hahahhaha yes it was unintentional. Thanks for the info

Hahahhahaha I had forgotten its purpose!

Don't mind the escape characters on the {scope}. This was not supposed to be written like that

I got it to work! There were two problems: First:

I solved this by adding a new line after the {scope}

Then:

This gave me an error of: Headers are not allowed in OBB Web Articles. Fixed it by adding a new line again.

I do not work with \Include because I had trouble figuring out how to do that. I will try it in the future again hahahha. Now it's a big monolithic mess

Now I have got this error:

Glass is the new article. Weird because I didn't have the same problem with starch

Thank you

Relevant information: If I delete the whole h4 or comment it out, the same error occurs. So it has to do with the already loaded text. That's very weird. The error doesn't seem to occur if I change other old parts of the text.

so I can*

Thank you, no worries! Trying to study some organic chemistry so I write something of value here

hahahaha, Filipino? Is this a US term or are you referring to the ethnicity? My nickname kind of resembles something in tagalog if you mean that. I am a chemist (as you may have guessed) from Greece, still studying. I write about topics I am comfortable with.

Thank you for your help! Basically everything would work if I had read the documentation correctly.

Oh had no idea this was the same markdown. meant to say: equals Bleach {scope}

equals equals whatever

Some more things that I encountered as I tried to add a second article: Whenever I publish something new from my terminal, I am immediately logged off and I have to keep logging back in to make small changes to the articles that I have written.

Also I couldn't publish a second article correctly. It seemed like name clashes were present, as I had made a second "references" section for the second article. But why is that? Shouldn't it all be allowed as the two "references" sections have different parents and thus are not identical. I am most probably missing something there, but I couldn't find an easy solution to my problem by reading the docs. (I keep my .bigb files in a separate directories and publish whichever one I want. I don't know if that's the correct way though.) I tried following your web editor suggestion and renaming my "references" section to "references | [article name]" but when executing the command, no changes were found.

I remember that I published my first article with a hack that I have already forgotten. And this of course is not the standard way that you wanted. I find the publication process a bit too complex for a beginner, especially for one who has no knowledge of computer science! (thankfully I have some, but even this was not enough in my case. I even watched some videos on how to publish projects and yet I couldn't find a way that made me comfortable).

Again, I apologize for my misuse of the website. I am surely not reading the docs enough.

P.S: Is there a way to not have a new line every time I put some latex in the text? Also: My new article's structure looks like this:

[...]

For some reason Bleach was never put as an actual section in the web, but instead all of the children nodes were published parentless. Why is that?

Wow I must have seriously messed up. Not only did I manage to make duplicates of my current article, but also somehow got my home webpage to crash. I surely am a bad user! At least I got my local file uploaded, not in the way I wanted though (inheritance is not working as expected from the file structure. But that probably is my fault).

Also maybe some things to check (not that they are 100% bugs): 1) When viewing parent/children articles sometimes the dropdown menu doesn't work when clicked (the upside down triangle). 2) Why not just delete articles instead of unlisting them? Isn't it bad for the server's storage?

I feel kind of bad for all the requests that I am making, I should preview my stuff before committing it.

My new article seemed awesome when I previewed it via the index.html file but when I uploaded it (with --web) the inheritance was broken. Maybe that's because the article already existed and I tried to push it again! Yes, that makes sense.

Thanks for all the tips. I will start using the cli version, it seems much more comfortable, at least for me

Oh that was really fast. I checked a few minutes ago and I though I was crazy. Nice work