The telescope forms the sky image at the entrance slit. A collimator makes the transmitted beam parallel, a reflection diffraction grating disperses it, and a camera’s optical lens focuses each wavelength to a different detector position.
/past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/iii/paper-338-spectrograph.png
With a uniformly illuminated slit, ideal imaging and negligible slit diffraction, each monochromatic slit image has an approximately top-hat intensity profile of physical width . A small wavelength separation displaces two such images by , using the positive magnitude of grating dispersion. In the geometrical, slit-limited convention, resolution occurs when the displacement is of order the slit-image width. Hence
Here is the slit’s apparent wavelength extent. A finite diffraction grating broadens the sharp edges; the top-hat sketch and the following identities presume slit-limited resolving power of a grating, rather than the regime where the grating’s own diffraction determines the line width. A precise resolution criterion for nonideal profiles can change order-unity factors.
In the simple slit-image approximation, the projected slit width is . Equating this width to the separation of barely resolved features, using the grating dispersion, gives
This recovers the stated spectral resolving power under the assumption that the grating has unit anamorphic magnification.
For arbitrary distinct and , the anamorphic magnification of a grating must be included. At fixed wavelength, the grating equation gives , so the slit image instead has width . Thus the general slit-limited resolving power of a grating is
The two expressions agree in the Littrow configuration, . Without that condition or the unit-magnification approximation, the quoted expression is not the general slit-limited result. Finite grating size, detector sampling, and optical aberrations can lower the actual resolution further.