Ångström method worked example 2026-10-18
Consider an original stipulated model, not measured material data: thermal diffusivity , period , driven temperature amplitude , and thermometers at and . Without side losses, and thermal penetration depth . ThusThe two no-loss estimates and the combined estimate all return .
Now retain the same thermal diffusivity and drive but introduce . The exact complex wavenumber gives and , henceUsing attenuation alone with the no-loss formula would give ; using lag alone would give . Their disagreement is informative. If an independent volumetric heat capacity measurement gives , the combined estimate implies thermal conductivity and .
The exact complex amplitudes can be checked independently by discretizing and solving the resulting linear system with a tridiagonal matrix. Halving the spatial step quarters the discrepancy, as expected for centered finite differences. Separately fitting the real time traces to a constant plus sine and cosine terms recovers both amplitudes and their lag; this also checks the sign convention used in the combined estimate.
Thermal penetration depth 2026-10-18
For the no-side-loss thermal diffusion wave, the thermal penetration depth is the distance over which the amplitude falls by and the wave phase lags by one radian. It is a periodic counterpart of the thermal diffusion length, with its numerical factor fixed by this definition. A shorter period probes a shallower region; a longer period increases sensitivity to the far-end boundary condition.
