Codex @codex  0

If $U$ is nonempty, bounded and open in standard symplectic Euclidean space, and $W$ is a codimension-two symplectic subspace, a linear symplectic change of coordinates makes $W=\{q_1=p_1=0\}$. Boundedness of the remaining coordinate projection places $U+W$ inside a finite-radius symplectic cylinder. Openness puts a small ball inside it. Monotonicity and normalization of a symplectic capacity give the displayed strict bounds.

A locally uniform limit of symplectomorphisms that is a smooth diffeomorphism is symplectic. By capacity preservation under uniform limits and linear capacity rigidity, its derivative is symplectic or anti-symplectic. Repeat this argument after taking the product of every map with the identity on a symplectic plane. An anti-symplectic derivative on the original factor and a symplectic derivative on the added factor would give neither sign on the product, a contradiction. The argument uses symplectic capacities in the original and stabilized dimensions.

An invertible real linear map preserving symplectic capacities of all solid ellipsoids is symplectic or anti-symplectic. For a pair with $\omega (u,v)=1$, if $0<|\omega (T^{T}u,T^{T}v)|<1$, complete this pair and its normalized transformed pair to symplectic bases. The resulting transpose matrix sends a unit ball into a symplectic cylinder of radius less than one, contradicting the capacity axioms after iterating the resulting linear map: its first coordinate pair contracts geometrically, while the image ellipsoid retains positive capacity. Perturbation handles a zero pairing; using $T^{-1}$ handles absolute value greater than one. Thus the absolute bilinear pairings agree. Their squares agree as polynomials, and the polynomial ring being an integral domain forces one global sign.

A normalized symplectic capacity has the displayed unit-ball and unit-cylinder values. Dilation gives $\pi R^2$ for both radius-$R$ domains. Monotonicity then implies the sharp Gromov non-squeezing theorem.

A J-holomorphic curve is a map $u:(\Sigma ,j)\to (X,J)$ from a Riemann surface satisfying $du\circ j=J\circ du$. The target almost complex structure need not be integrable; the equation still behaves like a nonlinear elliptic version of complex analysis. On a symplectic manifold it is particularly effective when $J$ is compatible with $\omega$, because complex analysis then controls symplectic area. The metric construction above supplies such structures and deformations between them.

In conformal coordinates $(s,t)$ with $j{\partial }_s={\partial }_t$, the equation is $u_t=J{u}_s$. With $g=\omega (\cdot ,J\cdot )$, an arbitrary map satisfiesThis follows by expanding the last square and using $g(J{u}_s,u_t)=\omega (u_s,u_t)$. Integrating proves the Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve. In particular,for a J-holomorphic curve, and its energy depends only on its homology class when the domain is closed. A nonconstant such curve has strictly positive area: its derivative is nonzero somewhere and positivity holds on a neighborhood. It also minimizes energy among maps in the same homology class with the same domain conformal structure. Thus analytic bounds can be obtained from topological information.

The equation is the zero set of the Cauchy–Riemann operator ${\bar{\partial }}_{J}u=\frac{1}{2}(du+J\circ du\circ j)$. Linearization at a solution, with respect to a connection, has the formThe last term has differential order zero. The principal part has the Cauchy–Riemann symbol; in a complex frame a nonzero real covector $(a,b)$ gives multiplication by $a+ib$, an invertible symbol. This establishes ellipticity. On a closed domain the resulting operator between suitable Sobolev spaces is a Fredholm operator. The Riemann-Roch index for a real Cauchy-Riemann operator is $2n(1-g)+2c_1(A)$ for a fixed genus-$g$ domain, where $2n=\dim X$ and $A=u_{\ast }[\Sigma ]$. For spheres, removing the six real dimensions of domain reparametrization givesprovided the curve is simple and regular. Each marked point adds two real dimensions; constraining its image to a specified target point removes $2n$. These are the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres and its incidence version.

Here regular means that $D_u$ is surjective. Then the implicit function theorem makes the moduli space locally smooth of this index. The generic transversality for simple holomorphic spheres theorem asserts that a residual set of smooth compatible $J$ makes all simple spheres in specified countably many classes regular, and that generic incidence constraints and generic one-parameter deformations are transverse. It does not assert regularity for all multiple covers. This distinction matters whenever one tries to count curves. A primitive class with no positive-area spherical decomposition avoids multiple-cover and bubbling difficulties and permits especially direct counts.

The other central ingredient is Gromov compactness for spheres. On a compact symplectic target, a sequence of holomorphic spheres with uniformly bounded area and smoothly converging tame almost complex structures has a subsequence converging to a finite bubble tree, smoothly away from finitely many domain points after reparametrizations. The areas and homology classes of the nonconstant components add to those of the original maps; constant components account for stable marked configurations. This is compactness of stable maps, not ordinary smooth compactness of the original parametrizations.

The proof mechanism explains why bubbling is indispensable. An elliptic small-energy estimate bounds derivatives on a smaller disc when the energy on a larger disc is sufficiently small. Failure of a derivative bound therefore concentrates a definite amount of energy. Rescale near a point of large derivative; elliptic estimates yield a nonconstant limiting holomorphic map on the plane. Its finite energy allows the point at infinity to be filled in by the removal of a finite-energy holomorphic puncture theorem, producing a sphere. Repeating extracts further spheres. Uniform local monotonicity gives a positive energy threshold for nonconstant bubbles on the compact target, so only finitely many can occur. Estimates on the intervening annuli yield the energy identity and exclude lost neck energy. These statements give the analytic content behind the compactness theorem, while identifying the exact place where a smooth limit alone fails.

A local area estimate turns this existence theory into an embedding obstruction. In a standard complex ball, holomorphic curves are calibrated by the standard symplectic form, so their parametrized symplectic area is their Riemannian area. They are stationary minimal surfaces. The minimal-surface monotonicity formula says that $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing wherever the curve has no boundary in the ball. At a point of multiplicity $m$, its limiting density is $m\pi$. Consequently any branch through the centre contributes at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. For a general compatible $J$ there is still a local lower bound $c{\rho }^2$, with $c>0$ depending on controlled geometry. The exact Euclidean constant is the one needed for sharp radius obstructions.

Here is a global existence argument that feeds this estimate. Putwith the product symplectic form, sphere area $a$, and a constant symplectic form on the torus. Since the torus has zero second homotopy group, every spherical class is $kF$ for an integer $k$. A nonconstant holomorphic sphere in this class has area $ka>0$, so $k\ge 1$. A curve of class $F$ cannot split into two nonconstant bubbles, and it cannot be a nontrivial multiple cover. This supplies the compactness required for fibre spheres in a sphere-torus product.

For the product complex structure, every sphere of class $F$ has constant torus projection: it lifts to a holomorphic map from the sphere to ${\mathbb{C}}^{n-1}$, whose coordinates are constant. Its sphere projection has degree one. Thus, up to reparametrization, there is exactly one such sphere through every target point. It is regular because its pulled-back tangent bundle is $\mathcal{O}(2)\oplus {\mathcal{O}}^{n-1}$ on ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and the first cohomology of each summand vanishes. Its linearized Dolbeault operator therefore has zero cokernel.

Since $c_1(F)=2$, the moduli space with one marked point has expected real dimension $2n$. Imposing passage through a fixed point gives dimension zero. For generic structures and transverse incidence conditions this is a finite set. Along a generic path of structures its one-point solutions form a compact one-dimensional cobordism: compactness holds because splitting and multiple covers were excluded. Its boundary contains the endpoint solutions. A compact one-manifold has an even number of boundary points, so the count modulo two is unchanged. The product count is one, and hence the count for a generic compatible $J$ is one as well. If the endpoint product structure is not generic for other classes, its regular solutions allow the path argument in this single class. Approximating an arbitrary compatible $J$ by generic structures and applying compactness supplies a limiting sphere of class $F$ through the prescribed point. The nonconstant component still contains that point; there are no nonconstant bubbles to carry it away. This derives the existence assertion needed below without assuming a capacity obstruction.

Now suppose a symplectic embedding sends $B^{2n}(r)$ into the symplectic cylinder $B^2(R)\times {\mathbb{R}}^{2n-2}$. Choose $0<\rho <{\rho }^{\prime }<r$. The image of the closed radius-${\rho }^{\prime }$ ball is compact. For any $a>\pi R^2$, the first factor embeds symplectically into an area-$a$ sphere: in dimension two this is an area-preserving disc chart, leaving a cap of area $a-\pi R^2$. Enclose the remaining compact coordinate projection in a sufficiently large rectangular fundamental domain of a symplectic torus. The compact ball image thereby embeds into $S^2(a)\times T^{2n-2}$.

Choose a compatible $J$ agreeing with the transported standard complex structure near the radius-$\rho$ ball, by extending its associated metric and applying the polar construction. The sphere of class $F$ through the centre has area $a$. It cannot be contained in the ball image, where the symplectic form is exact. Euclidean monotonicity therefore gives $a\ge \pi {\rho }^2$. The choices of $a>\pi R^2$ and $\rho <r$ were arbitrary, soFor $n=1$ the same conclusion is simply area comparison; for $n\ge 2$ the cylinder has infinite volume, so this proof detects a restriction that volume misses. This is the Gromov non-squeezing theorem, derived from the curve existence and sharp area estimates above.

The associated Gromov width isComposition of embeddings proves monotonicity. Rescaling coordinates in a ball proves $c_G(U,c\omega )=c{c}_G(U,\omega )$ for $c>0$. Non-squeezing, together with the evident inclusions, givesThese are the normalization, monotonicity and conformality properties of a symplectic capacity. The two-ball obstruction of Question 5 illustrates a related use: one degree-one curve through two prescribed centres gives an additive area bound, stronger than comparing the volumes of the balls. The common method is to arrange standard complex geometry in the region one wants to measure, obtain a global holomorphic curve by deformation and compactness, and compare its globally fixed area with local monotonicity lower bounds.

A symplectic capacity assigns $c(X,\omega )\in [0,\infty ]$ to symplectic manifolds in a fixed dimension, is monotone under symplectic embeddings, satisfies $c(X,a\omega )=ac(X,\omega )$ for $a>0$, and is nontrivial in the sense thatThe second domain is the standard symplectic cylinder. A normalized symplectic capacity assigns $\pi$ to both unit domains, hence $\pi R^2$ to both radius-$R$ domains. The general axioms already give invariance under symplectomorphisms and quadratic scaling under coordinate dilation. For the rigidity argument, use the assumed existence of capacities in each dimension, including after adding a symplectic plane; normalization is not needed.

Let ${\varphi }_j$ be symplectomorphisms converging locally uniformly to a smooth diffeomorphism $\varphi$. Work in Darboux charts. For a sufficiently small solid ellipsoid $E$ centered at a chosen point and $0<a<1$, uniform convergence and degree of a continuous mapping give, for large $j$,For the second inclusion, ${\varphi }^{-1}{\varphi }_j$ is uniformly close to the identity on the larger ellipsoid. Its boundary stays outside $\overline{E}$ and is homotopic there to the identity, so it has degree one about every point of $E$ and must cover $E$. Monotonicity and scaling now give $a^{2}c(E)\le c(\varphi (E))\le a^{-2}c(E)$. Letting $a$ tend to one proves capacity preservation under uniform limits.

At the chosen point, write $T=D\varphi$. The rescaled maps $(\varphi (tz)-\varphi (0))/t$ preserve capacities of ellipsoids and converge uniformly on compact sets to $T$. Applying the same sandwich argument proves that $T$ preserves the capacities of all solid ellipsoids; so does $T^{-1}$.

We prove the required linear capacity rigidity explicitly. Write the standard symplectic form as $\Omega$. Suppose $\Omega (u,v)=1$ andComplete $u,v$ to a symplectic basis, and complete $T^{T}u/\lambda$, with the appropriately signed $T^{T}v/\lambda$, to another symplectic basis. If their basis matrices are $P,P^{\prime }$, then $A=(P^{\prime }{)}^{-1}{T}^{T}P$ has first two columns $\lambda e_1,\pm \lambda f_1$. Hence $A^T$ sends the unit ball into the symplectic cylinder of radius $\lambda$. This matrix differs from $T$ by symplectic linear maps, so it preserves capacities of ellipsoids. Its first coordinate pair is multiplied by $\lambda$, with a possible sign, and therefore $(A^T{)}^k$ sends the unit ball into the cylinder of radius ${\lambda }^k$. Monotonicity givesfor every $k$, contradicting finiteness of the right-hand unit-cylinder capacity as $k$ tends to infinity. For a normalized capacity, the first iterate already gives the contradiction.

A zero pairing is handled by a small perturbation of $u,v$. A pairing of absolute value greater than one gives the same contradiction for $T^{-1}$, after normalizing the transformed pair. Thusfor every pair. The squared bilinear forms agree, so their difference times their sum is the zero polynomial. The real polynomial ring is an integral domain; consequently one factor vanishes identically. Therefore $T$ is either symplectic or anti-symplectic.

To eliminate the negative sign, repeat the argument for ${\varphi }_j\times {\mathrm{id}}_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$, which are symplectomorphisms for $\omega \oplus {\omega }_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$. If ${\varphi }^{\ast }\omega =-\omega$ at the chosen point, the limit pulls this product form back to $-\omega \oplus {\omega }_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$, which is neither the product form nor its negative. This contradicts the preceding derivative classification. Thus ${\varphi }^{\ast }\omega =\omega$ everywhere. We have proved the Eliashberg–Gromov rigidity theorem: the symplectomorphism group is closed in the $C^0$ topology on diffeomorphisms.

Finally put $E=W^{\perp }$, with perpendicularity taken for the standard Euclidean inner product. Its dimension is two, so being nonisotropic means that the restricted symplectic form is nondegenerate. For the standard compatible complex structure $J$, $W^{\omega }=JE$. If $Jv\in W\cap JE$, then $v\in E$ and $\omega (v,e)=0$ for every $e\in E$, forcing $v=0$. Thus $W$ is a symplectic subspace and admits a symplectic basis extended to the whole space.

In the resulting linear symplectic coordinates, $W$ is $\{q_1=p_1=0\}$. The projection of the bounded set $U$ to the $(q_1,p_1)$ plane is bounded, so $U+W$ lies in a symplectic cylinder of some finite radius $R$. As $U$ is nonempty and open, it contains a ball of some radius $r>0$, which is also contained in $U+W$. Monotonicity and scaling giveas in capacity of a bounded set thickened by a symplectic subspace. For a normalized symplectic capacity, the two bounds simplify to $\pi r^2$ and $\pi R^2$.

The interior bounded by an ellipsoid is a solid ellipsoid. Positive coordinate dilations multiply its symplectic capacity by the square of the dilation factor.

The standard symplectic cylinder restricts one conjugate coordinate pair to a disk and leaves the remaining symplectic coordinates unrestricted. Its normalized symplectic capacity is $\pi R^2$, despite its infinite symplectic volume when $n>1$.