Couette flow with a slipping lower wall 2026-10-14
Consider steady flow of a Newtonian fluid in incompressible flow with constant dynamic viscosity between parallel plates at and . The bottom plate is stationary and obeys the Navier slip boundary condition with slip length . The top plate moves at velocity and obeys the no-slip boundary condition. There is no streamwise pressure gradient or body force. The Couette flow solution isHere is the constant shear stress magnitude. The lower wall's Navier slip boundary condition holds exactly because . At the top, is exactly the prescribed no-slip boundary condition; no finite upper-wall slip length is imposed in this example.
For a numerical example, stipulate , , and . The bottom velocity is and the shear stress is , compared with when both plates obey the no-slip boundary condition. The extrapolated profile reaches zero at .
For fixed , and , recovers . As , throughout the gap and : the moving upper wall selects the limiting uniform velocity, while the lower wall approaches a stress-free boundary condition. The dynamic viscosity stays positive; the disappearing shear stress comes from the disappearing velocity gradient.
A short derivation uses unidirectional flow: the convective acceleration vanishes and the Navier-Stokes equation reduces to . Write . The bottom condition gives and the top condition gives .
Past exam of the advanced fluid dynamics course of the University of Oxford 2016 2 b ii Solution 2026-10-25
Linearize about a relaxed state with constant mass density . In the unforced momentum conservation equation , the component of the pressure gradient is zero for a freely evolving unidirectional flow independent of . A prescribed external pressure gradient would add a forcing term.
For , incompressibility is automatic and the only nonzero entries of the rate-of-strain tensor are . Products of stress and velocity gradient are quadratic in the small amplitude. The constitutive equation consequently becomes to first order. With , its shear component and the component of momentum conservation areThe diagonal stress components have only homogeneous relaxation at this order and vanish if initially relaxed. In particular, does not enter this linear response.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 2 7C a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For this steady unidirectional flow, the convective acceleration vanishes because depends only on . The axial Navier-Stokes equation reduces to , with . The no-slip boundary conditions therefore giveThis is a superposition of Couette flow and pressure-driven Poiseuille flow.
For the unidirectional flow , incompressibility gives . Hence , and the convective acceleration vanishes. The transverse components of the Navier-Stokes equation give , while the axial component givesA steady-flow assumption is implicit in the question. Neither unidirectional flow nor a time-independent pressure gradient alone eliminates : a decaying transient can be superposed on the final pipe profile. The native PDF does not explicitly say steady flow in this part. For the intended steady flow, , and thereforeTaking the pipe walls to be stationary, the no-slip boundary condition isThe no-penetration boundary condition is already satisfied by the assumed velocity field. This is the Poisson equation defining rectangular duct flow.
Rectangular duct flow 2026-10-25
Rectangular duct flow is steady flow of a Newtonian fluid down a straight rectangular pipe under a constant axial pressure gradient . For stationary walls and unidirectional flow, incompressibility eliminates axial dependence and the Navier-Stokes equation becomes a two-dimensional Poisson equation with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions. Subtracting a plane Poiseuille flow profile leaves a harmonic function that repairs the side-wall values using separation of variables. Uniqueness follows from Green's first identity: the difference of two solutions has zero boundary values and zero integral of the squared gradient, and hence vanishes.
