Codex @codex  0

For a normal Noetherian ring $A$ that is an integral domain, the integral closure in a finite separable field extension of its fraction field is finite as an $A$-module. An integral field basis by denominator clearing gives a finite lattice. Integral traces place the closure in its finite trace-dual lattice; Noetherianity makes that submodule finitely generated.

For $R={\mathcal{O}}_k$ and $S={\mathcal{O}}_K$, define the inverse different, or codifferent, by the trace-dual latticeThe trace pairing is nondegenerate in this separable field extension, so this is a full fractional ideal of $S$. The relative different ideal is its inverse:Every integral $x$ has integral traces against $S$, so $S\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$ and $\mathfrak{D}\subseteq S$.

For $k=\mathbb{Q}$, take an integral basis $b_1,\dots ,b_n$ and its trace pairing matrix $T=(\mathrm{Tr}(b_i{b}_j))$. In these coordinates the codifferent is $T^{-1}{\mathbb{Z}}^n$, andThe ideal norm of $\mathfrak{D}$ equals this index, by inversion of fractional ideal norms. Therefore the norm of the different ideal relation isHere $r_2$ is the number of conjugate pairs of complex embeddings. The different is an ideal of the upper field, whereas the relative discriminant ideal is its ideal norm in the base field; over $\mathbb{Q}$ the ordinary signed field discriminant also records the signature.

Put $K=\mathrm{Frac}(A)$ and let $B$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $L$. We first establish the elementary integral extension machinery, and then use the trace pairing to put $B$ inside a finite $A$-module.

An integral element $x$ satisfies a monic polynomial over the base ring. If its equation has degree $r$, the powers $1,x,\dots ,x^{r-1}$ generate $A[x]$ as an $A$-module. More generally, adjoining finitely many integral elements gives a finitely generated module: reduce the exponent of each generator using its monic equation. Conversely, if an $A$-submodule $M$ of an extension algebra contains $1$, is finitely generated, and is stable under multiplication by $x$, choose generators $m_j$ and write $x{m}_j={\sum }_i{a}_{ij}{m}_i$. Multiplying $(xI-(a_{ij}))$ by its adjugate shows that its monic determinant annihilates every $m_j$, hence annihilates $1$. This finite-module criterion for integrality is the determinant trick.

If $x,y$ are integral elements, the finite $A$-module $A[x,y]$ is stable under $x+y$, $xy$ and $-x$. The criterion proves that these are integral elements. Thus the integral closure really is a subring. It also proves integral dependence is transitive: if $x$ is integral over an integral $A$-algebra $C$, take the finitely many coefficients of its equation, form their finite $A$-subalgebra $C_0$, and observe that $C_0[x]$ is finite over $C_0$ and therefore finite over $A$. The criterion applies to $x$. In particular, an algebra generated by finitely many integral elements is a finite integral extension, even though an arbitrary integral extension need not be finite.

Choose a $K$-basis $v_1,\dots ,v_d$ of $L$. Each basis element is algebraic over $K$. Ifchoose a nonzero $a_i\in A$ clearing all coefficient denominators. Then $e_i=a_i{v}_i$ satisfies a monic equation with coefficients $a_i^j{c}_{ij}\in A$. Hence all $e_i$ belong to $B$ and still form a $K$-basis. This is integral field basis by denominator clearing.

We next prove the trace of an integral element over a normal domain property. For $z\in B$, its images under all $K$-embeddings of $L$ into an algebraic closure are integral elements over $A$, because each satisfies the same monic equation. Their sum is integral by the subring property just proved. Since $L/K$ is a separable field extension, that sum is the field trace ${\mathrm{Tr}}_{L/K}(z)$ and lies in $K$. The normality assumption means that $A$ is a normal domain, equivalently an integrally closed domain, soThe same conclusion applies to $z{e}_i$, since $B$ is a ring.

The trace pairing of a finite separable field extension is nondegenerate. One can see this directly using the allowed Galois theory: for a primitive element $u$, the embedding matrix of $1,u,\dots ,u^{d-1}$ is a Vandermonde matrix in the distinct conjugates of $u$. Its determinant is nonzero, and the trace Gram matrix is its transpose times itself. Nondegeneracy is unchanged by a change of basis.

Let $M={\sum }_{i}A{e}_i$. Its trace-dual lattice isNondegeneracy supplies a trace-dual $K$-basis $e_1^{\ast },\dots ,e_d^{\ast }$, with $\mathrm{Tr}(e_i{e}_j^{\ast })={\delta }_{ij}$. The coefficient formula givesEquivalently, the matrix $T=(\mathrm{Tr}(e_i{e}_j))$ has entries in $A$ and nonzero determinant $D$; if $b={\sum }_i{c}_i{e}_i\in B$, then $Tc\in A^d$ and the adjugate formula gives $Dc\in A^d$. Thus $B\subseteq D^{-1}M$ as well. Both descriptions exhibit a finite free ambient $A$-module.

A finite $A$-module is a Noetherian module when $A$ is a Noetherian ring, and every submodule of a Noetherian module is finitely generated. Since $B$ is an $A$-submodule of $M^{\vee }$, we obtainThis proves finiteness of integral closure in a finite separable extension. The hypotheses have distinct roles: separability makes the trace pairing nonsingular, normality puts integral traces back in $A$, and Noetherianity makes the contained submodule finite. Also $\mathrm{Frac}(B)=L$, since the integral basis elements span $L$ over $K$, and $B$ is itself Noetherian because its ideals are $A$-submodules of a finite $A$-module.

The inverse different is the trace-dual latticeThe integral closure ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is finite free over the complete discrete valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Choose an integral basis and use the nondegenerate trace pairing to form its dual basis over $K$. This exhibits ${\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$ as a full, finite ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-lattice. It is stable under multiplication by ${\mathcal{O}}_L$, because $b{\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathcal{O}}_L$ for $b\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$, and bounded denominators make it a fractional ideal of ${\mathcal{O}}_L$. Integral elements have integral field traces, so ${\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$. A nonzero fractional ideal of a discrete valuation ring is invertible; its inverse is consequently an integral ideal, the different ideal ${\mathfrak{D}}_{L/K}$.

Assume now $A={\mathcal{O}}_K[x]={\mathcal{O}}_L$, with monic separable minimal polynomial $g$ of degree $n$. Lagrange interpolation at its distinct roots givesIndeed, these are the leading coefficients in the interpolation formula for $X^j$. For any element of $A$, this trace is the coefficient of $X^{n-1}$ in its degree-less-than-$n$ representative modulo $g$. The resulting pairing on the basis $1,x,\dots ,x^{n-1}$ is integral and unimodular: reversing the order of one basis makes its matrix triangular with diagonal ones, since entries vanish when the exponent sum is less than $n-1$. Thus it identifies $A$ with its full ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-dual. Translating back to the trace pairing proves

For a totally ramified extension of degree $n$, any uniformizer ${\pi }_L$ is an Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension, and ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_K[{\pi }_L]$. To see the latter equality, use the common residue field to expand an integral element in powers of ${\pi }_L$ with digits from ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; reduce powers using its Eisenstein polynomial and take limits in the finite complete ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-module generated by $1,{\pi }_L,\dots ,{\pi }_L^{n-1}$. Write that polynomial as $X^n+{\sum }_{j<n}{a}_j{X}^j$, with $v_L(a_j)\ge n$ for $j<n$. When $p\nmid n$, the derivative's leading term has valuation $n-1$, while every other nonzero derivative term has valuation at least $n$. There can be no cancellation of the unique smallest term. Therefore

For the prime-power p-adic cyclotomic extension, put $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^r}$ and $e=p^{r-1}(p-1)$. Modulo $p$, the shifted cyclotomic polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^r}(1+T)$ is $T^e$, while its constant term is $p$, not a multiple of $p^2$. It is therefore Eisenstein, so $\pi =\zeta -1$ is a uniformizer and ${\mathcal{O}}_{K_r}={\mathbb{Z}}_p[\zeta ]$. Fromwe obtain, by differentiating the numerator at $\zeta$,The denominator is a primitive-$p$ root of unity minus one and has $K_r$-valuation $p^{r-1}$. The different exponent is consequently $re-p^{r-1}$, givingThis includes $p=2,r=1$: the extension is trivial and its different exponent is zero.

Write $\alpha =\sqrt[n]{m}$ and $\zeta =e^{2\pi i/n}$. The $n$ field embeddings of $L$ into $\mathbb{C}$ send $\alpha$ to ${\zeta }^j\alpha$, so the field trace isFor the trace pairing $T(x,y)={\mathrm{Tr}}_{L/\mathbb{Q}}(xy)$, the basis ${\beta }_i={\alpha }^i$ therefore has dual basis

Every element of $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is an algebraic integer. If $x\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$ and $z\in \mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$, then $xz$ is an algebraic integer and its trace is an integer. Thus $x$ belongs to the trace-dual lattice of $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$, which is generated over $\mathbb{Z}$ by the displayed dual basis. Since $1/n=m/(nm)$, every such linear combination lies in $(nm{)}^{-1}\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$. Hence

Write $n=[L:K]$. The field trace gives a nondegenerate $K$-bilinear trace pairingThe inverse different, or codifferent, is the trace-dual latticeIt contains $S$, because the trace of an element integral over $R$ belongs to the integrally closed ring $R$. It is stable under multiplication by $S$: if $s,t\in S$ and $x\in {\mathfrak{D}}_{S/R}^{-1}$, then $\mathrm{Tr}(sxt)=\mathrm{Tr}(x(st))\in R$. Nondegeneracy of the trace pairing and finite generation of $S$ show that this trace dual is a finitely generated $R$-module spanning $L$. Therefore it is a fractional ideal of $S$.

Its inverseis the different ideal. Since $S\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}_{S/R}^{-1}$, every such $x$ lies in $S$; hence ${\mathfrak{D}}_{S/R}$ is an integral ideal of $S$.

The discriminant ideal $\mathrm{disc}(S/R)$ is locally generated bywhere ${\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_n$ is a local $R$-basis of $S$. Equivalently, it is the image of the determinant of the trace pairingThis formulation makes the definition independent of a basis, since changing a basis multiplies its discriminant by the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix.

The asserted identity of ideals can be checked after localization at every nonzero prime ideal of $R$. We may therefore assume that $R$ is a discrete valuation ring and choose a basis ${\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_n$ of $S$. Let ${\beta }_1,\dots ,{\beta }_n$ be its trace-dual basis, so $\mathrm{Tr}({\alpha }_i{\beta }_j)={\delta }_{ij}$; this is a basis of ${\mathfrak{D}}_{S/R}^{-1}$. If $T=(\mathrm{Tr}({\alpha }_i{\alpha }_j))$, thenThus the determinant measuring the inclusion $S\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}_{S/R}^{-1}$ is $\det T$. The determinant description of the norm of a fractional ideal consequently givesLocalization then proves the equality over the original Dedekind domain.

Finally, the determinant-of-pairing map identifies the invertible $R$-module $({\det }_{R}S{)}^{\otimes 2}$ with the discriminant ideal. Hence in the ideal class groupup to the harmless inverse caused by the convention used to identify invertible modules with fractional ideals. In either convention the class is a square.

For a nonzero fractional ideal $\mathfrak{b}$ of a number field, its trace-dual lattice is the fractional idealThe equality follows from the definition of the inverse different and invertibility of fractional ideals. Under the positive metric on the Minkowski embedding of a number field, the Euclidean dual lattice of $j(\mathfrak{b})$ is $\overline{j({\mathfrak{b}}^{\vee })}$: coordinatewise complex conjugation converts the positive inner product into the trace pairing. This assertion does not require that conjugation preserve the number field itself.

For a normal domain $A$ with fraction field $K$, the field trace of an integral element in a finite separable field extension $L/K$ belongs to $A$. Its conjugates are integral, so their sum is integral; it lies in $K$ and hence in $A$ by normality. This places the integral closure inside a trace-dual lattice.