Electric-field coupling to nematic order 2026-10-05
The leading scalar coupling of an electric field to the nematic order parameter is quadratic in the field and linear in the tensor. For uniaxial nematic order, it is . When , minimization aligns the nematic director with the field axis and adds to the scalar Landau free energy.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 344 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The nematic order parameter is a symmetric second-rank tensor and a traceless second-rank tensor describing orientational anisotropy. For molecular unit axes , is proportional to . It vanishes in an isotropic phase and is unchanged by head-tail reversal , unlike a polar order parameter. For uniaxial nematic order, the nematic director is thus an unoriented axis.
One convention for the Landau-de Gennes free energy through fourth order, respecting rotational symmetry, isFor a traceless second-rank tensor in three dimensions, the Cayley-Hamilton theorem gives , so there is only one independent quartic rotational invariant of a symmetric traceless tensor. The only possible linear scalar is ; without an external anisotropy no linear term survives.
The cubic rotational invariant of a symmetric traceless tensor distinguishes prolate and oblate forms of uniaxial nematic order. Head-tail reversal leaves unchanged and does not impose . Thus a cubic term is allowed in three dimensions and generically produces a first-order phase transition, rather than a symmetry-enforced continuous onset. In two dimensions a symmetric traceless second-rank tensor has eigenvalues , hence : the cubic invariant vanishes identically in two dimensions. This is a statement about the Landau free energy; fluctuations in two dimensions require a separate treatment.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 344 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For the stated uniaxial nematic order normalization, the nematic director is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue , and the two perpendicular eigenvalues are . ThereforeUsing precisely the Landau-de Gennes free energy convention in the preceding solution givesIf the quartic invariant were instead normalized as , its coefficient would be ; the physical predictions are unchanged after redefining .
For a nonzero global minimizer of the free energy, compare opposite values of the scalar nematic order parameter:The lower one has , soThe claim concerns the stable ordered phase, not every metastable stationary point. For the two signs are degenerate. For , equality of the ordered and isotropic free energies, together with stationarity, gives and . The finite jump exhibits the first-order phase transition driven by the cubic invariant.
Choose a basis whose first axis is . The tensor with uniaxial nematic order then has eigenvalues . Hence , and . Substitution givesFor , remains a local minimum with curvature . Its nonzero stationary points satisfy , soThey first appear at as a stationary inflection point; for more negative , is a local maximum and a local minimum. The latter is initially metastable, becomes degenerate with at , and then becomes the global minimum as decreases further. This is a first-order transition in a cubic-quartic Landau potential: the order changes discontinuously. The saddle-node bifurcation creating a local minimum is not the coexistence condition. The isotropic minimum never loses local stability in this fixed positive- scan.
The illustrative plots set and show . A cubic invariant is permitted because head-tail reversal leaves unchanged; it does not implement . The physical range of a uniaxial nematic order parameter imposes ; the usual small-order-parameter Landau result assumes the displayed minimum lies in that interval. The unrestricted quartic graphs express the intended Landau model, with the effect of enforcing the bound stated in part (f).[ref]
Lectures on Landau Theory of Phase Transitions by Peter D. Olmsted. §4.3, printed pp.11–13, tensor invariants and cubic-term-driven coexistence; coefficient normalization here is derived from this paper's definition of
