Fix the Bernstein filtration on the Weyl algebra. Two good filtrations of a module are bounded shifts of one another: and conversely. If an operator of degree has symbol annihilating , its th power lowers the expected filtration degree by . For , comparison of filtrations forces the same power of its symbol to annihilate . Reversing the roles gives equality of the radical annihilator ideals and hence equality of support of a module. The algebra filtration is held fixed; changing between order and Bernstein filtrations need not preserve the same variety.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 2 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose a basis of the Lie algebra and filter its universal enveloping algebra by word length: and is spanned by products of at most basis elements. The relations replace a degree-two commutator by degree one, so the degree-one symbols commute.
The Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem says the ordered monomials are a basis. Its relevant proof can be seen by reordering an inverted neighboring pair using the displayed relation. Reordering terminates because same-length terms have fewer inversions and bracket terms have smaller word length. Disjoint swaps commute; the only overlapping three-letter reorderings differ by . The Jacobi identity therefore makes the reduced ordered expression independent of the reordering path. Ordered monomials have no remaining relations and form the basis. Their degree- symbols giveFor generators of the finitely generated module , put . This is a good filtration, and is finite over the three-variable polynomial ring. Define the dimension of a filtered module as the Krull dimension of its associated graded module, equivalently the degree of the eventual cumulative polynomial , or the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module. Two good filtrations have bounded shifts, so the growth degree is independent of the generators. Sinceits polynomial degree is at most three. Therefore every nonzero finitely generated -module has dimension at most . The zero module may be assigned the usual separate empty-support convention. This bound also follows immediately from its support of a module inside affine three-space.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 101 2 iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Take , , and . The group is nonzero and divisible. Since every element of has finite order, is the filtered union of finite cyclic groups. For every ,Tensor products commute with filtered colimits, so
Now suppose a nonzero finitely generated -module satisfied . Choose a maximal ideal in the support of . The localized module is nonzero and finitely generated. By Nakayama lemma,This is a nonzero vector space over the residue field , so its -fold tensor power is nonzero. But it is the reduction modulo of , a contradiction. Thus a nonzero tensor-nilpotent module cannot be finitely generated.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 126 1 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a ring homomorphism , the module of Kähler differentials is the -module generated by symbols , subject toEquivalently, it represents -linear derivations:For , the Transitivity exact sequence for Kähler differentials isIf is surjective, the Conormal exact sequence for Kähler differentials is
Let be a finite field extension. By the primitive element theorem, its maximal separable field extension is simple, and transitivity reduces the calculation to a simple algebraic extension. If with minimal polynomial , thenThus a separable simple extension has zero differentials. Conversely, if is not separable, the purely inseparable part has a generator whose minimal polynomial has zero formal derivative in positive characteristic, producing a nonzero differential. Hence
Now let . If , , and , then the minimal polynomial is and has zero derivative, soIf , where , , and , then . Both defining equations have zero derivative, and
- In (i), and relative to , so
- In (ii), and vanish relatively, whence