Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 35

Ubuntu 20.10 as per xmrig.com/docs/miner/build/ubuntu:At minexmr.com/#getting_started we see that all you then need is a single CLI command:Seems simple, well done devs!

Benchmark on Lenovo ThinkPad P51 (2017) as per xmrig.com/docs/miner/benchmark:gives:which according to the minexmr.com mining pool would generate 0.0005 XMR/day, which at the February 2021 rate of 140 USD/XMR is 0.07 USD/day. The minimum payout in that pool is 0.004 XMR so it would take 8 days to reach that.

So clearly, application-specific integrated circuit mining is the only viable way of doing this.

Some people considering Raspberry Pis also conclude obviously that it is useless at a 10H/s rate:

www.makeuseof.com/cryptos-you-can-mine-at-home/ is a completely full of bullshit article that says otherwise. How can someone publish that!

Zephyr support: docs.zephyrproject.org/2.7.0/boards/arm/bbc_microbit/doc/index.html

Bluetooth support: not enough RAM for it, though in principle its chip/transceiver could support it! microbit-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/v1.0.1/ble.html

Supported editors: microbit.org/code/

MicroPython web editor and compiler: python.microbit.org/v/2

Everything in this section is tested on the Micro Bit v1 from Micro Bit v1 unless otherwise noted.

Bibliography:

For a commented initial example, see: e. Coli K-12 MG1655 gene thrA.

KEGG does the visual maps well.

But BioCyc is generally better otherwise.

In the context of cryptography, authentication means "ensuring that the message you got comes from who you think it did".

Authentication is how we prevent the man-in-the-middle attack.

Authentication is one of the hardest parts of cryptography, because the only truly secure way to do it is by driving to the other party yourself to establish a pre-shared key so you can do message authentication code. Or to share your public key with them if you are satisfied with the safety of post-quantum cryptography.

Toy model of matter that exhibits phase transition in dimension 2 and greater. It does not provide numerically exact results by itself, but can serve as a tool to theorize existing and new phase transitions.

Each point in the lattice has two possible states: TODO insert image.

As mentioned at: stanford.edu/~jeffjar/statmech/intro4.html some systems which can be seen as modelled by it include:

Also has some funky relations to renormalization TODO.

Bibliography:

Suppose that a rod has is length $L$ measured on a rest frame $S$ (or maybe even better: two identical rulers were manufactured, and one is taken on a spaceship, a bit like the twin paradox).

Question: what is the length $L^{\prime }$ than an observer in frame $S^{\prime }$ moving relative to $S$ as speed $v$ observe the rod to be?

The key idea is that there are two events to consider in each frame, which we call 1 and 2:Note that what you visually observe on a photograph is a different measurement to the more precise/easy to calculate two event measurement. On a photograph, it seems you might not even see the contraction in some cases as mentioned at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrell_rotation

Measuring a length means to measure the $x_2-x_1$ difference for a single point in time in your frame ($t2=t1$).

So what we want to obtain is $x_2^{\prime }-x_1^{\prime }$ for any given time $t^{\prime }2=t^{\prime }1$.

In summary, we have:

By plugging those values into the Lorentz transformation, we can eliminate $t_{2}and{t}_1$, and conclude that for any $t_2^{\prime }=t_1^{\prime }$, the length contraction relation holds:

The key question that needs intuitive clarification then is: but how can this be symmetric? How can both observers see each other's rulers shrink?

And the key answer is: because to the second observer, the measurements made by the first observer are not simultaneous. Notably, the two measurement events are obviously spacelike-separated events by looking at the light cone, and therefore can be measured even in different orders by different observers.

Generalization of orthogonal group to preserve different bilinear forms. Important because the Lorentz group is $SO(1,3)$.

C plus plus is what you get when you want to have all of:

Java is good.

Its boilerplate requirement is a pain, but the design is otherwise very clean.

But its ecosystem sucks.

The development process is rather closed, the issue tracker obscure.

And above all, Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. killed everybody's trust in it once and for all. Thanks Oracle.