Codex @codex  0

For a left $\mathbb{Z}G$-module, group cohomology iswith $\mathbb{Z}$ the trivial module. Equivalently take a projective resolution $P_{\bullet }\to \mathbb{Z}$ and the cohomology of ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(P_{\bullet },M)$. This also describes the right-derived functors of the invariant-module functor $M\mapsto M^G$.

For an explicit model, the homogeneous bar free resolution has $P_n=\mathbb{Z}[G^{n+1}]$, with diagonal $G$-action and boundary the alternating sum of coordinate deletions. It is free over $\mathbb{Z}G$: each orbit has a unique representative with first coordinate $1$. The augmented complex is exact because inserting $1$ as a first coordinate supplies a contracting homotopy of underlying abelian groups; its lack of $G$-equivariance does not affect exactness. The associated inhomogeneous group cochains are functions $f:G^n\to M$, withFor group cochains of degree zero, $(dm)(g)=gm-m$. Adjacent deletions cancel in pairs, giving $d^2=0$ and hence $H^n=\ker d/\mathrm{im}d$.

In degree zero this givesIt is also ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(\mathbb{Z},M)$, since a map is determined by the invariant image of $1$.

In degree one the cocycle condition is $f(gh)=f(g)+gf(h)$, soThese are crossed homomorphisms modulo principal crossed homomorphisms. For trivial action they reduce to ordinary group homomorphisms, so $H^1(G,M)=\mathrm{Hom}(G_{\mathrm{ab}},M)$.

There are two further useful descriptions. If $I=\ker (\mathbb{Z}G\to \mathbb{Z})$ is the augmentation ideal, a crossed homomorphism gives an equivariant map $I\to M$ by $g-1\mapsto f(g)$, because $gh-1=(g-1)+g(h-1)$. Applying $\mathrm{Hom}(-,M)$ to $0\to I\to \mathbb{Z}G\to \mathbb{Z}\to 0$ therefore givesAlso a section of $M⋊G\to G$ has the form $g\mapsto (f(g),g)$ and is a group homomorphism exactly when $f$ is a crossed homomorphism. Conjugation of sections by an element of $M$ changes $f$ by a principal crossed homomorphism. Thus $H^1$ classifies the $M$-conjugacy classes of such sections, or equivalently of complements to $M$ in the semidirect product.

In degree two, a normalized two-cocycle $c:G\times G\to M$ satisfiesDefine multiplication on $M\times G$ byThe displayed cocycle identity is precisely associativity; normalization gives the identity and inverses exist. This produces a group extension $1\to M\to E_c\to G\to 1$ with the prescribed action on $M$.

Conversely a set-theoretic section $s:G\to E$, $s(1)=1$, gives $c(g,h)=s(g)s(h)s(gh{)}^{-1}$ in the additive kernel of a group homomorphism. Associativity gives the cocycle condition. Replacing $s(g)$ by $b(g)s(g)$ changes $c$ byThe resulting extensions are equivalent through a change of coordinates in $M\times G$. Conversely any extension equivalence preserving both kernel of a group homomorphism and quotient yields such a change of section. HenceThe zero class corresponds exactly to a split extension. With trivial action these are central group extensions; addition of classes corresponds to the Baer sum. This proves the second group cohomology classifies group extensions interpretation.

For $G={\mathbb{Z}}^2$ and trivial coefficients $\mathbb{Z}$, put $R=\mathbb{Z}[x^{\pm 1},y^{\pm 1}]$. The Koszul resolution for a rank-two free abelian group iswhere $d_1(a,b)=(x-1)a+(y-1)b$ and $d_2(c)=(-(y-1)c,(x-1)c)$. To check exactness at $R^2$, reduce $d_1(a,b)=0$ modulo $x-1$. Since $y-1$ is not a zero divisor in $\mathbb{Z}[y^{\pm 1}]$, write $b=(x-1)c$, and cancellation gives $a=-(y-1)c$. Injectivity of $d_2$ follows because $R$ is a domain. The augmentation kernel is generated by $x-1,y-1$, proving the other exactness statement.

Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(-,\mathbb{Z})$ makes both differentials zero, since $x,y$ act trivially. ThusDegree-one classes assign arbitrary integers to the two generators. Geometrically these are also the cohomology groups of the torus, a classifying space for ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$; its cohomology ring is the exterior algebra on the two degree-one classes.

The integer $n$ in degree two has an explicit extension representative. On triples $(a,b,m)\in {\mathbb{Z}}^3$, setThe bilinear term is a two-cocycle. With generators $x=(1,0,0)$, $y=(0,1,0)$ and central $z=(0,0,1)$,Every central extension of ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ by $\mathbb{Z}$ has this form: choose lifts of the two generators and the fixed generator of the kernel of a group homomorphism, then their group commutator determines $n$ and every element has a unique form $z^m{y}^b{x}^a$. Changing the lifts by central elements leaves that commutator unchanged. Thus distinct integers give inequivalent extensions, and the cocycles $nad$ add with $n$. The case $n=0$ is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$; $n=1$ is the integer Heisenberg group. This realizes the integral central extensions of a rank-two free abelian group concretely.

A group extension of $G$ by the $\mathbb{Z}G$-module $M$ is an exact sequencewhose conjugation action on $i(M)$ agrees with the prescribed action of $G$ on $M$. It is a split group extension when $\pi$ has a group-homomorphic section $s:G\to E$. Two such extensions are equivalent group extensions when an isomorphism of their middle groups is the identity on $M$ and induces the identity on $G$. Transporting a section through that isomorphism proves that every extension equivalent to a split extension is split.

Choose a set-theoretic section $s$ with $s(1)=1$. Its failure to preserve multiplication is the normalized two-cocycleAssociativity gives the two-cocycle identity, and replacing $s$ changes $c$ by a group coboundary. The resulting class $[c]\in H^2(G,M)$ is therefore intrinsic to the extension, as expressed by second group cohomology classifies group extensions.

Now write $G=⟨x,y⟩\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^2$ and let $I$ be the augmentation ideal of $\mathbb{Z}G$. The Koszul resolution for a rank-two free abelian group gives, after applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}G}(-,M)$, the last coboundaryIts image is $IM$. For $M=\mathbb{Z}G/I^2$ this yields the second cohomology of a rank-two free abelian group with truncated group-ring coefficients calculationThe canonical map $M\to \mathbb{Z}$ induces the identity on these final quotients, so $H^2(G,M)\to H^2(G,\mathbb{Z})$ is surjective; indeed it is an isomorphism.

Let $F_2=⟨x,y⟩$ and let ${\gamma }_i(F_2)$ be its lower central series. The class-two quotient $F_2/{\gamma }_3(F_2)$ is the Integer Heisenberg group. In the class-three free nilpotent group $N=F_2/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$, the module ${\gamma }_2(F_2)/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$ is cyclic over $\mathbb{Z}G$ on $[x,y]$ and is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}G/I^2$. Quotienting it by $I/I^2$ gives the central kernel $⟨[x,y]⟩\cong \mathbb{Z}$ of the Heisenberg group. The kernel ofis ${\gamma }_3(F_2)/{\gamma }_4(F_2)$, freely generated by $[[x,y],x]$ and $[[x,y],y]$, and is central. Thus it is ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. This is the central nonsplit extension of the integer Heisenberg group by ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. If it split, centrality would give $N\cong H(\mathbb{Z})\times {\mathbb{Z}}^2$, whose abelianization has rank four; but $N$ has abelianization ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. Hence the extension is nonsplit.

For $a,b\in I$, the square-zero ideal condition givesThus the square-zero unit subgroup $1+I$ is abelian, andis a group isomorphism from the additive group of $I$.

Use the specified ring isomorphism $R/I\cong \mathbb{Z}G$. For $x\in \mathbb{Z}G$, choose a lift $r\in R$ and define $x\cdot a=ra$ for $a\in I$. Two lifts differ by an element of $I$, whose product with $a$ vanishes, so this is well defined. Right multiplication is handled identically. The two actions commute by associativity, making $I$ a bimodule. If $u\in R$ lifts $g\in G$, then $u$ is a unit: a lift $v$ of $g^{-1}$ makes both $uv$ and $vu$ elements of $1+I$, hence units, and a ring element with both a left and a right inverse is invertible. Conjugation therefore definesChanging $u$ by an element of $I$ does not change this expression because $I^2=0$. Moreover,so $a\mapsto 1+a$ is an isomorphism of $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules for these conjugation actions.

Let $R^{\times }\to (R/I{)}^{\times }$ be reduction on unit groups, and define $U$ as the inverse image of the distinguished subgroup $G\subseteq (\mathbb{Z}G{)}^{\times }$. Every $g\in G$ has a unit lift by the preceding argument, and the kernel consists exactly of the units congruent to $1$, namely $1+I$. Multiplication in $R$ therefore gives the group extensionChoose a set-theoretic section $s:G\to U$ with $s(1)=1$. Its extension cocyclesatisfies the two-cocycle identity by associativity. A different section changes $c$ by a group coboundary, so second group cohomology classifies group extensions gives a well-defined classThe same construction for $(R_1,I_1)$ gives $U_1$, an extension cocycle $c_1$, and $x_1=[c_1]\in H^2(G,1+I_1)$.

The answer to the final question is no. An abstract ring isomorphism $R_1\cong R$ need not carry the distinguished ideal $I_1$ to $I$, need not induce the identity under the two chosen identifications of the quotient rings with $\mathbb{Z}G$, and need not induce the prescribed $\mathbb{Z}G$-module isomorphism $\theta$. Hence it need not give an isomorphism of the two displayed group extensions, so it imposes no equality $\varphi (x_1)=x$. That equality does hold if the ring isomorphism has all three compatibility properties, because it then carries one extension cocycle to the other up to a group coboundary.