment step proves it by repeatedly increasing subset density on a shorter arithmetic progression.