Use the leading nonrelativistic magnetic coupling for an electronic level with total angular momentum operator , and choose the axis along a uniform external magnetic field , . Write its magnetic quantum number as , so . There are possibilities from to . With Landé g-factor , the first-order shift isHere is the magnitude of the Electron electric charge, its mass, the Planck constant, and the Bohr magneton. Both and are dimensionless; with measured in tesla and in joules per tesla, is in joules. The photon frequency shift is in hertz, not angular frequency; indices denote upper and lower levels. NIST states this weak-field convention and its orbital/spin assumptions explicitly.[ref]
12. Zeeman Effect. Atomic Spectroscopy - A Compendium of Basic Ideas, Notation, Data, and Formulas by William C. Martin and Wolfgang Wiese; Atomic Spectroscopy, §12, Eqs. (6)–(8): magnetic-sublevel shift, tesla convention and magnetic splitting factor
The sign follows directly from magnetic dipole potential energy. Within this electronic multiplet, the projected magnetic dipole moment is . Therefore has the displayed positive coefficient. Subtracting the shifts of the two levels and using photon energy gives the transition formula. For the orbital case, gives the same leading frequency spacing as the classical charged oscillator. This explains the historical sensitivity to charge divided by mass; the quantum state derivation here is modern.
“Weak” compares interaction energies: mixing with neighbouring fine structure levels must be small, so remains a useful quantum number. The formula keeps the term linear in and neglects quadratic shifts. It also omits hyperfine structure; if that is resolved and controls the coupling, the appropriate total electronic-plus-nuclear angular momentum and splitting factor must replace . Weak compared with fine structure does not automatically mean weak compared with hyperfine structure.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.