The chosen direction for specifying an angular-momentum projection quantum number. An applied field can provide a physically distinguished axis; polarization labels and magnetic-sublevel selection rules are defined relative to it.
A common eigenstate of and must satisfy by their commutator. Applying the other angular-momentum commutators then forces both remaining eigenvalues to vanish. Thus the state lies in a spin-zero sector. Noncommuting components do not possess a general common eigenbasis, but spin-zero states are an important exception to the claim that they can never share any eigenstate.
The axis and angle of a product of rotations are properties of the group elements, independent of which spin representation acts on a state. Higher-spin generators do not obey the two-term Pauli exponential, but representations preserve the resulting rotation product. The central rotation acts as .
The normalized periodic state on , zero on the remaining semicircle, has and . Projection on gives probability for . Its first derivative is continuous at the joins, so integration by parts has no boundary contribution.
For a normalized periodic angular wavefunction, . A real periodic wavefunction with matching boundary values has zero mean, even though nonzero angular momenta can have positive measurement probabilities.
A rank- spherical tensor operator has components , , that transform under rotation like an angular momentum . Equivalently, their commutators with the angular momentum operator satisfy
For a vector operator, the rank is one and a conventional choice is , . The Wigner-Eckart theorem separates the matrix elements of a spherical tensor operator into Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and a reduced matrix element.
Each orbital angular momentum operator annihilates a radial factor and . Direct differentiation gives and . Hence the displayed trace-free quadratic polynomial, times any admissible radial factor, has orbital labels . Its angular dependence is proportional to the spherical harmonic ; subtracting removes the rotational scalar part.
The operator acts by . It generates lower magnetic states and determines Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
In an irreducible spin representation, the angular momentum lowering operator has squared norm factor . Multiplying these factors from the highest-weight vector gives the factorial normalization displayed above. All factorial arguments are integers even when is half-integral. This produces a consistent positive-coefficient phase convention for all weight states and fixes signs in subsequent isospin rotations.
A joint eigenstate of and , with eigenvalues and . Its allowed labels satisfy and .
Every angular momentum operator satisfies
For two subsystems, the total operator is , and . The coupled basis diagonalizes and .
For dimensionless angular momentum operators and a Hamiltonian at fixed , addition of angular momentum gives . Subtracting neighbouring energy levels proves the displayed rule. For fine structure substitute and total ; for magnetic-dipole hyperfine structure use electronic , nuclear spin and total . Electric-quadrupole interactions and mixing with nearby energy levels can violate the rule.
Consecutive positive gaps obey for an isolated hyperfine multiplet governed by the magnetic-dipole hyperfine interaction. Their common difference estimates , and the first gap divided by that scale identifies the first higher F. The endpoints of the resulting F ladder constrain I and J. Gap magnitudes alone do not fix the sign of A or an absolute nuclear g-factor.
Let count states of fixed angular momentum projection in a finite rotational representation, and its spin- multiplicity. Every spin- irreducible representation contributes one state at each . Thus for nonnegative , and subtraction gives . Counting occupation states first incorporates Bose-Einstein statistics before decomposing identical-boson angular states.
Exchanging the factors in the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition of two equal spins gives the phase . This follows from the exchange symmetry of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. The total exchange parity includes the spatial state and any other internal factors: the spin parity alone does not impose the full symmetrization postulate. For two half-integer spins, even is spin-antisymmetric and odd spin-symmetric.
For identical fermions restricted to one angular-momentum multiplet , with all other one-particle labels fixed, the Pauli exclusion principle permits distinct angular momentum projections . Their sum is , provided . The resulting Slater determinant is killed by the total raising angular momentum ladder operator because raising any occupied state either exceeds or duplicates an occupied state. It is therefore a highest-weight vector of precisely this total angular momentum. The formula is invariant under replacing particles by holes in the full shell.
Coupling orbital angular momentum to spin one-half produces . The dimensions add as . A change between coupled and product bases changes labels, not the dimension of the Hilbert space.
For three distinguishable spin one-half systems, the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition first combines two spins into , then couples the third: and . Thus the tensor product has one quartet and two doublets. A Hamiltonian operator depending only on the total and acts identically on the two doublet copies. In particular has energy eigenvalues , generically once for each quartet projection and twice for each doublet projection. Equal numerical energies have their multiplicities added.
An atomic addition of angular momentum scheme in which the individual orbital angular momentum vectors first combine into and the individual spins into , then these combine into total angular momentum . When spin-orbit coupling is weak compared with the interactions between electrons described by electrostatics, and remain useful approximate quantum numbers. The Landé g-factor describes the resulting weak-field magnetic splitting.
For electrons in distinct radial orbitals, angular coupling permits all from to and both total spins . A p-s pair therefore gives singlet and triplet P terms. A nonequivalent p-p pair gives singlet and triplet S, P and D terms. The equivalent-subshell exclusion restrictions do not remove these nonequivalent terms. Counting gives 12 p-s and 36 p-p microstates, matching products of one-electron state counts.
Two equivalent electrons require an antisymmetric complete state. Orbital exchange has parity and the spin singlet is antisymmetric, giving allowed even. The terms are , and , with states, equal to . Hund ordering puts lowest for the less-than-half-filled configuration.
For a composite quantum system, the total angular momentum operator is the sum of the constituent angular momenta, with each summand acting on its own tensor factor. Its simultaneous eigenstates with organize the state space into total-spin sectors.
A total-spin- sector is an irreducible subspace on which has eigenvalue . For two spin-one particles, Clebsch-Gordan decomposition gives sectors of dimensions one, three, and five.
Coupling three distinguishable spin-one systems gives
where the labels denote total spin and coefficients denote multiplicities. The dimensions are respectively , , , and , summing to .
The completely symmetric subspace of three spin-one systems has dimension
and decomposes into one total-spin- multiplet and one total-spin- multiplet:
The highest-weight product state generates the seven-dimensional spin- multiplet; its three-dimensional invariant complement is spin .
The spin-one Cartesian basis transforms as a three-dimensional vector under rotations. In its two-site tensor square, the scalar, antisymmetric, and symmetric traceless subspaces are respectively the total-spin , , and sectors.
For a spin-one Hamiltonian , Cartesian basis energies are , and zero along the basis labels. The state combines the latter two basis vectors equally. Their relative phase produces the displayed spin-reversal probability. Complete reversal occurs at odd multiples of if ; when it vanishes those two components remain degenerate. Individual matrix signs depend on basis conventions, while the commutators and physical probability must remain consistent.
For two spins of magnitude , . For two spin-one particles its eigenvalues in total-spin sectors are in units of .
For , angular momentum addition gives one copy of . The identity gives the four eigenvalues in the title, with state degeneracy . These exhaust the spin space. If the particles are identical fermions, an appropriate spatial exchange parity accommodates each sector; only a specified spatial restriction can remove sectors.
The tensor product of spin- and spin- irreducible representations decomposes into one copy of each spin
The change-of-basis entries between uncoupled and coupled states are Clebsch--Gordan coefficients.
Put , with both . At magnetic quantum number , let raise only the first factor of the lowest product state and raise only the second. Applying total to the lowest product gives the normalized combination . Its orthogonal combination is annihilated by total and therefore has . This obtains a useful Clebsch-Gordan coefficients without a table.
With , the maximal state is the product . Lowering it once gives
The orthogonal combination is the highest-weight state .
Two equal spins have the unique total-spin-zero state
It is invariant under joint rotations.
A singlet state is the one-dimensional rotation representation; this construction supplies the angular-momentum-zero case for two equal spins.
In the product basis for two spin-one particles, total magnetic quantum number zero allows only , and . Applying the total ladder operators to gives
A singlet state is annihilated by and , so . Wavefunction normalization gives the displayed state, up to an overall phase. Here the ket on the left of the title formula has total-spin labels, while its right-hand kets have individual magnetic labels. The state is symmetric under exchanging the particles, although no exchange constraint is needed for distinguishable particles.
For two spin-one-half particles, the singlet is
Every component of the total spin annihilates it, and has eigenvalue zero.
The symmetric two-particle states
form the spin-one triplet. On this subspace, has eigenvalue .
Spin operators satisfy and are Hermitian traceless generators of rotations in finite-dimensional irreducible representations.
The uncertainty of a spin projection is measured by its variance. In a maximally polarized spin coherent state, the longitudinal variance is zero and each transverse variance is in units . The transverse fluctuations do not imply finite magnon occupation in an isotropic ferromagnet's polarized vacuum.
A classical spin is a fixed-length vector representing the orientation of a local magnetic moment. A classical limit of a large quantum spin replaces its components by this vector and minimizes the resulting energy. Its length is conventionally at leading order, whereas the exact quantum squared-spin eigenvalue is in units .
The total spin is the vector sum of subsystem spin operators and generates their simultaneous rotation. For a rotationally invariant Heisenberg model, both its squared magnitude and any chosen component commute with the Hamiltonian. An anisotropic exchange or field can preserve only a component.
A spin rotation acts on a quantum state through the unitary representation generated by its angular momentum operators. With , rotation by angle about axis is . Simultaneously rotating every site is a global symmetry of an isotropic Heisenberg model.
If the Hamiltonian commutes with total , simultaneous spin rotations form a circle group symmetry. In a state of definite total , the transverse one-point averages vanish because change that eigenvalue. A chosen classical orientation or symmetry-breaking limit requires separate care when constructing a linear spin-wave approximation.
A spin operator describes intrinsic angular momentum. Its components obey angular-momentum commutators; for spin one half, in terms of the Pauli matrices.
For a spin-half particle with and , exponentiating the Pauli matrices gives a rotation about the field axis. A field along evolves initial -up spin to . The sign of sets the precession direction. spin parallel to the field is conserved even while transverse components vary.
For a state initially -up and precessing about , measurement along has the displayed probabilities. eigenvectors can be chosen as and . Their phases must be retained when taking inner products. Full rotation changes their signs but leaves isolated-state probabilities unchanged.
For spin one-half, the Pauli representation makes every diagonal quadratic component a multiple of the identity. Thus cannot split the doublet or cause spin reversal. This conclusion is special to this quadratic Hamiltonian and does not exclude linear Zeeman dynamics.
A wavefunction intended for a specified total-spin state contains components of other total spins. For an unrestricted determinant with one alpha and one beta orbital, in units of .
A state with total spin angular momentum quantum number has magnetic projections. A singlet state has , a triplet state has , and the chromium ground term is a septet.
The two-site quantum version of an XY model couples the transverse components of two spin one-half degrees of freedom. In the ordered basis , its only off-diagonal entries are . The parallel states have energies and ; the symmetric and antisymmetric opposite-spin combinations have energies and respectively. The latter is the singlet state. The formulas remain valid at accidental degeneracies.
A spin eigenstate along a specified axis is a simultaneous eigenstate of the squared spin operator and its component . Its eigenvalues are and , where . The axis must be specified because components along different axes generally do not commute. For spin one-half, the two field-axis eigenstates have projections and form the branches of a Stern-Gerlach experiment.
A spin-spin interaction couples two spin angular momenta. In an isotropic model it is proportional to their dot product, whose expectation in a total-pair-spin state follows from . Magnetic interactions generate examples in atoms and effective colour-magnetic interactions in hadron models.
For a spin-one-half ensemble, spin polarization measures unequal occupation or coherent alignment of spin states. A spin-dependent energy splitting does not alone determine the ensemble's response: occupation, temperature and spin relaxation matter. A spin polarization is distinct from a net change of charge density and from the optical polarization of waves.
For two levels separated by and with the plus label assigned to the upper level, thermal equilibrium gives . The weak-splitting limit is . Labels based on the lower-energy aligned moment reverse the reported sign without changing the population imbalance.
A beam's unequal population of spin projections along a specified axis. For spin-one-half particles the displayed longitudinal polarization uses populations parallel and antiparallel to the momentum. An unpolarized beam has equal populations and requires an initial-spin average in a cross section; a polarized beam weights the corresponding helicity amplitudes differently. This differs from photon linear polarization.
A spin texture describes how a spin expectation value or spin polarization varies with position or wavevector. It specifies a vector field, including its magnitude when that matters; a direction field alone is undefined wherever that magnitude vanishes. A Rashba spin texture is an example in which spin expectation values wind around circles in the plane of wavevectors.
The spin-rotation coupling contribution to a rotating-frame Hamiltonian couples angular velocity to angular momentum. When discussing spin alone, identify which part of the total angular momentum enters the effective model.
A transverse magnetic field rotates a nonequilibrium spin polarization while diffusion and spin relaxation redistribute it. The field dependence of a detector signal can constrain spin lifetime and transport parameters. A distribution of diffusion times and rotation of the injecting/detecting electrodes must be included when relevant.
Loss of transported spin polarization at an interface, distinct from bulk spin relaxation in an adjacent layer.
The distance over which a nonequilibrium spin imbalance decays appreciably in a diffusive conductor. In a simple diffusion-relaxation model it is ; interfaces can contribute additional spin-memory loss.
Exchange of energy between magnetic spin degrees of freedom and the surrounding lattice, allowing their temperatures to approach thermal equilibrium. It permits adiabatic demagnetization to cool a solid and its attached load.
A model using exponentially correlated magnetic fluctuations. For homonuclear dipolar relaxation, . Its rate maximum occurs near ; a single-frequency Lorentzian instead peaks at one.
The Jordan–Wigner transformation represents a one-dimensional spin one-half chain by fermions with a parity string preceding each site. With , one has and . The string converts the off-site canonical anticommutation relations into commuting spin operators. Adjacent exchange terms become quadratic fermion expressions, while a periodic end bond depends on global fermion parity.
For with , neighbouring Jordan–Wigner transformation strings differ by only the local parity factor. The canonical anticommutation relations give , proving the displayed local spin identity. The closing bond of a periodic chain instead retains total fermion parity; cancellation on bulk bonds does not justify discarding that global sector.
For and periodic spins, the end exchange term carries the global fermion parity . Replacing the end bond by a uniform hopping expression requires : even parity gives antiperiodic fermions, odd parity periodic fermions. Each resulting quadratic spectrum must be restricted to states of the parity used in its boundary condition.
With occupied fermion sites representing up-spins, use , and . The canonical anticommutation relations imply , and . Consequently the two sites commute as spin operators, while . This normalization is essential: the unscaled combinations are twice .
The two-spin XY Hamiltonian becomes
In particular, and fix the hopping signs. The modes and preserve the canonical anticommutation relations and give .
In units , spin one-half is the two-dimensional irreducible spin angular momentum representation with components . The Pauli matrices give eigenvalues along every unit axis. The normalized -axis states are .
An electron has spin one-half. Its intrinsic spin angular momentum has two possible components, , along a specified unit vector . These are the two eigenvalues of the corresponding spin measurement; the spin is distinct from the electron's orbital angular momentum.
For a spin one-half system, an ideal projective measurement along a unit vector measures . Its eigenvalues are , corresponding to physical spin angular momentum components , and its orthogonal projections are . For density matrix , the Born rule and the Pauli matrix multiplication law give the displayed probabilities. Thus a spin measurement along one direction tests only that component of the Bloch vector; measurements along three independent directions determine the entire density matrix.
For , the normalized eigenstates of are
with eigenvalues and .
A Stern-Gerlach experiment separates atomic beams according to a component of their magnetic moment in a nonuniform magnetic field. For an appropriate two-state spin system, calibrated outputs distinguish the two spin eigenvalues; Stern-Gerlach expectation estimation explains how repeated fresh preparations turn channel counts into an expectation value.
The decisive contrast is between two separated components of an atomic beam and the continuous spread predicted for randomly oriented classical magnetic moments. Neither component need be an infinitely narrow spot: velocity spread and the resolving power of the scientific instrument affect the spatial image. The apparatus converts an internal magnetic moment into a displacement large enough to inspect, connecting angular momentum eigenstates to macroscopic evidence.
The ideal projective measurement of a spin-one-half component along a unit axis . The two outcomes have Born rule probabilities . For an input with Bloch vector , they are . This model distinguishes a mathematical spin measurement from engineering a literal free-electron beam splitter.
An electrically neutral neutron still has a magnetic moment . A collimated beam passing through an inhomogeneous magnetic field experiences the force derived from . In a region whose field axis is approximately fixed, a spin one-half neutron has two field-axis spin eigenstates, producing two allowed transverse forces and two separated beam components after a drift. A homogeneous field can cause Larmor precession but cannot separate positions through this force.
The neutron's negative gyromagnetic ratio interchanges which spin projection moves toward increasing field; it does not change the number of branches. An unpolarized beam gives equal ideal populations. A beam prepared in one field-axis eigenstate populates only one branch, so splitting into two observed spots presupposes both components and sufficient spatial resolution.
In 1922, Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach used an electrically heated oven to emit neutral silver chemical atoms. Two platinum apertures, a pinhole and a slit – wide, supplied collimation. The beam passed along a knife-edge pole in a nonuniform magnetic field. At its end, a glass plate collected the condensed silver. Continuous pumping maintained vacuum; the thin deposit required development even after eight hours.[ref]
The field-off image established the undeflected slit width. A comparison put field-on and field-off deposits on the same plate. Microscopy revealed two deflected bands, no detectable central component, and broadening attributed to the velocity distribution. Alignment and distance from the knife-edge affected the pattern; precise magnetic field gradient measurements were still pending.[ref]
The apertures act as a collimator: they constrain the initial transverse positions and velocities, so a magnetic displacement can be distinguished from an initially broad beam. Vacuum reduces collisions that would destroy this preparation. Deposition integrates arrivals over the exposure; a darkened band is not a time-resolved record of individual chemical atoms. The field-off comparison tests whether the magnet changes the spatial distribution, while alignment checks address a geometric source of apparent asymmetry. Finite sensitivity qualifies the absence of a central deposit: it is an experimental upper limit, not a proof that exactly zero atoms landed there.
Figure 1.
From an oven to a silver deposit, and a separate ideal flight model
. The upper schematic shows the historical sequence without reproducing the original image. The lower diagram introduces the hypothetical constant-gradient magnet length and additional drift distance used below. The historical plate was at the magnet exit; the extra drift is a modeling choice. Details.
Figure 2.
Display of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus at the University of Hamburg
. Photograph by Lesendes Okapi, 29 January 2019, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. The display in the Institute of Physical Chemistry includes an apparatus arrangement and a plaque honouring Otto Stern. This photograph documents the later exhibition. Source.
Let the atomic beam travel along , with velocity , and let measure displacement along the dominant magnetic field gradient. For a fixed effective magnetic moment component , the magnetic dipole potential energy is . Taking its negative partial derivative gives
A spatially uniform magnetic field can produce torque and Larmor precession, but cannot produce this translational separation. In a quantum state following a local internal energy eigenvalue , the more general expression is , with effective magnetic moment . Treating that moment as constant is an approximation with a physical regime, not an extra measured fact. Assume the local magnetic field direction stays nearly fixed across the sampled beam, and that internal states follow it without transitions, as in the adiabatic theorem. The scalar gradient model describes the beam's neighborhood; it omits the full magnetic field's transverse components and fringe regions.
Assume a constant over magnet length , followed by a field-free drift . Neglect transverse motion at entry and changes in longitudinal velocity. Newton's second law gives transverse acceleration for whole-atom mass . The magnet transit time is , and the drift time is . The magnet supplies both a displacement and an exit transverse velocity:
The contribution is motion with the acquired transverse velocity, not continued acceleration outside the magnet. For the plate-at-exit geometry, set . For a nonzero entrance transverse velocity , add . These terms show why initial collimation and flight geometry matter when inferring a magnetic moment from a deposit.
Choose hypothetical parameters , , , , and . Approximate the two effective magnetic moments by , where the Bohr magneton is . Then , and . The positive displacement is about inside the magnet plus during drift: , with full separation . These chosen values illustrate the model and are not reconstructed 1922 measurements.
The exit transverse velocity is only about , small compared with the chosen forward velocity; this checks the small-deflection assumption. Halving halves , doubling divides by four, and setting removes most of this example's separation. A real pole has fringe magnetic fields and a position-dependent gradient; these require a more complete trajectory calculation.
For an equally populated ideal pair of angular momentum eigenstates, the magnetic moment component takes two values, , and the displacements at fixed velocity are . Compare a specified classical alternative: every chemical atom carries a permanent magnetic moment of fixed magnitude , with independently isotropic initial orientations and no dissipative alignment. If , the sphere's area element is , so has a uniform distribution on . With precession preserving this component in the ideal geometry, the displacement fills the interval continuously. A pair of bands therefore tests allowed components rather than merely proving that silver is magnetic. Other classical preparation assumptions would be different models and must be stated.
To include finite instrumental width, choose a normalized Gaussian distribution
with standard deviation , representing a combined field-off spatial width. At fixed velocity the model probability density functions are
Each has unit integral and zero mean; the different shapes, rather than a different average displacement, distinguish them. The discrete model has variance , whereas the classical model has variance . Their common mean also explains why the raw average landing position is insufficient to identify the internal quantum state.
Now choose a uniform distribution of forward velocities from to , explicitly as an example rather than the oven's actual distribution. Average either conditional probability density function over that interval. The positive-channel displacement ranges from to , since slower chemical atoms spend longer accelerating and drifting. The two components broaden into bands even though their internal magnetic moment values remain discrete. The corresponding classical profile continues to populate the center. The displayed strip darkness is proportional to predicted deposited number density, with equal total arrivals; it is not a photograph or a calibrated optical response of a developed film.
Figure 1.
Discrete magnetic components and continuous classical deflections
. Original model predictions with the chosen flight parameters, comparing one forward speed with a finite speed interval. Both alternatives include the same Gaussian spatial width. Synthetic deposition strips use a common density scale; none of the curves or strips is measured data. Details.
Increasing the spatial width until it is comparable with can hide the two maxima. At fixed velocity, differentiating the two-state probability density function twice gives : the central minimum becomes a central maximum when . Conversely, a broad distribution of velocities need not create a new internal component: it spreads each existing component through the dependence. Further instrumental limits include collisions, aperture clipping of strongly deflected trajectories, asymmetric pole geometry, and nonlinear film development. Field-off widths and a mapped magnetic field gradient are needed to separate such effects. For a modern counting experiment, channel calibration and efficiency corrections belong to Stern-Gerlach expectation estimation; spatial separation alone does not supply those statistics.
The 1922 interpretation concerned space quantization of atomic magnetic moments in the old quantum theory. The modern electron spin proposal came in 1925; the original observers did not identify intrinsic electron spin as the cause of their splitting. An orbital interpretation then seemed plausible, but the later spin explanation gives a different account of the same two-component evidence.[ref]
Modern atomic data assign neutral silver the ground state electron configuration and electronic term . The filled electron shells contribute zero net electronic angular momentum; the outer unpaired electron has orbital angular momentum , spin , and electronic total angular momentum . The magnetic quantum number has two values .[ref]
In the effective electronic description,
The minus sign matters: for positive , the component with has negative electronic magnetic moment and deflects toward negative in our coordinates. Calling the upper spot “spin up” without specifying the magnetic field and channel calibration can therefore reverse the assignment. The total angular momentum operator here sums electronic orbital angular momentum and electronic spin; is not a claim that the atomic nucleus has no spin. Hyperfine structure and nuclear magnetic moments can require additional internal levels, so a two-channel electronic approximation must be justified for the field and resolution being used.
This is a neutral atomic beam, not a beam of free electrons. The deflected mass in the flight equations is the entire silver chemical atom; its dominant electronic magnetic moment supplies the state-dependent force. Replacing that atom by a free electron would also introduce the charged particle's Lorentz force and a different preparation problem. The ideal two-state model is useful because it isolates the connection between discrete internal components and spatially resolved outputs; it does not retroactively turn the 1922 deposit into a direct contemporary identification of intrinsic electron spin.
The Holstein–Primakoff transformation represents a spin- operator algebra with a bosonic creation operator and annihilation operator:
The order of the square root and oscillator operator matters. On the physical Fock states , , the raising and lowering matrix elements are and . Their squared difference gives , proving the spin commutation relations. Expanding the square root yields the linear spin-wave approximation and its interaction corrections.
On , the raising/lowering amplitudes are and . Their squared difference gives . The order of the number-dependent square root is essential.
A spin- Hilbert space has dimension . Its Holstein–Primakoff transformation therefore uses only bosonic occupation numbers . The square root annihilates the upper endpoint. A truncated linear spin-wave approximation formally enlarges this space; it is self-consistent only when boson depletion is small compared with .
The components of spin angular momentum satisfy . In units , the spin ladder operators obey and .
The spin- irreducible representation has dimension , with basis for and Casimir eigenvalue .
In the ordered angular momentum eigenstate basis , with positive raising coefficients,
To derive them, restricts to its two adjacent superdiagonal entries. Write these real entries as . Since , the relation reads , forcing . Adding and subtracting the ladder operators gives the displayed matrices. Direct multiplication verifies the angular momentum commutation relations and .
For active rotations with , the irreducible spin representation matrix is , where . Its spin-one-half middle matrix is . A rotation acts by ; only integer-spin representations descend to the special orthogonal group in three dimensions.
The rotation matrix about the axis in a spin- angular-momentum representation. For , ; its square gives the polar dependence of a transition between those spin projections.
For Hermitian and adjoint angular momentum ladder operators on a positive-definite inner-product space, a highest-weight vector of weight obeys . The commutation relations give . Taking inner products forces to be a nonnegative integer: otherwise the first negative factor would give a negative squared norm. The norm first vanishes at , so the generated unitary representation has dimension . Without positivity an abstract highest-weight module can remain infinite-dimensional even at an integral highest weight.
In the ordered spin-one basis , the second angular momentum operator satisfies . Therefore its matrix exponential reduces to . A half-turn exchanges the two outer weights and negates the middle weight. Applied to the pion isospin triplet, this fixes the rotation factor in G parity.
The operators satisfy
The spin raising operator increases the magnetic quantum number by one and annihilates the maximal-weight state.
The spin lowering operator decreases the magnetic quantum number by one and annihilates the minimal-weight state.
In descending order, the spin- raising operator has superdiagonal entries ; and are its Hermitian real and imaginary combinations.
A spin coherent state is obtained by rotating the maximal-weight state so that it is an eigenstate of spin along a chosen direction with eigenvalue .
Prepare the spin coherent state and evolve with Hamiltonian operator for time . In the descending- basis of the spin-one angular momentum matrices, the initial vector is and the evolved vector is , where . The orthonormal basis has vectors , and . Taking their inner products with the evolved vector gives probability amplitudes , and . Their squared moduli give the Born rule probabilities in the title. At integer half-turns , the outcome is deterministically .
In the ordered z-projection basis , the normalized eigenvector of with eigenvalue is the displayed vector. It follows by a y-axis rotation of the maximum-weight state, or direct solution of the tridiagonal eigenvalue equation. Squaring its entries gives the three z-projection measurement probabilities.
A spin coherent-state path integral inserts group-averaged resolutions of the identity between short time steps. Its kinetic term is the Spin coherent-state Berry phase, equal to times the oriented solid angle swept on the sphere.
At azimuth , the normalized spin- coherent-state components are proportional to .
Larmor precession is the precession of a magnetic moment about an applied magnetic field. For a spin with gyromagnetic ratio and Hamiltonian , its expectation obeys . A spin coherent state retains its coherent form during this rotation.
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 129 total.

Ancestors (4)

  1. Quantum mechanics
  2. Branches of physics
  3. Physics
  4. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (2)

In quantum mechanics, the angular momentum operator is an important operator that describes the angular momentum of a quantum system, similar to how the linear momentum operator describes the linear momentum. Angular momentum is a key concept in both classical and quantum physics, and it plays a crucial role in the behavior of atomic and subatomic particles. There are several forms of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, including orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum.
Basically the operators are just analogous to the classical ones e.g. the classical:
becomes:
Besides the angular momentum in each direction, we also have the total angular momentum:
Then you have to understand what each one of those does to the each atomic orbital:
There is an uncertainty principle between the x, y and z angular momentums, we can only measure one of them with certainty at a time. Video 1. "Quantum Mechanics 7a - Angular Momentum I by ViaScience (2013)" justifies this intuitively by mentioning that this is analogous to precession: if you try to measure electrons e.g. with the Zeeman effect the precess on the other directions which you end up modifing.