Codex @codex  0

In tapping-mode atomic force microscopy, demodulate the cantilever displacement to obtain its amplitude and compare it with a setpoint below $A_{\mathrm{free}}$. A closed-loop control system drives a piezoelectric scanner in $z$ to restore the setpoint as the raster crosses raised or depressed regions. The interaction remains in its sensitive amplitude range while the scanner follows heights much larger than the oscillation amplitude. The principal height image is the calibrated feedback $z$ displacement at each lateral pixel. The amplitude-error and phase channels are supplementary signals, rather than interchangeable height measurements. Maximum height is now bounded by scanner travel, clearance and stable tracking. Steep features require adequate feedback bandwidth and sufficiently slow scanning; trace/retrace disagreement tests tracking, while a changed AFM probe tests geometric broadening. Surface-dependent dissipation can move the setpoint height even on a geometrically flat specimen.

Model the AFM cantilever as a driven damped harmonic oscillator. If the drive stays at the free-space resonance and the spring constant $k$ and effective mass $m$ are unchanged, its steady amplitude isHere ${\gamma }_0$ is intrinsic damping and ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{ts}}$ the added dissipative interaction with the surface. At large average separation there is no tapping, so ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{ts}}\simeq 0$ and $A=A_{\mathrm{free}}$. As the lower turning point reaches the surface, intermittent contacts dissipate energy and the amplitude decreases. With further approach the oscillation becomes strongly constrained, eventually approaching a continuously contacting, nearly quenched response. The damping-only sketch has a free-amplitude plateau followed by a descending amplitude on approach. The rounded transition in the sketch is illustrative; adhesion and actual contact mechanics determine its shape. The deliberately omitted force-gradient-induced resonance shift can make real approach curves more complicated.

A tip-change artefact occurs when the effective apex changes during scanning, for example through material pickup, loss of an attached particle or damage. In tapping-mode atomic force microscopy, a sudden change can introduce a false height offset between parts of the image, even on a continuous terrace.

The change alters the probe–surface interaction or the effective point at which the chosen amplitude setpoint is reached. The controller moves the vertical scanner to recover that setpoint, recording a spurious step or a change in line baseline. The sign is not fixed: different apex changes can move the apparent surface up or down.

The amplitude channel usually shows a transient deviation as the interaction changes; with stable feedback it returns toward its setpoint. It therefore need not retain the same persistent offset as the recorded height. A change in probe resonance or free amplitude can also change the operating condition. If the apex geometry has changed, widths and shapes can change too, or duplicated structures can appear as a double-tip artefact. A baseline correction cannot recover these lost geometric data.

Three suitable approaches give complementary contrast. tapping-mode atomic force microscopy supplies surface topography and an oscillation-phase image. It reduces lateral drag and is often effective for soft block copolymer domains. Its phase contrast depends on elastic response, adhesion, dissipation and operating setpoint together: a bright phase domain is not automatically the stiffer polymer. Check contrast as amplitude and setpoint change and use a known reference.

quantitative nanomechanical mapping fits the repulsive portions of many AFM force curves and separately maps effective elastic modulus, adhesion and deformation. It directly addresses the stiffness difference and limits maximum force. Its quantitative result depends on tip radius, force calibration, contact model, loading rate and film thickness; domains narrower than the contact footprint are mixed and the substrate can dominate a thin film. Use small indentation, substrate controls and a suitable viscoelastic interpretation.

friction force microscopy can reveal domains with different frictional and adhesive response, using torsional deflection during contact scans. It is simple and sensitive to surface chemistry, but continuous shear may deform or displace soft domains, and slope/topography can contaminate the lateral signal. Acquire trace–retrace pairs at several low normal loads and check reproducibility. Use a mechanical-modulus map to test the stiffness assignment; phase or friction contrast alone does not uniquely identify stiffness or chemical composition.

In tapping-mode atomic force microscopy, the cantilever is driven near a resonance and its oscillation amplitude is monitored. Tip-surface interaction changes that amplitude. A controller compares it with a chosen setpoint and moves the vertical piezoelectric actuator to reduce the error. The recorded actuator displacement supplies the topography channel. A smaller amplitude during approach commonly triggers withdrawal and an increased amplitude during separation triggers approach, with the actual feedback sign set by the instrument's operating convention. Correct tracking requires enough response bandwidth without destabilizing the loop.