For order , the Sylow theorems give and , hence or . If , the Sylow subgroup of order is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup. If were simple in the other case, it would be nonabelian (a finite abelian simple group has prime order), and the preceding result would force , impossible. Thus every group of order 48 is not simple.
An example with no normal Sylow subgroup for is
In , is a dihedral group of order : conjugation by inverts . Thus has order and is a Sylow subgroup of . The only transpositions in are and ; conjugating by gives . Therefore and are not normal. By conjugacy, no other Sylow subgroup for is normal either.
Write with . The Sylow theorems state:
Let with primes and nonabelian. The Sylow theorems give and , so and the Sylow -subgroup is normal. Also and . If , both Sylow subgroups are normal and is their abelian direct product, a contradiction. Hence , and
Because is abelian, the commutator subgroup lies in . It is nontrivial because is nonabelian, and is prime, so . Therefore
and has exactly linear characters.
Every nonlinear irreducible degree divides . Its square is at most , so the only possibility is degree . If there are such characters, the sum of squares of irreducible degrees gives
The number of irreducible characters equals the number of conjugacy classes, so
These are the irreducible characters of a nonabelian group of order p q.
The Sylow theorems state that if with , then:
Interchange the two primes if necessary so that . By the Sylow theorems, the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies
If , then is or . The first is impossible because . The second would imply
Since is prime, it cannot divide , so it must divide . But then forces , impossible because and are both odd. Therefore . The unique Sylow -subgroup is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup, and hence
Take . Since is a normal subgroup, ; it has the same order as , so it is also a Sylow subgroup of . The conjugacy assertion in the Sylow theorems supplies such that
Consequently , and therefore
Thus , while the reverse inclusion is immediate because both factors are subgroups of . Hence
For subgroups , define when . The identity elements show reflexivity, inverses show symmetry, and multiplication shows transitivity. Thus the double cosets partition .
Let act by left multiplication on the set of left cosets . The orbit of consists of the cosets contained in , so its size is . Its stabilizer is
The orbit-stabilizer theorem therefore gives
Suppose is a Sylow subgroup of , with , and write the largest power of dividing as . If every had order at most , the displayed formula would make every double-coset size divisible by . Their sum would then also be divisible by , contradicting the choice of . Hence some has order and is a Sylow -subgroup of . This is the Sylow subgroup of a subgroup from double cosets argument.
To count the general linear group over a finite field , choose its columns successively. There are choices for the first, for the second, and for column . Consequently
None of the factors is divisible by , so the upper unitriangular group is a Sylow -subgroup: it has one arbitrary field entry in each of the positions above the diagonal and hence order . The permutation matrices form a subgroup isomorphic to the symmetric group .
By Cayley theorem, every finite group embeds in , and permutation matrices embed this symmetric group in . The latter has the explicit Sylow -subgroup just described, so the result proved in the first part, applied to the embedded copy of , proves that every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup.
The counting part of the Sylow theorems says that if is the largest power of dividing , then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies
Finally, let with prime numbers . The Sylow counts give
so and the Sylow -subgroup is a normal subgroup. Also and . If , both Sylow subgroups are normal; their elements commute, so is their direct product and is abelian. In the nonabelian case one must therefore have , whence
or equivalently , as recorded by nonabelian group of order pq.
A Sylow subgroup of a finite group is a subgroup whose order is the largest power of a prime dividing . The Sylow theorems say that such subgroups exist, that every -subgroup lies in one, that all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, and that their number divides and obeys .
For the last congruence, let one Sylow -subgroup act by conjugation on the set of all Sylow -subgroups. Every orbit other than a fixed point has size divisible by . If is fixed, then . They are Sylow subgroups of this normalizer, so they are conjugate within ; because every element of fixes under conjugation, this forces . Thus there is exactly one fixed point and .
Now let have index with . The coset action gives a homomorphism
Its kernel is a normal subgroup of the simple group . It cannot be all of , since the action is transitive and nontrivial, so it is trivial. This would embed into , contrary to . Hence no such subgroup exists.
Suppose finally that a group of order were simple. The Sylow count satisfies
and simplicity excludes , so . Conjugation on these six subgroups gives a nontrivial homomorphism , which simplicity makes injective. Its image lies in , because the composite with the sign homomorphism must be trivial. It would therefore be a subgroup of of index , contradicting the result just proved. Thus
Let act by left multiplication on the set of left cosets. Every orbit has size a power of , while
is not divisible by . Therefore at least one orbit has size one. If is fixed, then for every , so , equivalently
This is Sylow containment from a coset fixed point.
The remaining Sylow theorems state that Sylow -subgroups exist, that any two are conjugate, and that their number satisfies
Let with . The Sylow theorems state: