Transverse mass 2026-10-18
For a two-body W boson decay into a charged lepton and a neutrino, neglect both daughter masses and use natural units . Let be the angle between the daughter transverse momenta. Identifying the missing transverse momentum with the neutrino's gives
This observable uses no . The 1983 UA1 experiment paper already used transverse mass as a lower bound on parent mass, before making additional decay-model assumptions for a mass estimate.[ref]
The bound follows directly from the energy–momentum relation. For each massless daughter write its four-momentum, using rapidity and azimuth , as
Using the Minkowski inner product with positive time sign, , the two daughter four-momenta give the true parent invariant mass :
Since , , with equality at equal daughter rapidities when both transverse momenta are nonzero. Thus the unmeasured longitudinal information can enlarge the true invariant mass, but cannot lower it below this ideal transverse mass.
For an original example, stipulate and . Then . Equal rapidities give ; choosing with exactly the same transverse readout gives . One measured transverse configuration therefore permits different true parent masses.
For two visible, approximately massless leptons, both measured four-momenta enter
This is a reconstructed invariant mass, including longitudinal information, rather than the lower bound obtained from transverse mass. As an original example, two opposite-azimuth leptons with and equal rapidities have . Changing their rapidity difference to one raises it to about , even though their transverse momenta are unchanged.
Figure 1.
One visible lepton plus inferred transverse imbalance versus two reconstructed lepton four-momenta
. Original functional cross sections and invented massless examples in natural units. Solid blue arrows represent visible charged leptons; orange patches represent calorimeter energy deposits. The dashed arrow is inferred missing transverse momentum and supplies no direct neutrino hit or longitudinal measurement. No historical events, mass spectra or fitted discovery data are reproduced. Details.
The ideal transverse mass bound concerns the actual event's parent invariant mass, not a perfectly sharp universal number. A finite decay width spreads parent invariant masses; particle jet recoil changes daughter directions; invariant-mass resolution, momentum resolution and imperfect reconstruction can smear an observed endpoint. Recoil alone does not invalidate the ideal inequality when both daughter transverse momenta are correct. Additional invisible particles, radiated photons and a massless-daughter approximation can invalidate the simple two-body reconstruction. Likewise, a Z boson pair-mass peak requires control of identification, detection efficiency, instrumental response and backgrounds. A peak position and an endpoint are different summaries of selected event populations.