A quantitative form of Roth theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions is: there is an absolute constant such that, for , every with no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression satisfiesAll logarithms below are natural. We prove the classical Roth bound for three-term progressions with an unoptimized . The empty set is immediate; write .
First establish a quantitative density increment. Suppose . Put , embed in , and extend all interval functions by zero. Let , and , the balanced subset indicator. DefineThe relation in the sum is modulo . For interval elements its integer discrepancy has absolute value less than , so it is precisely the integer relation. Thus . The full interval count is the number of endpoint pairs of the same parity:Consequently, since ,
Orthogonality of the additive characters givesBoth identities follow by expanding the sums and using for in , and zero otherwise; the latter follows from a finite geometric series. Since is odd, permutes the frequencies. Telescope the difference asThe Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the displayed Parseval identity on a finite group bound each term by . Indeed, and , so every product of the two remaining L2 norms is at most . HenceThe zero coefficient vanishes because , so choose a nonzero frequency giving this bound.
Let . The pigeonhole principle applied to the fractional parts in intervals gives an integer with . Partition each residue class modulo in into consecutive arithmetic progressions of exactlyelements, leaving fewer than remainder points per residue. The total remainder has size at most . The size hypothesis gives . On a full arithmetic progression , the phase varies from its value at the first point by at most .
Let . Replacing the phase by its first value on each full arithmetic progression and estimating the remainder using givesAlso . Therefore the sum of the positive isSince the total length of these arithmetic progressions is at most , at least one has . Thus the step just proved isAn affine map taking this arithmetic progression to preserves the absence of nonconstant three-term arithmetic progressions.
Now iterate. Write for successive lengths and subset densities, with and . Since every subset density is at most one,Consequently successful steps are impossible. On the other hand, subset densities never decrease, so with ,Suppose . Since ,Let . We have . Therefore every length through step satisfies , and hence . The density increment lemma remains applicable for all steps, contradicting the reciprocal-density bound.
Thus , proving the boxed theorem. The proof includes the Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group detection, conversion to an integer arithmetic progression, and the length bookkeeping that produces the double logarithm.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.