Suppose with convergence in probability. For real and , the elementary inequality gives
First let , then let . The characteristic functions converge pointwise to that of , which is continuous at zero. The Lévy continuity theorem gives convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution.
For the converse, let have the fair Bernoulli distribution, put , and set for every . All have the same probability distribution as , so . But always, hence
There is no convergence in probability to . In this example does have convergence in probability to : the counterexample concerns the converse with the specified limit , as usual. If one interprets the question as denying convergence in probability to any limit, take for even and for odd . Its probability distribution is still constant, while the two subsequences have distinct limits from almost sure convergence, ruling out any common limit in probability by uniqueness of a limit in probability.
For the dyadic power variation of a continuous local martingale, write , and . Uniform continuity on gives almost surely, while the deterministic-partition characterization of quadratic variation gives in probability. In particular is bounded in probability.
If , then , and a factor tending to zero in probability times a sequence bounded in probability tends to zero in probability. Thus
If , the reverse comparison is . The assumed finite makes eventually bounded almost surely, so almost surely. By uniqueness of a limit in probability, almost surely. Its monotonicity gives for .
To finish without assuming any integrability of , apply the bound from part (i) to both and , with , and then let . For each the probability of a positive or negative excursion beyond is zero. Taking countably many proves is indistinguishable from zero on . The same argument in fact works for every under the stated pathwise boundedness assumption.
By Brownian scaling,
where has the standard three-dimensional multivariate normal distribution. The right-hand side tends to zero in probability, since has no atom at the origin. Part (d) gives almost-sure convergence to , which also implies convergence in probability to . Uniqueness of a limit in probability therefore gives almost surely. Hence almost surely, proving the transience of Brownian motion in dimension at least three in dimension three.