Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the analytic number theory and elliptic curves course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For , logarithmic differentiation of the absolutely convergent Euler product gives , where and it is zero otherwise. On the line , this series is absolutely bounded by , and is integrable in the vertical variable. Hence absolute convergence justifies interchanging sum and contour integral. The given first Mellin kernel, with , contributes if and zero otherwise. ThusSplitting off gives the desired decomposition with for . There is a range misprint in the second supplied kernel: for its integral is zero, not . The globally correct value is . For it is exactly the expression used here, so the subsequent large- argument is unchanged.
For a continuously differentiable with the given decay, both and are integrable and at either end. Integration by parts on finite intervals and passage to the limit gives, for ,Its absolute value is at most , proving the estimate.
We also need uniform control of on bounded as . Here is the three-four-one zero-free-region argument supplying it. For , the Euler product and implyIf vanished for a nonzero real , holomorphy from (3) would make the left side , since remains bounded, a contradiction. Thus there are no zeros on that line, and there are none to its right by the Euler product. After removal of the singularity at one, and are bounded on the compact rectangle , .
For , put . The supplied estimates give anduniformly in . Since , it follows that and , both . Also . Together with the compact bound this proves both required decay bounds with constants independent of .
Parametrizing the contour, the remainder in the decomposition is times the oscillatory integral just bounded. Choose for , so . Hence the remainder is . Finally , and is absorbed, proving
Past exam of the analytic number theory and elliptic curves course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 3 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Each finite-interval integral is entire in : the integrand is and its complex derivatives may be integrated on the compact interval. On a compact subset of , choose with . Then . The Weierstrass uniform-convergence theorem gives convergence and holomorphy of throughout that half-plane.
Integration by parts givesFor , sum absolutely and use the integral over to obtain . Rearranging gives the first requested identity.
On , the magnitude of is at most . On a compact subset of , its integrals are bounded by a convergent constant multiple of for some . Thus is holomorphic there. The prefactor is entire, leaving only the explicit simple pole at one in , with residue one.
Differentiate and integrate. Its endpoint values both vanish, givingAt the last quotient has its continuous value . For , telescoping over gives . Substitution into yieldsThis supplies the analytic continuation to apart from the pole. Evaluating its holomorphic expression at zero makes the series term vanish and gives .
Past exam of the analytic number theory and elliptic curves course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For , the Euler product theorem isThe local series converge absolutely, and the product is absolutely convergent in the sense that the sum over primes of the absolute deviations of the local factors from one is finite. Indeed this sum is bounded by . To prove the identity, expand the product over primes at most . Absolute convergence permits all those local expansions, and multiplicativity identifies the coefficients with for integers whose prime factors are at most . Every omitted integer exceeds , so the difference from the full Dirichlet series is bounded by its absolute tail beyond , which tends to zero. The same tail bound on a closed right half-plane inside proves local uniform convergence. With signed coefficients a local factor can be zero; the identity does not require claiming every such general Euler product is nonzero.
For , multiplicativity gives local coefficients . With ,The divisor bound from (1), applied with a sufficiently small exponent, proves absolute convergence when ; divergence at one follows from . Multiplying the local identities therefore givesFor , the inequality gives . Sum those nonnegative terms and enlarge to the whole infinite series to get the required comparison.
Past exam of the analytic number theory and elliptic curves course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 1 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A multiplicative arithmetic function has and satisfies whenever are coprime. For a prime power , the divisors are exactly , so there are . Multiplicativity therefore givesFix . If , then for every integer . There are only finitely many primes below the threshold. For each such prime the sequence tends to zero, so its supremum is finite and at least one. ThusThe product is over a fixed finite set, independent of , proving .
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





