Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Two absolute values on a field are equivalent absolute values when they induce the same topology. For nontrivial absolute values on a field this is equivalent tofor a fixed real number . The trivial absolute value is equivalent only to itself.
Restriction of a Non-Archimedean absolute value plainly preserves the ultrametric inequality. Conversely, if the restriction is non-Archimedean, every integer, interpreted in either field, has absolute value on a field at most one. In particular every binomial coefficient has absolute value on a field at most one. The triangle inequality applied to the binomial expansion gives, for and every positive integer ,Raise both sides to the power and let . Since , this yieldsThis is the bounded-integer criterion for a non-Archimedean absolute value. The proof works for arbitrary field extensions, not just algebraic ones, and in positive characteristic as well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First include the trivial absolute value if that convention is allowed. For a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value on , every integer has absolute value on a field at most one, and some nonzero integer has absolute value on a field less than one: otherwise every nonzero rational number, being a quotient of two integers, would have absolute value on a field one. Factoring that integer shows that some prime number has .
There cannot be two such prime numbers. If and for distinct prime numbers, choose integers with . Then the ultrametric inequality givesEvery other prime number therefore has absolute value on a field one. Factoring numerator and denominator of a rational number givesThus the nontrivial equivalence classes are precisely the p-adic absolute values, one for each prime number.
Now let be a number field, with ring of integers of a number field . If the restriction of an absolute value on a field to is trivial, a monic polynomial over satisfied by forces : if , its leading term would strictly dominate the other terms. Applying the same argument to forces for . Thus a nontrivial absolute value on a field defined on has a nontrivial restriction, associated with some prime number .
Every has , by applying the same leading-term argument to its monic integral equation. Consequentlyis a proper prime ideal: it is an ideal by the ultrametric inequality, and with implies that at least one factor has absolute value on a field less than one. It is nonzero because it contains .
The localization lies in the valuation ring of the absolute value on a field: a denominator outside has absolute value on a field one. Since is a Dedekind domain, is a discrete valuation ring. Choose its uniformizer . Each has a unique expressionBoth and lie in the valuation ring, so . Also belongs to its maximal ideal, hence . Therefore .
Conversely each nonzero prime ideal of gives the Non-Archimedean absolute value for any , using the discrete valuation of . All choices of are equivalent, and different prime ideals are distinguished by the elements of having absolute value on a field less than one. We have proved Non-Archimedean absolute values on a number field:The trivial class is additional when trivial absolute values on a field are admitted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The intended statement uses a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value. Under that convention choose with . A compact neighborhood of zero contains an open ball of some radius . For sufficiently large , is contained in that ball. The valuation ring is closed, so is a closed subset of and is compact. Scaling shows that itself is compact.
Its maximal ideal is open. The residue field is therefore discrete and compact, hence finite: the open cover by its singleton sets has a finite subcover. Since has finite index, its complement is a finite union of open cosets. Thus is also closed and compact.
The continuous absolute value on a field attains its maximum on . Nontriviality supplies a nonzero element there, so this maximum is for some , with . If , then , so .
For arbitrary , choose the integer for which . Then . This element cannot lie in , by maximality of , so its absolute value on a field is one. Therefore . This proves discrete valuation from nontrivial local compactness:
The nontrivial valuation in the local compactness criterion is essential. If the trivial absolute value is admitted, the displayed source claim is false: take with that absolute value on a field. It is complete and discrete, hence locally compact, but its valuation ring and residue field are both , which is infinite. The intended nontrivial case has been proved above.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 28 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Every Non-Archimedean absolute value on is either the trivial absolute value, or for a unique prime and some . Here .
To prove this classification, the ultrametric inequality gives for all integers . If every nonzero integer has absolute value one, multiplicativity makes the absolute value on a field trivial on all rational numbers. Otherwise some positive integer has absolute value less than one, and its prime factorization gives a prime with . There cannot be two such primes: if and with integers , then , a contradiction. Every other prime consequently has absolute value one. Unique prime factorization now givesConversely these are Non-Archimedean absolute values, by the valuation inequality . Thus . This is the non-Archimedean part of Ostrowski theorem, including the trivial case.