Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions

For every $\delta >0$, every sufficiently long integer interval has a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression in each subset of subset density at least $\delta$. This is a theorem about additive combinatorics, distinct from the Roth theorem on approximation of algebraic irrational numbers. The Roth density-increment step proves it by repeatedly increasing subset density on a shorter arithmetic progression.

If a density-$\delta$ subset of a sufficiently long integer interval has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, Fourier expansion of the progression count gives a large coefficient of its balanced indicator. Dirichlet approximation supplies a step at most $\sqrt{N}$ on which that character varies slowly. Partitioning the interval into equal-length progressions of that step, and controlling the short tails, produces the displayed density increment. Iteration must terminate since density cannot exceed one. The same argument treats the three-point pattern with coefficients $2,-3,1$.

Embed $A\subseteq [N]$ in the odd cyclic group $G=\mathbb{Z}/(2N+1)\mathbb{Z}$, so additive three-term relations in $A$ cannot wrap around. Form three copies of $G$, putting edges $x\sim y$ when $y-x\in A$, $y\sim z$ when $z-y\in A$, and $x\sim z$ when $(z-x)/2\in A$. A triangle in a graph encodes $a+b=2c$ in $A$. If $A$ has no nonconstant arithmetic progression, every triangle in a graph has $a=b=c$; there are exactly $|G||A|$ triangles in a graph, and they are edge-disjoint. Thus at least $|G||A|$ edges must be removed to eliminate them. For fixed positive subset density of $A$, this is a positive fraction of the squared vertex count, whereas the triangle in a graph count is only quadratic. The triangle removal lemma permits deletion of an arbitrarily small quadratic fraction when the cubic triangle in a graph subset density is sufficiently small. This contradiction establishes Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions.

Write $r_3(N)$ for the maximum cardinality of a subset of $[N]$ containing no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. There is an absolute constant $C$ such that every three-term-progression-free subset $A\subseteq [N]$ satisfies $|A|\le CN/\log \log N$ for $N\ge 3$. A quantitative Roth density-increment step gives, for subset density $\delta$ and $N\ge 4\cdot 10^6{\delta }^{-4}$, a arithmetic progression of length at least ${\delta }^2\sqrt{N}/2000$ and increased subset density at least $\delta +{\delta }^2/64$. The increment decreases reciprocal subset density by at least $1/65$, so fewer than $\lceil 65/\delta \rceil$ iterations are possible. If $N_j$ is the successive length, then $\log N_{j+1}\ge \frac{1}{2}\log N_j-\log (2000/{\delta }^2)$, using the initial subset density to bound all later ones. Hence $\log N_j\ge 2^{-j}\log N-2\log (2000/{\delta }^2)$. If $\delta \log \log N$ exceeds a sufficiently large absolute constant, all these intervals remain above the density increment threshold, a contradiction. This proves the displayed bound. The result is a classical quantitative version of Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions, without asserting an optimal bound.

For fixed $\theta >0$, a sufficiently large finite set of integers with additive energy at least $\theta |A{|}^3$ has a nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression. The Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem and Ruzsa modelling lemma reduce the problem to the Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions in a dense cyclic model.